For the best printed copy of this issue, with the notes at the foot of each page, use the PDF button on henrygeorgethestandard.org/1887-07-09.

Contents The Standard July 9, 1887Jul 9, 1887

Henry George’s weekly · New York · transcribed edition

July 9, 1887 Vol. II, No. 1Whole No. 27

Start readingContentsPDF

Contents

166 articles and notices

222 notes: 122 editor’s notes (63 placed approximately), 100 misprints. Uncertain readings are in [brackets?]. Original spelling and misprints are kept as printed.

Page 1

  1. col. 1★ [T]HE COMING EXCOMMUNICATION. Ed.: Henry George
  2. col. 1★ [Editorial note: Rome's decision promulgated on the Fourth of July]
  3. col. 1★ [Editorial note: the cause of McGlynn's excommunication and the Catholic hierarchy]
  4. col. 1★ [Editorial note: the pro-poverty press on the excommunication]
  5. col. 2★ [Editorial note: what the excommunication will do]
  6. col. 2★ [Editorial note: Edward McGlynn is to be excommunicated]
  7. col. 3★ UNDER THE BAN. J. Anketell (Ed.: J. Ancketell)
  8. col. 3★ [Editorial note: Consider who is to be excommunicated]
  9. col. 3★ [Editorial note: accommodations for reporters]
  10. col. 4★ [Editorial note: the united labor party's Syracuse convention]
  11. col. 4★ [Editorial note: the union labor party]
  12. col. 5★ [Editorial note: a short platform]
  13. col. 5★ [Editorial note: restriction of immigration and T. V. Powderly] Henry George
  14. col. 5★ The "Isolated" Priest in Milwaukee.
  15. col. 5A Right Divine. Catholic
  16. col. 5Earnest Men in Lancaster, Pa. Henry W. Stein
  17. col. 5Perpotuating Slavery in Africa.
  18. col. 5★ The McGlynn Fund.
  19. col. 6★ ST. BERNARD AND EDWARD MᶜGLYNN. A Thoughtful Letter from a Catholic Priest—An Illustration from the History of St. Bernard. A Catholic Priest
  20. col. 6Give Capital and Labor a Chance. N. D.
  21. col. 6Can't Keep a Copy of "The Standard" Long. Edward Costello

Page 2

  1. col. 1★ ANTI-POVERTY. AN ENTHUSIASTIC MEETING, NOTWITHSTANDING THE HOT WEATHER. A Stirring Address by Rev. C. M. Winchester of Middletown, N. Y.—Thoughtful Words on the Pope-Corrigan Situation by Michael Clarke—John McMackin Speaks for the United Labor Party—"Let Them Excommunicate if They Dare."
  2. col. 4A Knife Grinder's Story. John Carreer
  3. col. 4The People Are Thinking. Edward McGarrity
  4. col. 4A Brother in the North. Victor McGuffin
  5. col. 4Rev. J. B. Barnhill on the Cross of the New Crusade.
  6. col. 5★ THE APPEAL TO ROME. A Priestly Correspondent Gives Some Important Points in Canon Law.
  7. col. 5It Was a Lazy Man's Paradise, But That Time Has Gone.
  8. col. 6Now Figure Out the Profit on That Purchase, and Remember that Somebody Has Made It All. (Ed.: Toledo Blade)
  9. col. 6No Public Land to Be Had. (Ed.: Springfield, Mass., Republican)
  10. col. 6There is a Better Blessing Than That in Store for Them. (Ed.: San Francisco Argonaut)
  11. col. 6Emigration from Italy. (Ed.: Philadelphia Telegram)
  12. col. 6The Wisdom of Foresight. (Ed.: New York Cor. Philadelphia Record)
  13. col. 6Alabama's Great Opportunity. Edward Q. Norton (Ed.: Edward Q. Norton in Mobile Item)
  14. col. 6Must Sell or Die. (Ed.: Toronto Labor Reformer)
  15. col. 6★ Listen to Whitelaw Reid. (Ed.: New York Tribune Editorial)

Page 3

  1. col. 1QUERIES AND ANSWERS. A Threadbare Question. G.
  2. col. 1If. George Lawrence
  3. col. 1Twenty-Fifth of Henry VIII. Poyntz Fox
  4. col. 1Wealth Concentration. Frenchman
  5. col. 2Co-Operation. William H. Smith
  6. col. 2"Made" Land. Wm. E. Fellendorf
  7. col. 2Money. H. S. Chase
  8. col. 3He Dies Young. E. W. J.
  9. col. 3A Case of Hardship. C. W. Phillips
  10. col. 3★ The Best Way to Find Out. Henry de Koch (Ed.: Henry De Koch)
  11. col. 4Notes. (Ed.: D. M. Hunter, J. H. Milleur, W. Curtis Taylor, Levi R. Pierce)
  12. col. 4Another New Name for the Party. Charles F. Kipp
  13. col. 4A Sample Case of Western "Progress." W. H. Creamer
  14. col. 4Farmers in the South. (Ed.: Ralph Beaumont)
  15. col. 4A Man Who is Thinking. Worker
  16. col. 4And That Is the Anti-Poverty Society We Are Re-establishing Now. (Ed.: New York Observer)
  17. col. 4Can't a Young Man Look to the Rise of Land Values for Wealth? (Ed.: Toronto, Can., Christian Guardian)
  18. col. 5WHERE THE CHURCHES STAND. Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost Speaks Frankly on the Subject—Missions Are Simply Church Poor Houses. Hugh O. Pentecost (Ed.: Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost)
  19. col. 6Words of Wisdom. (Ed.: New York Sun)
  20. col. 6Isn't This Sound Common Sense? (Ed.: Burlington, Ia., Justice)
  21. col. 6The Way Protection Works. (Ed.: Philadelphia Record)
  22. col. 6The "Star" Is Impressed, in Spite of Its Pro-Poverty Principles. (Ed.: New York Star (on tenements))
  23. col. 6Why Employers Combine. (Ed.: Real Estate Record and Guide)

Page 4

  1. col. 1★ THE STANDARD.
  2. col. 1SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887.
  3. col. 1JACOB SHARP.
  4. col. 2THE NEW FOURTH OF JULY.
  5. col. 2[Editorial note: a Philadelphia paper on whole houses and tenements]
  6. col. 3[Editorial note: co-operation and land tenure]
  7. col. 3[Editorial note: the price of air and sunlight]
  8. col. 3[Editorial note: Anti-poverty society membership certificates]
  9. col. 3[Editorial note: a suggestion for Archbishop Corrigan's next pastoral]
  10. col. 3FOURTH OF JULY AT SUMMIT HILL. The Sort of Independence They Have in the Lehigh Valley—Miners Paying $3.50 a Ton for Coal—Poverty in the Midst of Unbounded Natural Opportunities—The Mysteries of Overproduction.
  11. col. 4The Fourth in the Coal Regions.
  12. col. 4The United Labor Party on Independence Day. (Ed.: John McMackin, Rev. Winchester, Frank Ferrall, James P. Archibald)
  13. col. 4The New Wine in the Old Bottle. A Britisher
  14. col. 4Failures in the First Half of 1886. (Ed.: Bradstreet’s)
  15. col. 4How to Dispose of the Ludlow, Vt., Farms. E. Y.
  16. col. 4The Movement in Pennsylvania.
  17. col. 4No Hope in Political Churchianity. Stewart Carlisle
  18. col. 4The Land Question in Alabama. W. H. Davidson
  19. col. 5As Manufacturers They Lacked Brains to Succeed, as Land Owners They Didn't Need Any Brains. E. W. Nellis
  20. col. 5They Want It Right Here, and as Soon as Possible, Too. Wideawake
  21. col. 5The Railroads and Real Estate. (Ed.: Grand Rapids Workman)
  22. col. 5Not Born Free and Equal. (Ed.: Correspondence Providence People)
  23. col. 5Houses and the Death Rate. (Ed.: Boston Transcript)
  24. col. 5Another Opinion of the "Post's" About Cursing. (Ed.: Evening Post, July 5)
  25. col. 5Barry's Opinion. (Ed.: Cincinnati Enquirer)
  26. col. 5And They Need Not Have Worked Either. (Ed.: St. Paul Dispatch)
  27. col. 6SOCIETY NOTES.
  28. col. 6An Admission to be Noted. (Ed.: New York World)

Page 5

  1. col. 1★ Father McGlynn. (Ed.: London Saturday Review)
  2. col. 1★ THE POOR MAN'S COURT. Louis F. Post
  3. col. 3CUTTING ADRIFT. A Prominent Republican of Colorado Leaves the Old Party to Fight for the New Issues. (Ed.: James W. Bucklin)
  4. col. 3★ Ringing Resolutions From a K. of L. Assembly. (Ed.: Cephas Luellen, J. C. Williams)
  5. col. 3The Boom in California. (Ed.: San Francisco Call)
  6. col. 4A PENNSYLVANIA MINING TOWN. Mahanoy Plane and Its Surroundings—God's Goodness to Mr. Shafer—It Takes a Day's Work to Buy a Ton of Coal, Though a Few Minutes' Work Will Mine It—Ringing Fourth of July Resolutions.
  7. col. 4★ The Land and Labor Demonstration in Cincinnati. (Ed.: Henry George, Joseph R. Buchanan,, S. B. Williams, Rosshan)
  8. col. 5And it Would Start a Great Many Other Booms Besides, a Building Boom, too. (Ed.: Correspondence Anoka, Ky., Union)
  9. col. 5Ireland's Jubilee Year. (Ed.: Dublin Freeman’s Journal)
  10. col. 6Content. J. L. Joynes (translator) (Ed.: Translated from the German by J. L. Joynes)
  11. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Chicago Mail]
  12. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [note on the Cork Eagle]
  13. col. 6STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from New York Uptown Visitor]
  14. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from St. Louis Evening Chronicle]
  15. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Exchange]
  16. col. 6STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Utica Herald]
  17. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Buffalo Sunday Truth]
  18. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Mobile Sunday Times (editorial notes)]
  19. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from New York Social Science]
  20. col. 6★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from San Francisco Call]
  21. col. 6STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from St. Louis New Order]
  22. col. 6STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from New York World]
  23. col. 6We Don't, Eh? And Pray, Who Is "We?" (Ed.: Cyrus Field’s Mail and Express)

Page 6

  1. col. 1GANSEVOORT MARKET. (Ed.: see if https://ephemeralnewyork.wordpress.com/tag/53-61-gansevoort-street/ is useful link for this article)
  2. col. 6Is This Anarchy, or Only Common Sense? (Ed.: Hamilton, Ont., Times)
  3. col. 6"Out of Debt." (Ed.: Burlington, Ia., Justice)
  4. col. 6Creating Wealth by Labor. Faraway Moses
  5. col. 6Presbyterianism and Anti-Poverty. A True Blue Presbyterian and a George Man (Ed.: “A True Blue Presbyterian and a George Man”)
  6. col. 6A Philanthropist Who Provides Work. (Ed.: Springfield Republican)
  7. col. 6For Pity's Sake! Aren't They Doing So? (Ed.: Patterson Guardian)

Page 7

  1. col. 1The Masque of Life.
  2. col. 1THE POOR, POORER?
  3. col. 3★ An Open Letter to Professor David Swing. W. H. Van Ornum
  4. col. 3When Mr. Warder Retires Will He Talk About How He Worked for His Money? (Ed.: Springfield, Ohio, Republic)
  5. col. 3It's a Very Simple Question. (Ed.: Horse Collar Maker’s Journal)
  6. col. 3The Bodyke Tenants. (Ed.: Correspondence Mail and Express)
  7. col. 4★ LAND AND LABOR.
  8. col. 5Organizing in Philadelphia. J. H. M.
  9. col. 5Work in Minneapolis. A. Dollenmayer (Ed.: A. Dollenmater)
  10. col. 5[Letter from Tampa, Fla., on a new land and labor club] John H. McCormick
  11. col. 5★ This Sort of Thing Passes 'for Argument With the Pro-Poverty Press. (Ed.: New York Sun)
  12. col. 5Anti-Poverty Societies of One. (Ed.: Kansas City Star)

Advertisements (9): NEW PUBLICATIONS. HENRY GEORGE'S SOLUTION OF THE LABOR PROBLEM. WHY I PREACHED ON IT. · THE PHONOGRAPHIC MAGAZINE. · NEW PUBLICATIONS. HENRY GEORGE'S NEW BOOK, PROTECTION OR FREE TRADE? AN EXAMINATION OF THE TARIFF QUESTION WITH ESPECIAL REGARD TO THE INTERESTS OF LABOR. · THE LAND AND LABOR LIBRARY.— · GERMAN EDITION OF "PROGRESS AND POVERTY." FORTSCHRITT UND ARMUTH. · JUST OUT. AN ACCOUNT OF THE GEORGE-HEWITT CAMPAIGN. · THE DEMOCRAT. A RADICAL REVIEW MONTHLY. · TAX REFORMER. · NATURAL RIGHTS, NATURAL LIBERTY and NATURAL LAW.

Page 8

  1. col. 1PUBLISHER'S NOTES. (Ed.: Elizabeth F. B., A. Vinette, Henry C. Power, E. B. Crane, H. J. Clavier, Francis Lake, Chas. A. Chapman, William Cartwright, George H. Browne, Frank Scanlan, N. D. Alma, D. M., F. Bishop, Bessie, G. S. P.,)
  2. col. 1[Publisher's note: Our cause wants men]
  3. col. 1[Letter from Buffalo, N. Y.] Elizabeth F. B——
  4. col. 1[Publisher's note: recruit subscriptions]
  5. col. 1[Publisher's note: a look into our mail bag]
  6. col. 1[Letter from Los Angeles, Cal.] A. Vinette
  7. col. 2[Letter from New York City] Henry C. Power
  8. col. 2[Letter from Ridgewood, N. J.] E. B. Crane
  9. col. 2[Letter from New Orleans] H. J. Clavier
  10. col. 2[Letter from Monroe, Mich.] A. B.
  11. col. 2[Letter from Dunkirk, N. Y.] Francis Lake
  12. col. 2[Letter from ——, Minn.]
  13. col. 2[Letter from Aspen, Col.] Chas. A. Chapman
  14. col. 2[Letter from Portland, Ore.] William Cartwright
  15. col. 2[Letter from Lowell, Mass.] George H. Browne
  16. col. 2[Letter from Philadelphia] Frank Scanlan
  17. col. 3[Letter from Chihuahua, Mexico] N. D. Alma
  18. col. 3[Letter from Sacramento, Cal.] D. M.
  19. col. 3[Letter from Los Angeles, Cal.]
  20. col. 3[Letter from Elmira, N. Y.] F. Bishop
  21. col. 3[Letter from Asbury Park] Bessie
  22. col. 3[Letter from Pittsburg, Pa.] G. S. P.
  23. col. 3[Publisher's note: There! Isn't that a lovely batch of letters?]
  24. col. 3[Publisher's note: the recruiting fund]
  25. col. 3★ The Testimony of a Protestant Religious Journal. (Ed.: New York Independent)
  26. col. 3★ It Is the Machine, and Not the Faith, that Protestants Object To. (Ed.: New York Independent)
  27. col. 3Is This Our Country or the English Nobiliyt's Country? (Ed.: Kansas City Star)
  28. col. 4The Land Belongs To All. B. M. Lawrence, M. D. (Ed.: R. M. Lawrence, M. D.)
  29. col. 4Rumors in the Enemy's Camp. (Ed.: New York World)
  30. col. 4Is Selfishness the Cause? (Ed.: New Jersey Unionist)
  31. col. 5LEGAL. TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Ernest L. Duncker; Henry Gut; John Ruckert
  32. col. 6★ A.— TO SECRETARIES OF TRADE AND LABOR ORGANIZATIONS AND LAND AND LABOR CLUBS. Henry George & Co.
  33. col. 6MEMBERS OF LABOR ORGANIZAtions and others wishing to canvass
  34. col. 6UNITED LABOR PARTY. NEW YORK TO THE COUNTRY. John McMackin (for the executive committee)
  35. col. 623RD ASSEMBLY DISTRICT MEETS every Monday evening.
  36. col. 6LAND AND LABOR PARTY. LAND AND LABOR. John McMackin (Chairman Central Committee)
  37. col. 6"THE NEW CRUSADERS."

Advertisements (20): CURE FOR THE DEAF · ALWAYS THE SAME. STRAITON & STORM'S CIGARS. · A HOT KITCHEN Can be avoided by using ADAMS & WESTLAKE'S OIL AND GAS STOVES. · JAMES BOGAN, PRINCIPAL AGENT for James Means' $3 and $4 shoes. · ANTI-POVERTY SOCIETY. · [S. Ulrich: cabinet photos of Pentecost, McGlynn and George · CO-OPERATIVE HAT STORE, · HOLLAND'S COFFEE AND DINING ROOMS, · PRINTING. CONCORD CO-OPERATIVE PRINTING COMPANY (Ld.), · COOGAN BROS., CARPET AND FURNITURE DEALERS, · [Braham's: WHO WOULDN'T BE DRESSED WELL · [Keystone Dust Proof Watches: IS THE BEST GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU? · LIFE SIZE PORTRAIT! · MAJOR'S CEMENT · TO CONSUMPTIVES · GOOD NEWS TO LADIES. · Piso's Remedy for Catarrh · PHOTOGRAPHERS. CHARLES B. SCHAIDNER, · DRESSMAKING. MRS. BRUNON · CO-OPERATIVE COLONY.

Full table with types and authors · About this text · PDF

Page 1 of 8contents

THE STANDARD

VOL. II.—NO. 1. | NEW YORK, SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887. | PRICE FIVE CENTS

p. 1, col. 1 [Note: the left edge of column 1 is cut off in the scan, losing the first one or two letters of most lines. Letters supplied in square brackets, e.g. “[a]nd”, are restorations of letters not visible in the scan.]

[T]HE COMING EXCOMMUNICATION.

Copy linkEdit

The Roman machine has acted promptly [a]nd boldly. Before midnight on the Fourth [o]f July the American press were informed [b]y cable that orders had been sent to the [a]rchbishop of New York to excommunicate Dr. McGlynn and to publish the de[cr]ee of 1 in the 2?3?4?5?6?8?

Details have at this writing not yet been [gi]ven to the public, but private information [is] to the effect that Archbishop Corrigan [ha]s been authorized by cable to excom[m]unicate his “rebellious subject” with the [m]ajor excommunication, declaring him [o]ne whom the faithful must avoid; that [t]he same major excommunication is to be [d]eclared against all Dr. McGlynn’s “sympathizers and abettors,” while the minor ex[co]mmunication is to be denounced against [a]ll who communicate with either Dr. Mc [G]lynn or those “sympathizers and abet[to]rs.”

[I]n taking this straightforward course [C]ardinal Simeoni and his associates of [th]e propaganda have acted in much [m]ore manly fashion than if they had [a]dopted the sneaking suggestion that has [b]een made here—to pretend that Dr. Mc[G]lynn had excommunicated himself ipso [f]acto. It will be well if Archbishop Cor[ri]gan will carry out his instructions in the [sa]me spirit. The occasion is important [en]ough to justify the most solemn and im[pr]essive ceremony that the resources of [th]e cathedral will enable him to get up. [L]ong after all else that he has yet done shall [be] forgotten the name of Corrigan will [be] remembered as that of the archbishop [w]ho excommunicated McGlynn.

The decision of Rome draws the line and [m]akes clear the issue between the Roman [hi]erarchy and the spirit of freedom. It is [a] suggestive coincidence that it should [h]ave been promulgated on the anniversary [of] the day made memorable by the great [d]eclaration, not merely of American inde[p]endence, but of the rights of man.

The immediate cause of Dr. McGlynn’s [ex]communication is his refusal to take his [po]litical orders from his archbishop his [a]ssertion that in becoming a priest he did [no]t evade the duties nor surrender the [ri]ghts of a man and a citizen, and his de[ni]al of the authority of bishop, propaganda [or] pope to order him to Italy to answer for [hi]s acts in American politics or his opinions [in] political economy. It is virtually a [d]eclaration, not from the highest authority [of] the Catholic church, but from the con[tro]lling power in the ecclesiastical “ma [c]hine,” that even in the United States the [C]atholic priest must be the political serf of [a] superior who owes his appointment to a [s]elf-perpetuating Italian ring, constantly [en]gaged in schemes for selling out the peo[pl]e whom they thus control to their op[p]ressors.

There is nothing in this ecclesiastical [ou]tlawry of the best known and best loved [o]f American priests to shake the belief of [C]atholics in the true essentials of the [C]atholic faith, but there is in it decisive [p]roof to the intelligent and devout Catho[li]c that the organization of his church has [f]allen into the hands of a machine which [is] determined to use it for base and selfish [p]urposes. There is nothing in it to show [t]he non-Catholic that the Catholic religion [i]s in itself inconsistent with political liberty [a]nd human progress, but it is the strongest [d]emonstration that the ecclesiasticism [w]hich, in the name of religion, imposes its [f]etters upon ignorance and superstition, [a]nd which in this country seeks the [a]lliance of bosses, as in Europe it does that [o]f kings, is the deadly foe of civil as [o]f religious liberty.

Archbishop Corrigan, in insisting upon [t]he implicit political obedience of his [p]riests, had probably at sic lar[g]er in view than the use of his ecclesiasti[c]al power as his allies, the Tammany [b]osses, use political patronage; and in sus[t]aining him by excommunicating Dr. Mc[G]lynn the Italian cardinals have doubtless [h]ad primarily in view the maintenance of [t]he political control of their “subjects,” as [n]ecessary to the game they are playing in [E]uropean diplomacy. But beyond all, this [e]xcommunication is the culminating proof [t]hat I was right when, in the first issue of [t]his paper, I said that American workingmen [m]ight as well make up their minds that in [t]heir fight for the enfranchisement of labor [t]hey must meet the opposition of the Cath[o]lic hierarchy.

The pro-poverty papers and especially [t]hose which have been previously noted [f]or their bitter hostility to everything [C]atholic, are chuckling with delight over [t]he impending excommunication. The [v]ery depth of their contempt for “ignorant [a]nd superstitious Catholics” gives them [f]irm faith in the efficacy of excommunica[t]ion as a political weapon. Just as they predicted that suspension would utterly destroy the influence of the priest who insisted on declaring that God made this earth for all His children, so, with re[n]ewed faith in Catholic slavishness, they are now predicting that, threatened with the “curse of Rome,” every Catholic will flee from Dr. McGlynn as from a leper, and his non-Catholic followers will then desert him from fear of exciting the animosity of Catholics. The spectacle which their fancy presents of the open-handed minister of Christ whose whole life has been one succession of deeds of charity, who has never spared himself to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and comfort p. 1, col. 2 the distressed, being actually reduced to want for the very necessaries of life, fills them with a delight that washes away all the hatred they have ever felt toward “popery,” and substitutes for fear of “Romish aggression” the warmest admiration of Rome’s power.

The Post has at last found a boycott of which it thoroughly approves, and thus it rejoices:

The formal excommunication of McGlynn has been ordered from Rome, and will in due time be published by the archbishop. It will be interesting from this date to watch the sure and rapid disappearance of McGlynn as a “force” in politics. Nobody ought to be better able to calculate the time required for this than McGlynn, but he seems not to have been able to realize what he was calling down upon his own head. So long as he was merely in dispute with the local church authorities he was able to have followers and sympathizers, both in and out of his own church, but from the moment he is excommunicated all will be changed. No 7 Catholic can follow him after that, and as his following which is not Catholic is political, that, too, will drop away from him, for no political organization can afford to have him for a member. He may go on for a while abolishing poverty, but it will not be long before his own poverty will be the most serious problem confronting him.

And thus does the Times conclude a long tirade of misrepresentation and insult:

Whatever pity may be felt for Dr. McGlynn by any right minded person must be felt in spite of the knowledge that his fate is deserved. He has not only deserved, but invited it, and he has nobody but himself to blame that his career is closed and his life ruined.

Let these pro-poverty prophets wait a while, and they will see these predictions prove as false as those they made when Dr. McGlynn was suspended, and again, when he was evicted. They count too much on “Catholic superstition.”

The truth is, that if there are in the United States any Catholics so ignorant and superstitious as journals like the Post and Times fondly imagine all Catholics to be, they are already on the side of Corrigan, and not of McGlynn. Upon the Catholics who have supported Dr. McGlynn, and who have resented the attempt to control their politics through their religion, the excommunication upon which Tammany hall and the pro-poverty press are counting so much will have no more effect than the apocryphal “bull against the comet,” unless it be to make them take a more determined stand.

The Catholic faith, in which so many wise and just and true men have believed and yet believe; the Catholic faith which has numbered so many sages and heroes and martyrs, is, no matter how much craft may have sought to use it to impose on ignorance, something more than an African voodooism varnished with a gloss of Christian names and phrases. And whatever may have been the beliefs entertained in places or times of general ignorance and superstition, the intelligent American Catholics who are standing side by side with Dr. McGlynn do not believe that it is within the power of archbishop, propaganda or pope to really cut either him or them off from the church because they refuse to take their politics from Tammany or from Italy, or to consign them to everlasting flames in another world because they refuse to give up the belief that God intends some portion in this world for every child that He brings into it.

But this the excommunication will do: It will convince such Catholics that a system of church government which deprives the people of all choice of their priest, and deprives the priests of all choice of their bishop, and concentrates all the power of the organization in the hands of a self-perpetuating ring of Italians, is a disgrace to the church and a scandal and injury to true religion.

Edward McGlynn is to be excommunicated. So far as a forty thousand dollar archbishop and a triple crowned pope and a ring of money grabbing Italian cardinals can do it, he is to be while living cut off from the communion of the church he has loved and served, and after death consigned to eternal torments. What for? Because he has been negligent of his priestly duty? Because he has been unseemly in his life or impure in his conversation? Because he has denied any article of faith taught by the church? There are no such charges. His real offense, for it is out of this that even his getting into the way of Tammany grew, is that he has refused to regard poverty as a divine institution—that he has held and taught that if we would only apply the Golden Rule to the making of our laws; if we would only consent to treat each other as brethren equally entitled to share in the bounty of a common Father, we could find on this earth which He has provided; enough and more than enough for us all—and that no one need go hungry, and no one want for clothing, and no one be crowded into unwholesome lodgings, and no one be oppressed by long toil, and all have an opportunity to develop body and mind in due symmetry. And for seeing this revelation of God’s justice and beneficence, as Galileo saw the revelation of the solar system—for seeing this, and refusing to deny it, a man whose twenty-five years of priesthood have been unmarked by stain or blemish; a man who stands to-day the best known and best loved of all the Catholic priests of America, is to be cut off from the Catholic church, so far as archbishop, propaganda and pope can cut him off.

Well may “his grace,” the archbishop of New York, make the excommunication of such a man at the command of “his p. 1, col. 3 [The poem “Under the Ban” is set across the tops of columns 3 and 4.]

UNDER THE BAN.

Copy linkEdit

ROME, July 4.—Orders have been sent to the archbishop of New York to excommunicate the Rev. Dr. McGlynn and to publish the decree of excommunication in the 9?

(Air—“Old 15.”)

The heaven of heavens, is Thine, O Lord,
The earth thou gav’st to feed our race;
We follow fast Thy faithful word,
We preach Thy truth in every place.

The poor, oppressed by man’s 16,
Have cursed in rage Thy holy name;
Forgive them, Father, let the light
Of our bright Cross Thy truth proclaim,

Of old, men stoned Thy chosen priests,
Who sought their fellow-men to bless;
They robbed the poor for sumptuous feasts,
And dwelt in marble palaces.

So now in Christ’s dear name they curse
The Christ-like man, who told Thy love;
Thou wilt their angry doom reverse,
And Balaam’s curse a blessing prove.

Bless from Thy shining sapphire throne
The just, who reverence Thy laws;
Though scribe and pharisee disown,
Bless Thou Thy priest, and bless our cause.

We follow where Thy footsteps trod;
We preach, though under Pilate’s ban,
The glorious fatherhood of God—
The holy brotherhood of man!

J. ANKETELL.

[continued from column 2]

eminence” Cardinal Simeoni, by authority of “his holiness,” the wearer of three crowns, in a cathedral dedicated to the carpenter’s son, and hung around with pictures of his passion and cruel death, an occasion for display and ceremony. If he decides to treat the society saviors of New York to a spectacle that will delight them as greatly as did Nero’s illuminated gardens delight the society saviors of ancient Rome, he should have not only twelve priests, but all who signed his memorial, to extinguish their lighted candles and throw them on the floor as they echo “Fiat! fiat! fiat!” to his curse.

Consider the conditions of society here in New York as there in Italy and yonder in Ireland, and wherever in short our so-called Christian civilization is reaching anything approaching full development. Consider the armies, the fleets, the policemen, the prisons, the workhouses. Consider the wanton luxury of the rich, gorged to satiety, and morally rotting amid profusion; consider the squalid want of the poor, and the vices and the crimes bred of it; consider the tramps, the prostitutes, the thieves, the gamblers, the courts, the swindlers; consider the long toil and scant fare of those on whom the hard work of all other classes is thrown; consider the corruption of government, the morals of trade, the ideals of success that are set before the young. Consider that in human society such as this it is utterly impossible for any one to follow the bidding of Christ and to do to others as he would have them do unto him. Consider how the workman must oft-times snatch employment and the poor bread it brings, from another to support his own; how the manufacturer must grind others’ children lest his own come to want; how the trader must drive a sharp bargain or fail himself; how the rich man must steel his heart or become a pauper; how the trustful must learn to look on all men as rogues; how the good Samaritan must pass by on the other side if he would ever reach his journey’s end. If this be the only possible human society, was not Christ a fool when he told men to love one another, and trust one another, and to treat one another as they would have others treat them—when he told them that they need no more worry and fret about what they should eat, and what they should drink, and wherewithal they should be clothed than do the lilies of the field?

Consider who is to be excommunicated, and what he is to be excommunicated for, and who is to do the excommunicating?

The man who is to be excommunicated is a man who all his life has been known as a friend of the poor; who is followed by the oppressed and loved by the heavy burdened. He is to be excommunicated for saying and insisting that human society as it exists to-day is not the human society that God intended; for declaring that the poverty, the vice, the greed and the crime that exist to-day are not due to the Creator’s bungling, but to the fact that we have founded our social structure on a fundamental injustice, and make the bounties and opportunities that the All-Father has provided for all His children the absolute property of a few. And the man who is to do the excommunicating—he is called by a name of honor; he lives in a marble palace, and is clothed in purple and fine linen, and people kneel down to kiss his hand. He holds that society as it is to-day is the divinely appointed and only proper society; he holds that the want and greed and vice and crime that spring from poverty are divinely ordained that the scripture may be fulfilled, “The poor ye have always with you.”

Consider these things. Read the gospel that tells of a certain proceeding had before another high priest eighteen centuries ago, and say, as between what is represented by archbishop, propaganda and pope on the one side and what is represented by the simple priest whom they propose to excommunicate on the other side, which stands for the Christianity of Christ?

It would be well for the archbishop to p. 1, col. 4 provide good accommodations for reporters when he excommunicates Dr. McGlynn. People far and near will on the next day like to read full details of it, and how everybody looked. And perhaps some one might like to refer to these accounts some years thereafter.

The state convention called by the united labor party to meet in Syracuse on the 17th of August, promises to be a large and notable gathering. Already in 101 out of the 128 assembly districts of the state of New York the united labor party is organized or in the process of organization, and the Syracuse convention will embrace delegates from almost, if not quite every assembly district in the state. Those men will be delegates, chosen by citizens who believe in the principles set forth in the call for the convention, and prepared to vote for its nominees —not, as have been the components of so many of the conventions that have essayed to manufacture new parties, mere self-appointed representatives of conflicting views and 10.

The importance of this convention is that it will make the first formal state organization upon a principle on which the political contests of the immediate future in the United States are certain to be waged—a principle which will ultimately sweep the country as surely as to-morrow’s sun will rise. This the politicians of the two old parties do not yet understand. They have been so long accustomed to regard politics as a mere struggle for office; so long accustomed to see attempts to manufacture third parties come to naught, and efforts to concentrate for political action the discontent of the working masses miserably fail, that they are blind to all the signs of the times. They still imagine that the movement to abolish poverty and bring to an end industrial slavery by securing equal rights to land, which entered the stage of practical politics in last fall’s municipal election in New York is as 11 as have been the sporadic labor movements which during the last ten or fifteen years have now and again carried a local election only to subside again.

They will discover their mistake only when they shall have been driven together or overwhelmed. The party which holds its first state convention on the 17th of August is yet in its infancy, but while the two old parties that have hitherto struggled for supremacy are dead and disintegrating, it is alive and growing. It is crystalizing around a great principle; it has a definite policy. It knows just what it wants, and how to get it. Every day adds to its members; every day heightens its enthusiasm; every day increases its confidence in itself and its faith in its destiny, and every day the issue which it presents becomes more and more clearly the issue on one side or the other of which every American must ere long take his stand.

What is called the union labor party amounts in New York to nothing whatever, except a skeleton organization such as those of the humbug labor parties that were started here during the last municipal election to bleed politicians and resolute for publication. In the west it amounts, in some places, to a respectable body, composed, however, of incongruous materials, without any real bond of union, and engineered mostly by professional “labor politicians.” Its fate, however, is everywhere to melt away before the party of a definite idea, or to come over to it bodily by adopting its principles. A compromise milk-and-water platform, such as was adopted by the conference of all sorts of people who manufactured the union labor party in 12? in February, or such as was adopted at the union labor convention in Ohio on Tuesday will neither provoke opposition nor invite support. The united labor or anti-poverty men are organizing through the west as they organized a state executive in Cincinnati on the Fourth, and very shortly after the Syracuse convention the nucleus of a national organization will be formed. Between the party organized to carry out an idea and the party organized p. 1, col. 5 for the sake of forming a party, there is no question which will swallow the other.

For a party of aggression the shorter platform and the fewer ideas brought forward the better. Political issues are joined at one point, and the tool cuts best that has the sharpest edge. When a central and inclusive idea furnishes a rallying point, anything more weakens instead of strengthening it.

The talk that has suddenly sprung up about restricting or prohibiting European immigration is significant of two or three things. It is significant of the consciousness on the part of the protected rings that the old style of “protecting American labor” by shutting out foreign goods has lost its charm for the American laborer, and that he must be offered the whole Chinese system as the only hope of getting him to agree to continue the half of it. It is significant also of the fact that the conditions of labor are steadily becoming harder in the United States in spite of all the pleasant statistics of the Atkinsons. And it is significant, moreover, of a growing consciousness on the part of the propertied classes that something must be done if the rapid growth of radical ideas on the land question is not to speedily sweep everything before it.

But what is T. V. Powderly, master workman of the Knights of Labor, doing in advocating the restriction of immigration as a panacea for the ills of labor?

Mr. Powderly, according to the reports, devoted his Fourth of July address to this subject, and in a letter to the Scranton Truth claims that “no laborer who lands on American soil from a foreign country under existing conditions, without visible means of support, will own a home of his own within the next fifty years.” He further says:

The conditions which surrounded the immigrant of fifty, twenty-five or even ten years ago were far different from those surrounding the poor fellow who lands to-day, and among the men who cry out against immigration to-day are thousands who landed no longer ago than ten years. Improved machinery and new inventions have within the last twenty-five years made it possible for one man to do the work of three, and in many instances the work of ten. In every case where the machine has made it possible for a man to do in a day what it required three men to do before, two out of every three must look elsewhere for a means of earning a livelihood. Twenty-five years have witnessed the absorption of our public lands by syndicates, native and alien. Bonanza farming on the one hand and land speculation on the other have made it impossible for the two men who have been displaced by the machine to go upon the land and earn a living. They must remain in the town or city. To-day we witness a marvelous increase in the population of our cities and an alarming decrease in the population of our farming districts—that is, the agricultural population does not by any means keep proportionate pace with the population of mining, manufacturing and mechanical centers. All this tends to show that something must be done to equalize our population.

Of course it does. But that “something” ought to be done to remove the cause, and that cause Mr. Powderly sees with evident clearness is land monopoly. Land monopoly, and not any scarcity of land, is the reason why the immigrant cannot find a home of his own, and why it “is impossible for the two men who have been displaced by the machine to go upon the land and earn a living.” Why should not Mr. Powderly lend his great influence to urge on the movement for throwing land open to labor by concentrating taxes on its values, rather than aid in “drawing a red herring across the trail” of true reform by advocating a policy opposed both to the genius of American institutions and the catholic spirit of the Knights of Labor?

HENRY GEORGE.

The “Isolated” Priest in Milwaukee.

The Catholic clergy of Milwaukee were active last week in warning their parishioners to stay away from the meeting of July 4, which was to be addressed by Dr. McGlynn. Their admonitions, however, had but little effect, for when the doctor presented himself on the platform in the Shooting park fully 10,000 people were present, very many of whom were 13?14?

Dr. McGlynn spoke for nearly an hour and a half, and the frequent outbursts of applause among the audience were a tribute to his eloquence. On July 5 he addressed a meeting in Racine, Wis., and was to return to Milwaukee to deliver a lecture on July 6.

A Right Divine.

PAWTUCKET, R. I.—I have been a reader of THE STANDARD from its first issue, and I must say it suits me well. I have made several converts, and intend making more. Some of our clergymen are cracking their brains perusing the Bible for something to bolster up land monopoly. But the rights of so-called property are insignificant when compared with the right of human beings to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

CATHOLIC.

Earnest Men in Lancaster, Pa.

LANCASTER, Pa., June 26.—Seven of us in earnest to spread the light of the doctrines of “the land for the people” held a conference on Sunday, and will form an organization next Sunday. The new gospel is taking hold of men and making them terribly in earnest. We shall push the work by means of THE STANDARD and tracts and by speeches.

HENRY W. STEIN.

sic Slavery in Africa.

The explorer, Henry M. Stanley, is said to have acquired by purchase of the native chiefs several of the most commanding sites and large tracts of the richest territory in Africa, which he intends to hold by title, trusting to time to make it remunerative. He took the precaution to have white witnesses to all his sic, which were verified by written instruments. The consideration given was, of course, comparatively trifling.

The McGlynn Fund.

THE STANDARD acknowledges the receipt of $2 for the Dr. McGlynn fund from H. H. Bryant, Somerville, Mass.
p. 1, col. 6

ST. BERNARD AND EDWARD MᶜGLYNN.

A Thoughtful Letter from a Catholic Priest—An Illustration from the History of St. Bernard.

—— ——. In putting himself on the side of the oppressed against the oppressor, on the side of the slave against the master, of the poor against the rich, the right against the wrong, Dr. McGlynn has brought down upon himself the thunder of his ecclesiastical superior and the abuse and hostility of a class of individuals who have grown fat from the toil of their fellows.

It is said that he has been condemned because he heretically taught the equal right of all to land! But when has this subject been defined as a point of Catholic dogma? A future council and a future pope have yet to do that.

Was there not a time when the doctrine of the immaculate conception of the Blessed Virgin was a matter of free discussion and of bitter controversy between the schools? Who does not know how strenuously the great St. 1718?19?20? contended against that doctrine? Did he make shipwreck in the faith? Whoever dared call him a heretic? Every divine in the church, from the day of the first Pentecost till December, 1859, was free to take issue on the score when, where and with whomsoever he pleased. Were they heretics? So it was also in regard to the doctrine of the infallibility of the pope. Every man had his free say about it until the doctrine was defined as an article of faith. Now, has Dr. McGlynn done anything more than St. Bernard did? Why has he been degraded then from his position and set adrift as a heretic or something of the kind? The land question is yet as free as the air we breathe. The Catholic church has never set her seal of final judgment upon it. Not only that; she has never brought the subject into her council chambers for discussion. And until Rome shall have set her seal against it Dr. McGlynn should not be condemned.

God in His merciful wisdom never intended that one man or one set of men should possess the earth to the exclusion of all the rest. The Heavenly Father disinherits none of His children. They are all equally the object of His tender love and compassion. What other doctrine than this has Dr. McGlynn taught? What other doctrine than this have the illustrious bishop of Meath and the great archbishop of Cashel taught? These great pillars of the church have not been condemned.

But the sentence of decapitation has been pronounced, and now is heard the cry: “Go to Rome, go to Rome.” Go to Rome after decapitation! Go to Rome to be treated to sackcloth and ashes! “But,” it is said, “the pope might deal more favorably and condone the crime.” But I answer, there has been no crime. Suppose there had been a crime. Was Dr. McGlynn not entitled to trial before sentence?

The archbishop of New York has set himself up as an absolute dictator. The voice of justice and the voice of mankind are to go for naught.

There was once a great French 2122?. It bore down everything before it like a mighty flood tumbling down to the sea. In a brief moment, the sins, the iniquities, the injustices and the abominations of a century were washed out of existence. Rulers of the church of God, take heed! The cup is nearly full. A French revolution may burst forth again. We pray an end of Cæsarism in this country before the flood gates of wrath and outraged justice may burst open upon you. We have satis 23 of your revealed and unrevealed acts of tyranny and injustice. I, a simple priest, give this advice as “an ounce of prevention.”

For over one hundred years the Catholic church has enjoyed supreme peace in these United States. The misdeeds of its rulers have been hidden. No storms or tempests reached them. Imperialism, Cæsarism, flourished in all its brazen effrontery. Vengeance and extinction pursued the 24. “Open your mouth, sir, and we crush the life out of you. Our arrows of death will go with you to the extremities of the earth. Anathemas will be your last requiem. Starvation and a pauper’s grave will be your final inheritance.”

Who was hero enough to resist this dread decree? None, until the great soul, Edward McGlynn, stepped forward into the arena. But, oh, the odds are terrible. A most powerful enemy a hundred years old, an enemy well fortified, admirably skilled in the tactics of war, abundantly supplied with pecuniary resources, animated with great courage and flushed with the halo of a 25 victories.

Let the guilty ones take heed. They have sown the wind; they may reap the whirlwind.

The Catholic people of this republic of the United States want to see their church purged of its Cæsarism; purged of the worldliness, the royalty and the splendor of its rulers. Jesus Christ, the Son of the eternal Father, had not a place to lay his head.

A CATHOLIC PRIEST.

Give Capital and Labor a Chance.

EVANSVILLE, Ind.—Probably no city in the United States has more need to study the science of taxation than tax-ridden Evansville. At one of the citizens’ meetings last spring, a citizen urged the land owners not to frighten capital out of the city by running up the price of land. But he might as well have carried his strong statements and clear logic down to the levee and appealed to the Ohio river, begging it not to run into the Mississippi. Of course he was right. We need capital, we need manufacturers. The manufacturers need our coal, our gas, our convenient means of transport, our fertile outlying country, and all our natural advantages. But the land owners control the situation. What a boom there would be in Evansville if the taxes which bear so heavily upon every form of useful investment were shifted upon land values. How rapidly houses would go up. And workingmen would not have to wait so many years to save money to build a little home.

The man who builds a good house is as much a benefactor to his race as the man who makes two blades of grass grow where one grew before. He ought not to be punished by a tax from which his neighbor, who will neither build himself nor allow any one else to build, is sic.

N. D.

Can’t Keep a Copy of “The Standard” Long.

EXETER, Neb., June 10.—Inclosed find one dollar for the Anti-poverty society. You can put me down as a member. I want to be enrolled under the banner of Rev. Dr. McGlynn’s crusade. He is the teacher of truth and the friend of humanity. God bless him! Please send me some information to start a labor organization here. I take THE STANDARD, but I can’t keep a copy long, because many others want to read it.

EDWARD COSTELLO.

Page 2 of 8contents

2 THE STANDARD, SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887.

p. 2, col. 1

ANTI-POVERTY.

AN ENTHUSIASTIC MEETING, NOTWITHSTANDING THE HOT WEATHER.

A Stirring Address by Rev. C. M. Winchester of Middletown, N. Y.—Thoughtful Words on the Pope-Corrigan Situation by Michael Clarke—John McMackin Speaks for the United Labor Party—“Let Them Excommunicate if They Dare.”

The excessive heat and the fact that a vast number of people left the city on Saturday for the Fourth of July, would have rendered it impossible to get together any considerable number of people on Sunday evening for any ordinary purpose; but the purposes of the Anti-poverty society are far from ordinary or commonplace, and the throng at the Academy of Music on Sunday night showed how effectively the gospel of the new crusade has taken hold of the hearts of the people.

Mr. Michael Clarke acted as chairman, and the Concordia chorus, under the leadership of Miss Munier, was present in almost undiminished numbers.

Mr. T. L. McCready, the chairman of the executive committee, made a few remarks, explaining the urgent need of the society for funds, and appealing to the audience to do all in their power to help the cause along. “The sphere of work of the Anti-poverty society,” he said, “is widening day by day. We have constant daily appeals to us from other places for tracts and information. Three clerks are already employed, and there is work for more. But tracts and clerk hire and postage require money, and unless the good people who attend the public meetings of the society will furnish the money, the work of the society must be curtailed.”

The chairman then introduced the Rev. C. M. Winchester of Middletown, N. Y., who was welcomed with prolonged sic,

In his opening remarks Mr. Winchester alluded to the recent visit of Dr. McGlynn to the city where he lived, and spoke of the immense interest the Anti-poverty society was exciting throughout the country.

“This cause,” he said, “is gaining, growing—gaining the land. That is what we all are for. Now, what is poverty? Let us begin at the bottom of this matter. Let us see what poverty is. Some people think that poverty is what this illustrated newspaper (showing a page of the New York World) makes it out. If you noticed it to-day, you will have seen a picture of one of your tenement houses, and somebody putting a lot of second-hand furniture in the rain, while a poor woman and her children are weeping that they are obliged to vacate a place that a beast ought not to live in. That is not the only kind of poverty. I look upon this audience to-night, and I hope you will not be offended if I say that the greater part of you are in poverty. sic.) I know I am in poverty, and I am not ashamed to own it, as long as it is true; but I am ashamed to own it, considering all the natural resources God has given to the people. Poverty is the want of any necessity of life or of any luxury that the Creator has given to His children.

“I met a judge last evening who has been our county judge in the past. He is now a lawyer, comes down and spends the week in your city and then returns home on Friday or Saturday to spend the time with his children. He is a very able lawyer, and—are there any lawyers here?—he is as near an honest lawyer as any could be and live. (Uproarious laughter.) He has a pleasant, comfortable home, just about a medium home, and he just about makes a comfortable living. If he should die he has perhaps a small policy of life insurance. I don’t know whether it would pay off the mortgage on his house or not. What can he do toward setting his children out in life? He is in actual poverty, as I understand poverty. He has not the necessary conveniences to bring up his children in the sort of life that everybody has a right to be in, for everybody has a right to be comfortable, and nobody has a right to make anybody else less than comfortable. (Applause.)

“The Lord bless the rich; the poor can beg.” (Laughter.) That is about the prevailing idea—that the Lord is peculiarly favorable to the rich and the poor may beg or live the best they can. There are some people who think that God took of the dust of the earth and screened it, and out of the best part of it made some men, and out of the rest made the poor. (Laughter.) So it has got to be thought really true in this world that God wants a part of the people to be poor so that the rich can show their bowels of mercy and be charitable. (Laughter.)

“That is about the height that the Christian sentiment of this century has risen to—that God wants people to be poor. (Applause.) And I am glad that that wonderful Catholic church, from which have come some of the best men the world ever saw, has brought to the front a man who is willing to bear the reproach of the world in order to proclaim the truth that all men are brethren, and that God is the Father of them all. (Tumultuous applause.) Now, I ought to be the last man, and I will be the last man, to say anything against the church; against any church. Every church in this land is needed. In my mind I have no opposition to any church. I am not a Protestant, I am not a Catholic, but I am trying to be a human being (wild applause); and I shall stand, I trust, firm and true to that God who made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on all the face of this glorious earth of ours (applause), and means them to have the use of the earth while they dwell on it. (Applause.)

“Now the churches, and I say it with all kindness, have been too much taken up with what men call theology, and they have had so much to do to sharpen their swords and their spears to fight one another about doctrines and creeds and isms, that they haven’t had time to talk about the things that pertain to humanity. (Applause.) The religion of the churches of to-day is well typified by their tall steeples. Their religion, like the steeples, is so lofty that it is of very little practical use. (Laughter and applause.) You would think, to hear them, that when our Heavenly Father brought into being these millions on the face of the earth, it was only that they might finally get into heaven some way—squeeze in somehow. I protest against that as a most terrible humbug. (Applause.) God made the earth for the solid enjoyment of the people as long as they can stay upon it, and after that He has promised them a new heaven and a new earth on which the righteous can dwell. (Applause.) I am glad to see so many young men and young maidens, raising the cry of ‘The land for the people.’ It was God who gave the land for the people, and I hope that they will continue to shout that chorus until the glorious stars and stripes shall wave over a land where every man, woman and child shall have a share of the common bounty. (Applause.)

“The fertility of the soil, the productiveness of the soil, teaches me that our heavenly father never intended to have poverty. Take one good ear of corn. Just look at it, rich and golden! What are the possibilities of one ear of corn? Does it bring forth an ear? Does it increase as slowly as the human race in p. 2, col. 2 creases? No indeed. One ear, well planted and with simple cultivation, brings a rich reward of ripe, waving corn. So with all production. God has implanted the life principle that seems to say with the waving of every blade of grain, with the waving of every field of wheat, let there be no poverty in this world of yours, my children, for the land God gave to the children of men. (Applause.)

“Now, in the midst of plenty, in the midst of the provisions that God has made, the most amazing thing for a Christian to look upon is the intense suffering and poverty that everywhere stares us in the face. What makes all this poverty? There are some lazy people. Yes, that is so. I have nothing to say for the lazy man. (Applause.) Another says, so many are intemperate. Well, I suppose that is so. But I am bound to say that if you should do away with all the intemperance in the land, the same evils of poverty that afflict us now would still continue to exist. (Applause.) People would be just as badly off as they are now. They are able to live now, to support their wives and children, and at the same time to help support the liquor dealer’s wife and children; and if the expense of the liquor dealer’s family should be lifted from them, the employers would simply say: ‘These fellows can get along on less money than we are now paying them. Cut their wages down. They can live on less money now than when they were drinking.’ That is what would happen.

“The measure of a man’s wages is what the majority of people in the same occupation can live on, for the simple reason that if he tries to get more some other fellow who is out of a job will come forward and offer to work for just the sum that will enable him to live without saving anything. The slave gets his food, and clothing, and house room, and an allowance for beer and whisky. If all the slaves should stop using beer and whisky they would simply get no allowance for it.

Now, the Anti-poverty society steps sic and says, ‘No more of this robbery.’ (Applause.) And let the robbery of the land stop as the first thing. (Applause.) We say to-night that no man living has a title to the land that runs back to the original owner of the land. The time is coming when the citizens will rise up and say to the man who is holding a great tract of land, Show us your title to the land. They will say, ‘My title dates back to the Dutch who first came over.’ ‘Where did they get it?’ ‘They got a patent,’ or, ‘My title to it runs back to Roger Williams or his friends.’ ‘Where did they get it?’ ‘They bought it from the Indians for a chew of tobacco.’ (Laughter.) ‘How did they get the title?’ They turn over the Bible that they are so pious about, and the Bible says that the land belongs to God. (Applause.)

“I am thankful that this tide of public opinion is rising higher and higher. You couldn’t get in any church in this city half as many people as are here to-night. (Applause.) I was really astonished when I saw this audience. If the preachers of this city want to fill up all their churches and crowd them full, let them talk of the burning question of the hour—the land for the people.” (Long continued applause.)

“Mr. Winchester closed his sic with a stirring peroration, hailing the advent of the hour when the moving principle of society should be”Peace on earth, good will to men,” and the earth should witness the sic of the Savior’s prayer—“Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

The chairman then arose, and in a few well considered words reminded the audience that the date set by the ecclesiastical authorities of the Catholic church for the excommunication of the president of the Anti-poverty society had arrived.

“They may,” said Mr. Clarke, “commit the folly and the outrage of excommunicating Dr. McGlynn (hisses), for it seems that there is no limit to their capabilities in the direction of folly and injustice and contempt for the feelings and rights of the people. (Applause.) In view of such a contingency, it is well for us to keep clearly before our minds the true facts of the case, and to have a clear understanding of the real position.

“If they excommunicate Dr. McGlynn they will excommunicate him for teaching certain doctrines upon the land question. Now, what are those doctrines that Dr. McGlynn has been preaching? I don’t propose detaining you for many minutes; but as this is a question of some importance, I repeat it is well for us to keep clearly before our minds the real facts of the case. What are the doctrines that Dr. McGlynn has been teaching, and for the teaching of which he has been threatened with excommunication? (A voice: ‘He has been teaching the truth.’) I will give you a brief statement of those doctrines, not in my words, but in the words of a very able, a very learned and very eminent theologian of the Catholic church, whose name I shall mention to you presently.

“This is the statement: The land of every country is the common property of the people of that country, because its real owner, the sic who made it, has transferred it as a voluntary gift to them. The land He has given to the children of men. Now, as every individual is a creature and a child of God, and as all His creatures are equal in His sight, any settlement of the land of a country that would exclude the humblest man in that country from his share of the common inheritance would be not only an injustice and a wrong to that man, but, moreover, would be an impious resistance to the benevolent intentions of the Creator. (Great applause.)

“This is precisely the doctrine that Dr. McGlynn has been teaching; no more and no less. And who was it that wrote those words that I have read? They were written by Dr. Thomas Nulty, the present Catholic bishop of the diocese of Meath in Ireland. (Great applause.) They were written by Dr. Nulty in a letter addressed by him in 1881 to the clergy and laity of his diocese. And what, ladies sic, is the position of our case in the light of those remarkable words? The position is this: That a Catholic priest in New York has been suspended, and is threatened with excommunication, for teaching the very same doctrines that a Catholic bishop in Ireland has taught without a word of censure. (Applause.)

“Now, I would ask the editors of the New York papers who have been so zealous in their defense of Archbishop Corrigan (hisses and groans long drawn out), and the pope (a voice: ‘They are jealous of him!’), I would ask those defenders of Archbishop Corrigan and the pope to explain to us the gross inconsistency to which I now direct their attention. They have been saying that Dr. McGlynn has been teaching doctrines condemned by the Catholic church, and that, therefore, he deserves the punishment he has got. Will they tell us why it is that Dr. Nulty was not excommunicated in 1881?

“Surely it cannot be wrong for a Catholic priest in New York to preach doctrines which it is not wrong for a Catholic bishop in Ireland to preach. (A voice: ‘There is no Tammany hall in Ireland.’ This sentiment evoked great applause.) The Catholic church, as we all know, claims that her teaching is one and the same in all countries and at all times.

“The catechism, from which, when I was a boy, I learned the rudiments of the Catholic religion, contained this question: ‘What are the marks and signs of the true church?’ And the answer was: ‘The true church is one, holy, Catholic, apostolic.’ (The same voice: ‘There is a revised edition by Tammany hall.’ Applause and merriment.) And p. 2, col. 3 in explanation of the marked oneness the catechism told us that the church was one, inasmuch as her teaching throughout all the ages and in all nations was one and the same.

“Now, I would ask Archbishop Corrigan (hisses and groans) and his defenders to tell us where this oneness comes in in the case of Dr. McGlynn as contrasted with case of Dr. sic. I do not suppose that they will answer the question. I do not suppose that they will tell us why Dr. Nulty was not censured for preaching what Dr. McGlynn is now censured for preaching.

“But we can tell them why. We can tell them why Dr. Nulty was not excommunicated in 1881. The gentlemen at the Vatican dared not do it, because they knew that Dr. Nulty had the Irish race at his back. (Applause.) They knew that if they were to excommunicate Dr. Nulty for giving expression to his opinions on the land question, they would have a schism in the Irish church.

“Now, I think that we in America ought to be able to teach those gentlemen at the Vatican a lesson similar to that taught them six years ago in Ireland. (Applause). And I think that we are at present in a proper spirit and in a proper frame of mind to teach them a very stern lesson upon that question. (Applause.) I think that if they excommunicate Dr. McGlynn, they will have to excommunicate one or two more of us. (Great applause.) I believe that they will have to excommunicate millions of American Catholics if they excommunicate Dr. McGlynn. (Tumultuous applause.)

What a monstrous claim it sic that they make upon us. They claim that we Catholics should have less liberty in political affairs than our non-Catholic fellow citizens; that while men of other creeds should have full liberty to think and act and speak as they please on public questions, we Catholics should have only that measure of freedom which Archbishop Corrigan and the pope may choose to accord to us. (Hisses and groans.) I refuse, as a Catholic, to occupy such a humiliating position. I should be ashamed to look in the face of my non-Catholic fellow citizen with such a brand of inferiority stamped upon my brow. (Great applause.) I could not expect my non-Catholic fellow citizen to respect me as a man were I such a slave and a recreant as to render up to the keeping of any ignorant; sic to political superiority my God-given liberty of conscience and judgment on the political affairs of my country. (Applause.) I shall never be such a slave. The Catholics of America will never be such slaves. (Great applause.) I speak for Catholics—I think I may venture to say I speak for thousands and millions of Catholics when I say this: That so long as the breath of life is in our bodies we will never yield up to pope, propaganda or bishop one jot or tittle of our full rights as American citizens. (Great and long continued applause.)

“This is our answer to the threat of excommunication. This is the vow that from this Anti-poverty society platform we send up to heaven here to-night. We are resolved, excommunication or no excommunication, to stand firmly and steadfastly by Dr. McGlynn. (A moment’s silence, followed by shouts of applause and cheers.)

“Ladies and gentlemen, they cannot put us out of the church. There are as good and as true and devoted Catholics in this Anti-poverty society as any of those who are among the friends and defenders of Archbishop Corrigan. (Hisses and groans.) We claim a right in the Catholic church as strong and as well founded as their right. (A voice: ‘We are more entitled to it than they are.’) The Catholic church was not founded to be a monopoly of archbishops and cardinals. (A voice: ‘We want a democratic pope.’ Applause.) It was instituted for the people, and the people have a right to its benefits. We claim the sacraments of the Catholic church—we who are Catholics—not as a privilege or a favor, but as a God-given right which no cardinal archbishop sic, upon a flimsy pretext, deprive us of.

“Once for all, then, fellow Catholics, our answer and our ultimatum upon this matter of excommunication is this: Let them excommunicate if they dare! (Great applause.) If they put Dr. McGlynn out of the church, they put us out of the church. (Great applause.) Wherever Dr. McGlynn takes his stand, we take our stand. (Applause.) I have heard, we have all heard, ever since the formation of this Anti-poverty society, that people in all parts of the United States are declaring themselves McGlynn Catholics. (Applause.) Well, I fancy that if they proceed with this matter of excommunication, they will discover very quickly and in a very disagreeable and unpleasant form that the McGlynn Catholic congregation will be the biggest congregation on this continent.” (Great applause.)

Mr. Clarke then announced John McMackin, chairman of the county committee of the united labor party, who said:

“We are approaching the anniversary of American independence. Our united labor party intends to celebrate it, to show that in struggling to lift humanity out of the depths of poverty we are the best friends of those stars and stripes that ought to float over a free and good, a generous people. (Applause.) Might I not say that it is well, too, that those people across the water who have fixed that day for the consummation of an outrage should be told to-morrow in plain language, in unmistakable tones, that while we are true to this flag, while we are law-abiding citizens, we are determined that no power, no matter from whence it comes, shall circumscribe the rights of a Catholic citizen in America. (Great applause.)

“We have got through boasting. It is a question of fight to-day. (Applause.) It is a question in our country to-day not only of citizenship, but whether the same outrageous, tyrannous, unjustifiable conduct that has characterized the church in Europe shall be allowed in America to bring the Catholic church into that disreputable state that makes its followers the mere tools of corrupt men.

“They may say that we in New York are forgetting the church, are forgetting catholicity. Let no man or woman be mistaken. We say that we believe that Christ came upon earth to save men; but that does not make it necessary that we should become stones to crush our fellow men. (Applause.) And when, my friends, our churches and our bishops can divest themselves of this idea, it will be a great deal better for Christianity.

“But let me tell them something further. Outside of this religious fight, with which I have nothing to do, but in the political fight, I can tell Corrigan—(hisses and groans)—I can tell the man who made Corrigan bishop, that there is a power in New York city that will vindicate the priest, Edward McGlynn. (Great applause. A voice: ‘Give it to them, John.’) Let them wait till November. My advice is something like Cromwell’s—‘Keep your powder dry.’ There is a lesson to be taught, and it will be taught. It will be the greatest lesson perhaps the Catholic church ever got, and that is to know that it is not necessary to be a good Catholic to wear a Roman collar. There is a good deal of meaning in that. The Catholic church to-day throughout the United States stands under better conditions than it does in any other country in the world. And why? Simply because the church is free from corrupt alliances with men who seek to control the government. (Applause.)

“And so it will be with this fight of Edward p. 2, col. 4 McGlynn. (Applause.) It looks a small matter to some men to-day, but it is the beginning of a new era in the Catholic church throughout the whole world. If ever a man tried to preach Christ’s gospel on earth to mankind, that man is Edward McGlynn. (Applause.)

“As Dr. McGlynn said, when these meetings opened at Chickering hall, we are not starting a new church, we are not opening a new gospel shop, but we are trying to bring men back to that love of God that makes man love his fellow men. (Applause.) Men of all creeds—the heathen Chinese even—can meet upon this platform of ours and applaud God’s name.

“If I thought that at this stage it were necessary to say anything as to what is likely to occur, I should say it very plainly, very distinctly. But I think we need do no more than to say in plain, simple English that we are determined that as Americans we shall exercise our rights without interference. (Applause.) And if at this moment there is in that marble palace an order for the excommunication of Dr. McGlynn, suffice it to state that there never was an order issued from the Roman propaganda that could fall with less effect than will that intended for Edward McGlynn. (Applause.) It is the most peculiar thing in the world. Corrigan said, when he suspended McGlynn, to a friend, a good friend of ours, ‘You won’t hear tell of him three days after I suspend him.’ (Hisses and groans.) They did suspend him, and they did hear tell of him. (A voice: ‘And they will hear tell of him!’) Aye, and other people are hearing tell of him! He is doing a great work. Our friend, the archbishop (hisses), said the other day that the minute he exercised his power of bell, book and candle, that would be the last of Edward McGlynn. A very good friend of ours said, ‘Don’t you think you are bringing the whole church into disgrace? You told me when you suspended him that we would not hear of him three days after.’ ‘Well,’ he said, ‘these labor men made such a racket.’ ‘Suppose you excommunicate him, what will the labor men do then? It will drive away the whole lot of them; Central labor union and district 49, and all the rest.’ (Applause.) The fact of it is they have played the last card in the pack. (Great applause and laughter. A voice: ‘McGlynn holds the joker!’) You may rest assured that they have no more power to excommunicate McGlynn than they have to fire me off this platform Let me sic the Catholics of New York once for all, as Dr. Burtsell (great applause, long continued) put it, they haven’t the power to excommunicate Edward McGlynn.

“Looking at the subject calmly and dispassionately, I say that if this struggle is to end in the triumph of the ecclesiastical machinery, then this American republic is not worth the struggle it cost to establish it. If men who take the oath of allegiance to this government, and young men born here are compelled to vote as an archbishop may dictate, then I say this American republic has very little to stand upon. And, indeed, it were well that thinking men, the men who have the interests of the Catholic church at heart, should stop and consider the disgrace that threatens the Catholic population of the United States.

“This movement of ours is a menace to the corrupt power that has attained to authority both in church and in state. There is something unnatural in this struggle for existence that compels one to starve his fellow man in order that he may obtain an advantage. If this is the lot of men, then indeed might we blaspheme that God who made it possible for me or for you to take advantage of our fellow men. But such is not our view of life. We believe that all these sic that exist to-day are the result of the unjust measures used by men themselves, and that even the church itself has winked at—at this crime of poverty. Any man, I care not whether he be priest, bishop or mayor, that will say to me that this is the natural condition of God’s children, I say he lies most damnably. (Applause.) There is, my friends, a condition of life to be obtained from just laws, not for the lazy, not for the indolent, but for those who desire to honestly toil. There should be a living for them, which there is not to-day. But while Mr. Hewitt establishes his one man anti-poverty society, let us go on with this crusade, take up the cross, carry it because it is the cross of Christ, carry it as men and women. As I told you before, the greatest salvation of the human family, the greatest vindication of Edward McGlynn will be to add to the vote of the united labor party next November. sic.)

A Knife Grinder’s Story.

Copy linkEdit

REYNOLDS BRIDGE, Conn.—As a simple grinder in the pocketknife trade I came to this country in 1848 from Sheffield, England. The trade was then in its infancy. I could always see that the cause of the material prosperity in this country was the abundance of good 29 which could be easily and cheaply had by any who wanted it. At that time we had in our trade the “Sheffield statement price.” We could get in wages from $4 to $5 a day and we paid $1.50 a week for board at factory boarding houses. Now this abundance of free land is gone and we have the land speculator and the tramp. And wages have dropped. I thoroughly believe in the doctrine that you advocate. All that men want is the raw material to work up into products. With equal opportunities to obtain this raw material each might take off his coat and go to work with a fair field and no 26?27?28?30?31?32?33?34?35?36?37?38?39?40?41?

JOHN CARREER.

The People Are Thinking.

Copy linkEdit

BROOKLYN, Md., June 27.—I do not see how any intelligent persons can fail to comprehend the doctrine of the land for the people after the clear and explicit definitions given by you to the queries of the students of the 42 college. The benefits derivable from such a system of taxation are as clear as the noonday sun.

THE STANDARD is doing noble work in educating the toiling masses, as is evident from the numerous Henry George and anti-poverty clubs that are being formed throughout the country. This shows beyond a doubt that the people only want instruction in the proper means to be adopted to relieve them of the heavy burden under which they are struggling.

EDWARD MCGARRITY.

A Brother in the North.

Copy linkEdit

PARKHILLY, sic., July 2.—I heard your lecture on “Land and Labor,” given in Toronto some few months ago. Since then I have read your great work, “Progress and Poverty.” I am thoroughly convinced of the correctness of your theory. It appeals so to common sense that I cannot see how any reasonable person can deny its truth. The magnitude of the projected reform is startling, but that such a reform is necessary no one who has enough intelligence to determine the sum of two and two can doubt. I am quite willing and anxious to do anything I can for the furtherance of this great cause, though my sphere be humble.

VICTOR MCGUFFIN.

Rev. J. B. Barnhill on the Cross of the New Crusade.

Copy linkEdit

During the next three months Rev. John B. Barnhill of Xenia, Ill., will be open to engagements to deliver his lecture on “The Cross of the New Crusade” to audiences in his own and adjacent states.

p. 2, col. 5

THE APPEAL TO ROME.

A Priestly Correspondent Gives Some Important Points in Canon Law.

A Catholic priest in Pennsylvania sends the following statement of the canon law with regard to appeals to the high ecclesiastical court of Rome, showing how helpless are the rank and file of the clergy in the hands of their superiors:

“THE STANDARD’S most intelligent and manly discussion of the case of the Rev. Dr. McGlynn has, I hope, led many Catholics to perceive that there are important defects in the exercising of the authority of their church. It is now manifest to all the world by the prominence of this case that a man may be condemned and visited with severest penalties in the American hierarchy, without a hearing or any opportunity of defense; but it is a further fact, not as well known, that when a man is so condemned, he can hardly ever obtain any adequate redress for the injury done to him. This will surprise the average Catholic, who is ready on all occasions with the advice to appeal to Rome. For the feeling has been almost universal among us that for every wrong and grievance a journey to Rome would produce an unfailing remedy.

“The people generally do not comprehend the idea that an appeal proper within the church cannot be taken except from a judicial sentence and that there can be no appeal where there has been no trial and consequently no record on which to ground an appeal.

“The Catholic mind is, naturally enough, misled by the confusion of two things which are widely different. The canon system of the church admits what is termed a”recourse” to Rome in all cases where the proceedings below have been extrajudicial or irregular, and it is this recourse which the Catholic press and people so often misapprehend for an appeal. The essential difference is that when a priest is compelled to take the method of a recourse instead of a regular appeal he is heard at the Roman tribunal by petition as of grace and informally without argument; whereas, if the processes of the canon law had been observed below, in the ecclesiastical court of the diocese or archdiocese, the priest could then take a record of the evidence and transactions and be entitled to present the same at Rome as of right and to offer argument touching all the questions involved and to get an adjudication of the main issue in the accustomed form of a decision by review. In short an appeal is had of right from judicial pronouncements; a recourse is had of grace from arbitrary acts.

“Obviously a recourse is a very imperfect method of procuring justice. In the canon system of the church it is regarded as an exception; but under our American regime a recourse has of necessity become the rule, because here the bishops rarely afford a hearing on trial, but usually inflict summary and arbitrary punishment. The appeal proper is thus destroyed at the root, and a suspended or deposed priest has no alternative but the recourse—within the lines of the church.

“What benefit, however, this recourse might ordinarily supply, its value was much impaired in the case of Father McGlynn, for the reason that the sic court of propaganda seemed committed in advance by the action of the cardinal president, who unfortunately allowed himself to be moved in the matter by an ex 43 correspondence.

“But the worst of the business is that no provision is made in behalf of the parochial clergy for carrying a recourse into effect. There is no sic fund to be drawn upon, no plan of assessment or contribution. And thus we have in the great Roman church, notwithstanding the boasted perfection of its discipline, what in a civil government would be deemed an anomaly of juridical practice—namely, a law without any provision for its enforcement. In a state we would attribute such defect to incompetence or corruption on the part of the legislature. In the church it may be fairly ascribed to neglect or oversight on the part of the Roman administration. Assuredly the recourse to Rome, in nine cases out of ten, remains a mere abstraction, if not a mere mockery, for want of ways and means to carry it on. Witness the more than a thousand priests—called in classic language 44 vagabundi—who are wandering about in America, deprived of honors and even of their livelihood. These men were thrown on the street by the arbitrary acts of bishops—that is, without a hearing or trial. Of what use to them is this recourse to Rome? It is, as an eminent writer has said in reference to another subject, it is like throwing a man overboard in mid-ocean and telling him he is at liberty to swim ashore. And the reflection is sad, indeed, that the more unselfish and faithful the priest the worse he finds his condition when placed under ban and censure. If he has served God and hated Mammon; if he has not hoarded the filthy lucre, but has kindly shared his possessions with the fatherless and the afflicted, he is for that the worse off when difficulties and misfortunes are put upon him. This result is teaching a terrible lesson to the priesthood—the lesson, namely, to be wise in their generation, like the unjust steward, and not to trust in the equities of their sacred profession.

“But if the canons of the church were enjoined by the propaganda on the American episcopate, then it would follow that men could not be deprived of their vocation and professional support by arbitrary acts of other men. On the contrary, even if a regular decision was rendered against a priest after a fair trial before his peers, he would still be entitled to sufficient income from his parish to enable him to prosecute an appeal at the court of Rome.

“The right to a trial before punishment; the right to a proportion of the parochial revenues—pending an appeal, and the election of their own bishop by the priests of the several dioceses—these, among other things, are the rights ordained in the council of Trent and other ecumenical councils for the protection of the priesthood.

“Alas! the priests of America, despite our frequent protests and exertions, have hitherto failed of securing at Rome any respectable recognition of their parochial privileges. It is, therefore, high time the laity should co-operate with them and unite throughout the country in demanding a full measure of justice for their devoted clergy.”

—— ——.

It Was a Lazy Man’s Paradise, But That Time Has Gone.

Exchange.

The profit in San Diego ranches and government lands have so far been made by the owners, not from their products, but from the extraordinary rise in value of their lands. Any one in fair health and out of debt must have a poor excuse if unable to make a living easily on a government claim under such simple sic as above. The average settler in Mr. Wade’s section has not only made a living, but the land, which cost him nothing, or next to nothing, has a fixed value, which is a large profit on a few years’ holding. Two claims entered by ex-soldiers a few years ago, on which the value of improvements have been but a few hundred dollars, were sold just before Mr. Wade came east, one for $3,100, the other for $5,000. In each case nearly every dollar is clear profit, the reward of going out a few miles from the city and living on a claim for three or four years. Other claims on which more time and money for fruit have p. 2, col. 6 been expended have sold for $12,000 to $16,000. Still other ranches, and by far the greater number, are being held and further improved by the men who are homesteaders or pre-empted them. These last will probably do better than those who sold and realized their average of $5,000 profit.

The unoccupied government land has about all been taken up, so that the experiment cannot be repeated, and no one needs to start for southern California expecting to find a lazy man’s paradise, with land for the taking, as he could have done a few years ago.

Now Figure Out the Profit on That Purchase, and Remember that Somebody Has Made It All.

sic.

Only seventy years ago a large portion of the territory comprising the state of Wisconsin, with a section of Minnesota, was sold for $100,000, and the deed is recorded in the New York register’s office. The sale was made by Samuel Peters to a syndicate, for there were syndicates in those days as well as in this. The sale was made in January, 1817, and the syndicate was composed of Lewis Ayres and ninety-nine others. It is described as a large tract of land in the northwestern territory, containing 8,000,000 acres and more. It comprised the greater portion of the land sold in 1727 to Jonathan sic by the Nandawassies tribe of Indians. Carver received 160,000 acres. The description is as follows:

Running from the falls of St. Anthony from the east bank of the Mississippi nearly east as far as the south end of Lake Pepin, where the Chippewa river joins the Mississippi; and from thence eastward five days’ travel, accounting twenty English miles a day; and from thence north six days’ travel, at twenty English miles per day; and from thence again to the falls of St. Anthony. There is reserved to the Indians the sole right to fish and hunt on unimproved land.

There is a population of 1,315,497 in Wisconsin at this date, and the value of the farm products is $727,779,496.

No Public Land to Be Had.

Springfield, Mass., Republican.

All of the land grant railroads of the country have returned answers to Secretary Lamar’s order, requiring them to show cause why the several orders of withdrawal from settlement of the lands within their indemnity limit should not be revoked and the lands thrown open to settlement. With but few exceptions the roads simply state that if they had their due they would receive more land than they now have, as much of the land granted them has been pre-empted, and there is no land from which to make selections. The St. Paul and Sioux City railroad company take the ground that this matter is beyond the jurisdiction of the secretary of the interior. The St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba road states that it now has a case pending in the supreme court of the United States which will, when decided, determine the status of that road before the law in regard to its land grant. The Atlantic and Pacific railroad state that they have earned 1,000,000 acres more land than they have received.

There is a Better Blessing Than That in Store for Them.

San Francisco Argonaut.

This (the Colorado desert) is a marvelous and wonderful land, and nothing caused the sic surprise than the soil and water discoveries constantly being made in these desert places. Places that are very inaccessible, that lie embedded in mountain canons and away from civilization, are becoming the luxurious homes of industrious and enterprising people who have the nerve to go somewhat beyond the confines and boundaries of present ’genteel” sic. What a God’s blessing it would be to the members of Henry George’s anti-poverty party if some kind, powerful genie would clothe them all in shirt and breeches, and then lift them up by the slack of their unmentionable garment out of city slums, tenement houses, politics, gin, idleness and crime, into these mountain and desert homes where poverty is only known and destitution only felt by those who are unable or unwilling to toil.

Emigration from Italy.

Philadelphia Telegram.

Italian emigration, especially from the old Neapolitan provinces, in 1883 had risen to 169,000, and it is rising by 10,000 or 15,000 a year. Of this outpouring more than half reaches South America, where it is believed more than [70,000?] Italians are now settled in the valley of the Platte alone, toward whose schools sic government, with a wise foresight, contributes £50,000 a year. Sir Horace Rumbold, in his work on the Silver river, just published, describes Buenos Ayres as filled with Italians, who, though perfectly orderly and peaceable, every now and then manifest in some gathering or festival their overwhelming strength. It is by no means impossible that the states of the Platte may become, without violence, by the natural operation of emigration and a full birth rate, Italian colonies. Political power as yet, however, still remains in the hands of the Spaniards.

The Wisdom of Foresight.

New York Cor. Philadelphia Record.

A new railway station has just been built at Mott avenue, formerly a suburb of this city, but now within the corporation limits. This station was built at a cost of $70,000, and is the prettiest anywhere in this neighborhood, and its appearance has been the signal for sending up the price of real estate in its neighborhood. Every train that goes out of or comes into the Grand Central station is obliged to stop at Mott avenue, so inhabitants of that end of the town can go to and from their places of business as readily as though they lived on the line of the elevated road. Property up and around Mott avenue until within a few months ago could be bought at a very low figure and the man who bought then and sells now stands a fair chance of making a fortune; but the trouble with most people is that they don’t see these opportunities until after they are past. The wise man is the man of 45?

Alabama’s Great Opportunity.

Edward Q. Norton in Mobile Item.

If the people of Alabama to-day owned all the coal and iron lands in the state, and received but a fraction of the market price for the coal and iron mined, this alone would pay all state, county and city governmental expenses, and instead of all these great fortunes going, as they now do, into the pockets of a few individuals, this wealth would be, by this method of taxation, returned to the whole people. There are over 5,500 square mile of coal sic in this state, with thousands of square miles of iron and valuable 46?

The state expenditures in [1879?] were [$843,724?]; call them now in round figures 47 million and a half dollars, and a very small tax upon the rental value of the 21,000,000 acres of land in this state would pay all this and leave a margin for county, township, city and all other government expenditures, and relieve the people of every other form of taxation.

Must Sell or Die.

Toronto Labor Reformer.

Go on the market toward the close of market day and you will notice this, that such articles as remain unsold, and which, being comparatively imperishable, their owners can take home with them, fall but little in price; but the perishable articles must be sold or lost, and consequently toward the close of the day their price falls greatly. But of all perishable articles none are so perishable as labor. Under our social system it must sell or die. Every moment it remains unsold it suffers loss.

Listen to Whitelaw Reid.

New York Tribune Editorial.

Character is not bettered by mere expansion of rights. It requires discipline, self-denial, education in sobriety and thrift, to improve it. There is nothing in Mr. George’s land doctrine which touches any of these vital springs of action. He appeals to greed, not to the higher self. He seeks to build a party upon the general lust of 48?

Page 3 of 8contents

THE STANDARD, SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887. 3

p. 3, col. 1

QUERIES AND ANSWERS.

A Threadbare Question.

Please answer the following question: A has improvements worth $100,000, on which he receives income of ten per cent, or $10,000 per annum. B has improvements worth $10,000, but which are old, and on which he receives seven per cent, or $700 per year. C owns lot free and has a small home on same in which he lives and where he stables the one horse with which he gets a living for his family. (1) On what principle of justice can each of these men be called upon to pay the same taxes on each of these lots? (2) Would not taxing land in this way wipe out the poor man and make the rich man richer? G.

  1. In the case you suppose, neither A, B sic C would pay any taxes. As the lots adjoined each other, they would be of the same, or nearly the same, value, and as C’s lot is supposed to be free, the others would also be free, or so nearly free that the difference would not be worth computing.

But to bring out the point that troubles you, let us suppose that C’s lot is a valuable one, in which case he would have to pay as high a tax as A and B. The principle of justice in such case is that each monopolizes the same natural and social opportunity. Under existing conditions if D owned all three lots, he would not charge any less ground rent to C, because he had a shanty on his lot than to A, who had a hundred thousand dollar building on his. If common ownership were recognized by the land value tax, it would be an injustice to every other member of the community to allow C to waste his opportunities without paying their value into the common fund.

If A could make a profit out of a hundred thousand dollar building on one of these lots a profit could be made out of such a building on each of the other lots, and it would be to the best interest of the whole community to force the occupiers of the second and third lots to make as good use of them as was made of the first. In the case you suppose B and C would be mere speculators in land values, keeping land out of its best use for some selfish end. If they could not afford to put their land to as good use as A put his to there would be plenty of land in the neighborhood to which they could resort for little or no tax and where their inferior improvements would be appropriate.

  1. No. What now makes the rich man richer and wipes out the poor man is the system of taxation which permits the appropriation of land without using it, or what in principle is the same thing, without putting it to its best use. Taxing improvements does not hurt the rich man, for of such taxes he pays but a small proportion. Taxes on products are paid by the consumer. If your example were reversed and taxes were laid wholly on the improvements the result would be somewhat like this: A would pay no tax at all; he would make his tenants pay it in higher house rent. B would pay no tax; he also would make his tenants pay. But C would pay taxes, because he would himself be the consumer of his home and stable on which the taxes would be laid. But if land were taxed exclusively C would pay no taxes if he chose to put his home and stable on a free lot, while A and B would have to pay a tax equal to the rental value of their lots.

Your questions are rather threadbare. They have been answered over and over again, and it would be well for you to consult the back numbers of THE STANDARD if your mind is not yet clear on the subject.

If.

WASHINGTON, D. C., June 19.—I own eighteen acres of land, the rental value of which is $8 per acre. My taxes under the present system are $21 per year. What taxes would I have to pay under your system, to retain the occupancy and use of the land? Would I have to pay $8 per acre, supposing the rental value did not change, if your theory is fully carried out, thus making my outlay $144 per year, instead of $21? GEORGE LAWRENCE.

If you do not include rent of improvements, and if the rental value of your land did not change, your taxes would be $8 per acre. If the skies fell you might catch larks.

Twenty-Fifth of Henry VIII.

JERSEY CITY.—In your STANDARD of June 18 your correspondent, C. N. Matson, refers to the law thirteenth of twenty-fifth of Henry VIII. Has that law ever been repealed? If not, is not that statute in force now even in the United States? As I understand, the colonists brought the laws of England in force at the time they left with them, and unless repealed since the declaration of independence by the various states, must still be effective, though not acted on. Can you or any of your friends tell if it still lives and can be acted on? POYNTZ FOX.

The law to which you refer has no force in this country. The colonists did bring with them all the laws of the mother country that were appropriate to their new situation. Whether this law was in force in England then we do not know, but even if it was its force as law has been spent here by nearly three centuries of inconsistent practice.

Wealth Concentration.

NEW YORK.—(1) I am told that it would ruin a man to pay taxes on unimproved land at the present rate of taxation. This means that your theory is in actual practice. As I know it is not so, please give me the figures.

  1. I am told that a man who possesses land valued at $10,000, or unimproved land to that value, with no other means to make improvements, would be ruined by the improvements of wealthier neighbors, who, by improving their property to $50,000, would cause the value of the unimproved land to rise. That is, that your theory would concentrate wealth and sweep away the middle classes.

  2. Is “Progress and Poverty” translated into French?

(4) Can I get the German edition in New York?
FRENCHMAN.
  1. If present taxes would ruin the owners of unimproved land, those owners must evade the taxes, for very few ruins of that kind are visible. Our theory is not in practice so long as taxes are imposed on labor products. It is of the essence of the theory that labor products shall not be taxed. Your informants mean that if unimproved land were taxed even at present taxing rates to its full value as the law requires, its owners would have to use it or let it go. This, in many cases, would be true; and that it is not so taxed is because it is to the interest of the rich to keep taxes

p. 3, col. 2 on land as low as possible, while the rest of the community are not conscious of any interest in the matter. Other taxes are shifted to the consumer, but land taxes cannot be. When the theory we advocate is enforced it will be to the obvious interest of everybody to see to it that one piece of land pays, irrespective of improvements, as high a tax as another of the same value; and then land cannot be kept out of use without yielding as much to the community as it would if used, while every one will be encouraged to invest his money in production which will be exempt from taxation.

  1. An expensive building does not of itself increase the value of the lot on which it stands or lots adjoining. It is not improvements that increase values, but population. An expensive building on one lot may induce some one to erect another expensive building on an adjoining lot, and thus increase values; but it is the demand for more land, not the expensive building, that is the real cause of the increased value. If values were increased in this or any other way, it would be a good thing for the community at large, and a good thing also for the poor man who, because he was worth only $10,000, had to move. If his lot were unimproved, and he would not or could not improve it, he ought to move and give a better man a chance to utilize the opportunity he was wasting; and if some of his wealth was in improvements, he would, in most cases, lose none of that. This would not concentrate wealth. The appropriation to public use of land values, and the opening to use, free, of all land having no value would put an effectual check upon that. It is amusing to notice the anxiety of wealth concentrators lest something may be done tending to concentrate wealth. When labor and capital are free, wealth cannot be concentrated; it is only when they can be exploited under conditions that make the laborer dependent and small capital a drug, that wealth can be concentrated. If the theory we advocate would tend to concentrate wealth, it would not be honored with the enemies it has.

  2. Yes.

  3. Send to THE STANDARD.

Co-Operation.

LOUISVILLE, KY.—Is it right to sell land by a co-operative mining and manufacturing company and give clear titles or checks for the same, so the individuals can again sell said land to the highest bidder that may come along, and speculate in that manner, and in time would it not drive co-operation to the wall and leave us again in as oppressed condition as at present? WILLIAM H. SMITH.

As long as private ownership in land is recognized by law, there is no reason why it should not be done. We are not called upon to put square pegs into round holes. It can serve no good purpose for individuals to act respecting land ownership differently from prevailing customs.

As to co-operation, there can be no real co-operation so long as land is private property. The very first step in the direction of co-operation must be the freeing of the land. To undertake co-operative enterprises, while our present land system prevails, is to begin the building of a house by laying the shingles, and shingles will not stay in place on the roof of a house that hasn’t been built.

“Made” Land.

GLEN COVE.—Opposite my shop is or has been a swamp one-half acre square, bordered by a creek on two sides, and by buildings on the other. It was overflooded by the tide and became a source of malaria when the tide was out. It had only a nominal value. The owner of said swamp built a dock on the water side and filled gradually the swamp with ashes, etc. The tide does not reach it any more. The fifteen feet deep surface is due to improvement—i. e., is owned by the landlord, and the whole present value is due to the improvement. How do you propose to base the taxes on this half acre, as there is no similar land surrounding it? And does that landlord not actually own that fifteen feet deep surface? WM. E. FELLENDORF.

This is a case of “made ground.” So long as the whole value was due to the filling in we would not tax the owner at all. But when the location sic a value, we would base taxes on that. This kind of improvement, however, is permanent. Once made, it is made forever. It requires no labor to keep it in repair, as houses do. It is as a labor product analogous to a new invention, and we should no more think of giving its producer and his successors perpetual ownership than of giving a perpetual patent for an invention. In time its value will merge into the value of the location, and be entitled to no consideration in adjusting the land value tax. It is not necessary, desirable or just to exempt it from taxation longer than is requisite to induce labor to reclaim other waste places.

Money.

ST. LOUIS, MO.—(1) Does the increase of money increase the price of things?

  1. How?

  2. Ought there to be any more paper money than truly represents coin held in reserve?

  3. If there is more paper money than this for circulation will not the result be an opportunity to “corner,” “gobble,” etc., even with “the land theory” in successful operation?

  4. Is not all paper money beyond representation of coin fictitious in value?

(6) And is not that as bad as fictitious values of land?
H. S. CHASE.

  1. That is its tendency if the volume of production and rapidity of exchange remain the same.

  2. By augmenting the supply of media of exchange relatively to demand.

  3. Why not? Coin held in reserve is capital tied up. Its functions as coin are as well performed by paper, and its functions as a useful product of labor are paralyzed. There is no justification of any coin reserve.

  4. No.

  5. No, unless to be a representative of values is to be fictitious in value. Money as such has no value in the sense that a house or land has value. A new house adds to the values of the community, but an additional issue of money does not. The community is no richer when eighty cents of silver comes out of the mint stamped with the dollar mark than when the silver went to the mint, but a representative of values to the extent of twenty cents has been created.

  6. Fictitious land values are bad because they operate as barriers between

p. 3, col. 3
labor and land. What you call fictitious money values has no such effect.

He Dies Young.

HARRISBURG, PA.—Mr. George’s plan for asserting and securing equal rights to land is to abolish all taxation except that upon land values. He would not abolish private titles; he would allow those now in possession to “continue to call it their land;” to buy and sell, convey and devise it. Now would not this enable the holders of land to exact in the form sicsic rent all the tax levied upon the land? What could prevent it? Would not the burden fall on the tenant at last for the same reason that a tax on a commodity is paid by the persons consuming the commodity? E. W. J.

The margin of production determines rent. When that is low rent is high; when that is high rent is low. And the margin of production is fixed by demand for land relatively to the supply. The demand for land is in the order of its productiveness. When the most productive is appropriated, whether it be used or not, additional demand must be met from the supply of the next productive, and then from the next, and so on; and as people are forced upon lower grades the higher grades rise in value. The value is speculative or real, according as it is based on the current rent the land will command, or the rent it is expected to command in the future. In fact, all land values are to some extent speculative. No land will yield rent equal to current rates of interest on its selling value. This speculative value would be destroyed by a high land value tax, because it would not pay to keep any valuable land out of use, or out of its best use, and there would be such a market supply of land of all grades that values would fall. The margin of production would rise. As Mr. 49 says: “A tax on rent falls wholly on the landlord. There are no means by which he can shift the burden upon any one else. It does not affect the value or price of agricultural produce, for this is determined by the cost of production in the most unfavorable circumstances, and in those circumstances, as we have so often demonstrated, no rent is paid. A tax on rent, therefore, has no effect other than its obvious one. It merely takes so much from the landlord and transfers it to the state.”

When a tax is imposed on a product of labor, it tends to diminish the supply and thus to increase the price; but a tax on land values tends to increase the market supply of land by forcing the use or sale of idle land, and thus to decrease the price.

Of one thing you may be sure, that what landlords do not do in the way of raising rent when there is no tax, they cannot do when there is a tax. The landlord who can increase rent, and yet restrains himself until taxes are put on his land, always dies young.

A Case of Hardship.

CHICAGO.—Among the host of questions suggested by a careful examination of the principles enunciated in “Progress and Poverty,” one occurs to me which I have not yet seen answered fully. It is this:

Supposing that a man has bought a home for himself and beautified the grounds, etc., and in the course of years the growth of the city is such that what was once a residence district becomes a rushing business center. Now for two reasons the man who owns the homestead is in a bad position: First, the location has already become undesirable for a home; second, if he endeavors to sell, he finds that his house is useless for business purposes. He cannot afford to stay, because the full tax would be altogether too much for him to pay for a home, and he could not sell the only thing he owned—the house and improvements—because they would be useless to the only parties who would be likely to purchase, i. e., business men for business purposes. What remedy would he have? Of course I am now talking about his own property, the home, not the property of the community, which would be the increased value of the land itself. C. W. PHILLIPS.

In the case you suppose, the occupier would be in precisely the same position that he would be in under the present condition, with this difference, that whereas now he would receive from the community enough to pay for his house and leave a large profit besides, he would then receive nothing from the community. In other words, so much of the present system as would give him a pension would be abolished. If there were individual cases of hardship the community might, if it chose, give the sufferer another house. It would be cheaper to do that than to give him what it gives now, namely, the privilege of levying a perpetual and indefinite tax upon his fellow men.

Such cases, however, would seldom arise. A man who had occupied a beautiful home throughout “a course of years,” in which the growth of the city was “such that what was once a residence district becomes a rushing business center,” would find it profitable to convert his dwelling into a business building, or even to tear it down and erect a business building; and his means would enable him to do it. Or if he did not want to do that himself he would find plenty of people who would want to do it and who would buy him out at a price that would give to him the value of the dwelling as an inducement to let them erect a business building there instead of doing it himself. Moreover, in nearly all cases, by the time a residence district has become a rushing business center the house owner would have enjoyed in use the full average value of his improvements. Finally, let the apparent hardship be what it will, compare it with the hardships of our present system and say which of the two you, as a humane man, would choose.

The Best Way to Find Out.

WAKEFIELD, MASS.—Not understanding one of your answers you made to the 5051? students, and being interested in your theory on the land question, I would like to know what you meant by saying, “Under this system a man would own his home just as securely as he does now; the house would be his, the possession of the land would be his; he would still be its owner, subject to the condition of paying the tax, and could give it or sell it, just as he does now.” Do you mean to say he can sell the land that belongs to the government, or do you mean sell the right of it? By having possession of it at the time your theory commences, he would have the right to hold it. But supposing he wanted to leave town or country, and he was a poor man and owned a little home which he paid for, would it be right for him to lose it and

p. 3, col. 4
the government take it without making it good for him? I would like to understand those points.
HENRY DE KOCH.

If you would really like to understand these points, read chapters 1, 2 and 3 of book 7, and chapter 3 of book 9 of “Progress and Poverty.” It will do you no harm to read the book through.

Notes.

D. M. HUNTER, Alliance, O.—We believe that the government alone should issue money; but profits on the sic of money are not economic interest. Read chapters 3, 4 and 5 of book 3 of “Progress and 52?

J. H. MILLEUR of Philadelphia, Pa., should read “Progress and Poverty.” THE STANDARD’S query column may dissipate mists, but it cannot roll clouds away.

W. CURTIS TAYLOR, Ridley Park, Pa.—If you really think that the land of Pennsylvania is “only worth what it was worth when there was not an inhabitant on it, plus the value of the labor that has been put upon it,” put your proposition in the form of a question and we will answer it. And as your mind is fixed on Pennsylvania, you might, in framing your question, take into consideration the value of an acre of Pennsylvania land five minutes before and its value five minutes after a coal deposit is discovered under its surface sic might consider also the difference between the value of a city lot before population moves in its direction and after, no labor being done upon the lot meantime.

LEVI R. PIERCE, Lynn, Mass.—The answer to which you refer assumed a fixed volume of money. The question was really one of values rather than prices. You are right in supposing that a variable volume of money may affect prices.

Another New Name for the Party.

Copy linkEdit

COLUMBUS, O.—I suggest “Anti-confiscation” as a fitting name for a party advocating the reforms which we propose, and in support thereof offer the following reasons:

  1. We are opposed to all further confiscation by individuals or corporations of the indivisible unearned increment and common inheritance of all mankind—i. e., the rental value of land.

  2. We are opposed to the confiscation by taxation of any part of the product of true capital and labor.

  3. We are opposed to all further confiscation of the earnings of the many who toil for the benefit of the favored few who enjoy special privileges, such as railroad and telegraph monopolies.

In short, the mission of our party is the prevention of confiscation, and should the name anti-confiscation party be adopted, we will not only make known our purpose, but effectually spike the guns of our enemies, and, better still, capture their ammunition, which has so far consisted mostly in dubbing us confiscators.

With an anti-poverty society and an anti-confiscation party, we can sweep the social and political platter clean. CHARLES F. KIPP.

A Sample Case of Western “Progress.”

Copy linkEdit

ARKANSAS CITY, KAN.—I want to give you a few facts about this growing little town. Our location and situation fit us to be some time a great city, and sums of money ranging from $100,000 down have already been gained by the increase in value of land here. The ways taken to “boom” the city show the helplessness of the poor man and the power of the railroads and land owners.

One year ago a syndicate purchased large tracts of land here and then deeded half of it to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad on condition that they would “boom” the town by every means in their power. The syndicate also got, through the city government, a free gift to the railroad company of the gas, electric light and horse railroad franchises. The railroad company carried out their bargain, located division shops, round house, etc., here, and land has trebled in value since. The result is that a house costing $1,000 to build, if anywhere within easy walking distance of the business center, will rent for $25 a month. Thus we see the twin robbers, the railroad and land owner, conspiring to compel the would-be inhabitant to pay a blackmail price for the privilege of living and doing business here. W. H. CREAMER.

Farmers in the South.

Ralph Beaumont, general lecturer of the Knights of Labor, who has returned from a lecture tour through the southern states, says:

“I found the people through the south very eager to obtain knowledge upon the great economic questions that are agitating the people in this country. There is a stereotyped phrase ‘that you cannot get the farmers to fall in with the land doctrines advocated by Henry George.’ Well, people who make that statement have but a very faint knowledge of either the doctrine or of public opinion among the farmers upon that question. Let them go where I have been in the south for the past six weeks and it will not take them long to be convinced that the idea that the American farmer owns his farm is only a delusion. In the state of North Carolina four-fifths of the farms are owned by the farmers only in name. They possess a deed, but the real owner is the fellow that holds the other kind of a deed called a mortgage. And the only reason that the merchant does not take the farm and take a fee simple deed for it is that if he did so he would have to pay the taxes on the farm.”

A Man Who is Thinking.

ADAMS, MASS., June 27.—We have a plant in this town representing $350,000 on a piece of land of five acres. Why should that land be taxed more by many a thousand dollars than the five acres alongside of it owned by a man who makes no use of it, but is holding it simply for speculative purposes. Under a proper system both would be taxed alike, the benefits of the improvements going direct to the parties whose brains and muscle produced them.

I am a constant reader of your valuable paper and tracts and am a firm believer in sic your doctrine on the land question. As for Dr. McGlynn, God will bless him every day of his life. He is the David of the nineteenth century fighting the battles of the poor and oppressed. WORKER.

And That Is the Anti-Poverty Society We Are Re-establishing Now.

New York Observer.

We are firmly persuaded that there is no anti-poverty society in the world like that established in Galilee eighteen hundred years ago. In the acceptance of the doctrines taught by the founder of this institution, and in the faithful practice of them, we find the only rational hope of the deliverance of the world from the bondage of sin and all the woe and misery which sin entails.

Can’t a Young Man Look to the Rise of Land Values for Wealth?

Toronto, Can., Christian Guardian.

All theories which ignore the individuality and independence of men, or which teach our young people to look to anything but their own exertions for wealth, are broken reeds.

p. 3, col. 5

WHERE THE CHURCHES STAND.

Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost Speaks Frankly on the Subject—Missions Are Simply Church Poor Houses.

At the Belleville Avenue Congregational church, Newark, N. J., Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost lately delivered an interesting and impressive sermon on the text, “And the common people heard him gladly.” Mark xii, 53?

“If the common people,” said Mr. Pentecost, “the poor people, the people of no special social distinction, heard Christ gladly, it must have been because He said what they wished to hear in a manner which pleased them. Jesus was an unmistakable friend of the common people, and possessed the rare trait of speaking words of truth and righteousness in simple, direct language, and with unaffected earnestness. He was admirably fitted to preach the gospel to the poor, for while he possessed a divinely great soul, and saw the truth with divinely sharp intuitions, He was at the same time, as we are accustomed to say, ‘only a sic.’ Not merely the supposed son of a carpenter, but Himself a workman at the bench, He knew the hardship of poverty and the unjust social disadvantages of a poor man. He never was anything but a carpenter. He became a preacher, but He never entered the class of preachers; He never received a theological education or a salary. He was Jesus the carpenter, prophet, till the day of His death. He was in sympathy with common people, because He was one of the common people Himself. You must remember this, if you expect to understand Him. Jesus never associated with rich people, although He occasionally visited them. Nor with the priests and ministers of His day, who were His opponents and critics. They had no sympathy for the common people He loved. In fact, He was almost absolutely alone in His doctrine and the purpose which He intended to accomplish. He gathered a few earnest men as disciples, He founded no church, instituted no organization.

“It is a fair question now to ask whether the men who are preaching what is called the gospel of Christ, and who are supposed to be His ambassadors, bear resemblance to Him whom they call their Master or not in this particular, that they are men whom the common people hear gladly, and whether the church resembles Him. The Christian ministry, as a rule, are not men who are in any true sense of the word, poor or in sympathy with the common people.

“Most ministers have nothing but their salaries, and they are proverbially small, but they are not as poor as Jesus was. Many are sons of farmers and middle class men, but they are finely educated under influences that separate them in thought from the common people. When they get into the ministry they soon find that a successful pastorate means the preaching a sic that will not disturb the well-to-do.

“I do not say it is strange or unnatural that ministers are out of sympathy with common people. I merely report a fact which few would have the courage to deny. Take up the Monday papers, where you will find reports of sermons the day before in which were discussed themes of popular interest, and how seldom will you find that any minister has squarely taken the right side of any question if the ‘best people’ of the community are on the wrong side? Everyone knows that if a monopolist or money manipulator sits regularly in the pew the pulpit is silent on those subjects; or if it does speak it is not long before the minister ‘goes’ and the pious robber of the poor stays.

“Read the sermons printed in the Monday papers on the labor question and find me one, if you can, preached to a congregation in which are many employers, which does not pity and patronize the laborer, and tell him he ought to behave himself and submit to his superior. Or, if there is any recognition of the laborer’s wrongs, the blame is laid nowhere that the rich and ruling class is not willing to have it laid. Or, if a minister does happen to speak the truth upon any of these subjects, it is only a question of time when he has to go, for the church of to-day has no use for a man who preaches a gospel for the poor and to the poor, because the church is run in the interest of the rich, and not in the interest of the rich and poor alike.

“Not but that there are churches for the poor. There are mission churches, but missions, as I have often said before, are simply church poor houses, and are a disgrace to Christianity. No church ought to have a mission annex. If you don’t want the poor to come to church have the courage to say so, but for the sake of sincerity do not go through the hypocrisy of pretending to do a good thing by building a mission. You cannot deceive God by building a mission chapel. He knows that it is simply a salve to the conscience of an institution which does not want the unwashed within its doors. It is a wonder that He has sic with such loathsome hypocrisy so long.

“There are some churches whose members are poor, yet these churches are run in the interest of those among their number who contribute the most money (not in proportion to their means), and you will find them many times as happy when the rich Mr. This or the Hon. Mr. That comes in to their services than when some man comes in who is ’only a carpenter.” Just as soon as possible you will find that church leaving the locality where the poor reside and putting up a stone building with a mortgage on it in a better neighborhood.

“All that I have said of the lack of sympathy among ministers and in the church is just as true of the Roman Catholic as of the Protestant church. I speak of this because until lately it was believed, and sometimes flung in the face of Protestants, that the Roman Catholic church was the church of the poor. But recent events have shown that the Roman Catholic church has no more sympathy with poor people than we have. When the real 54 was applied she was found wanting. If you ask the Roman Catholic or Protestant church, ‘Shall the poor have charity?’ both will answer with pious zeal, ‘Yes.’ But if you ask either of them, ‘Shall the poor have their rights; shall the poor have justice; shall the poor have the gospel preached to them upon an equality with the rich?’ both churches have said and do say ‘No.’

“Many persons object to this severe arraignment of Christianity. They cannot disprove what I say. But they say it is very bad to admit such things and call attention to them even if true, but it seems to me eminently important that we should look the fact and its consequences in the face. The fact is undeniable. The consequence is that multitudes have given up the church, and because they identify Christianity and the church, they have given up Christianity too.

“To the rulers of Europe—the iron-handed Bismarck, the tyrannical czar, the queen of England, a nation that never did right until forced to, a woman who permits sick women and infirm men to be flung out of their homes in Ireland while she celebrates her jubilee—the rulers, most of whom are monsters of wickedness which only the patience of God can endure and His mercy forgive, are Christians, Heaven save the 55.

“Most of the men in this country who constitute the assemblies which make the laws that put power into the hands of a few to rob the many, and most of the men who heartlessly oppress the poor are Christians. And most of

p. 3, col. 6 the ministers and churches justify these wicked people in their wickedness. Is it any wonder that there are a few socialists and anarchists abroad who are also atheists? It is a wonder that there are no more. I foresee that unless the church of Christ becomes converted to the religion of Christ, the day is not far distant when some different form of Christianity will take the place of the present church—a form more nearly in accord with the truth as it came from the lips of Christ, and less given over to the world, the flesh and the devil.

“Nor need it be said that I find fault with what is, and yet offer nothing in its place, for I do offer something in its place—I offer the religion of Jesus Christ. My brethren, I do not wish to offend you, although I know I sometimes do. But I must speak to you the truth of God. Take these words of Christ and show me wherein I am wrong. Do not come to me with creeds and the decisions of popes and councils. Do these know what Christ’s religion was and is better than He knew Himself? I tell you this is the sign of it—that the common people hear it gladly, and when the ministry or the church look coldly on the common people, that is the sign of decay. I leave you to judge whether that decay has set in or not.”

Words of Wisdom.

New York Sun.

> It is true enough that the evils of poverty are felt most keenly by those who fear destitution and are struggling to make both ends meet. Such people are in continual dread of the coming of a day when they will fall over the edge so perilously near which they are living; and trouble and difficulty, as we all know, are worse in the anticipation than in the actual experience of them. > > Therefore it happens that a man with an income which a common laborer or even a mechanic would regard as opulence oftentimes feels poorer than either of them, and more anxious regarding his future. Any considerable reduction of his income means for him an entire change in his mode of life, and even in his social relations; for he has adopted a style of living which eats up every cent he can make. He has sacrificed his peace of mind by taking an unjustifiable risk in order to maintain what he regards as necessary respectability. > > Many salaried men are in that position, the associations they have chosen almost compelling them to indulge in extravagances, considering the insecurity of their incomes. They may carry an insurance on their lives for the benefit of their families, to whom they can leave nothing else, but even that may be lost in the day of disaster because of their inability to keep it up. The great mass of men who depend on salaries, clerks, for instance, are, of course, driven to the greatest economy of living, for their pay, on the average, does not equal that of a mechanic, and in very many cases is not more than that of a common laborer. They are worse off than the mechanic, too, because they do work of which the supply vastly exceeds the demand and have no expert ability which enables them to readily obtain a new job. When they have lost their places they are all at sea, not knowing where or when others may be found. Their labor, for which there is so uncertain a demand, is all the capital they have, and yet they have little or nothing of their gains, so that when they lose employment they are flat on their backs.

Isn’t This Sound Common Sense?

Burlington, sic , Justice.

> There are in Burlington some 25,000 lots averaging one-sixth of an 56? > > There are some 25,000 people living here and an unknown quantity cf dead men who own the land, or whose will is being executed by those who live here. > > The 25,000 living people pay some $700,000 a year to those dead men, through “their heirs or assigns forever,” for the privilege of living here, where most of them were born. They also pay fifty per cent or so over its value for everything they buy, from the cradle to the rough box on their coffin. > > The city gets a revenue of $70,000 to $80,000 annually from the tax-ridden people in the shape of poll tax, dray license, dog tax, scales, wharfage, police costs, fines and miscellaneous sic, but nothing from the sic. The temperance champions pick them enough, so the police are easy with them. > > Most of these taxes are burdensome, unjust and difficult and expensive to collect, and ought to sic. > > But there is hardly a lot in the city which might not yield $2 a year, and there are some that ought to yield $800; but at the average of $5 per lot the revenue would amount to $125,000 or thereabouts, and if there were no penalties for voting, driving a dray or building a house we could well afford to pay an average of $10 a year on each good-sized lot (60x120). This would bring into the treasury $250,000 annually, and very few lots would remain unused, only people who have use for them would pay the taxes on them, and they would be disposed of, as our present delinquent tax law disposes of our homes in October if we fail to pay all taxes, fines and costs in due time. > > Suppose one-half of the $250,000, $125,000, goes for state, school, road and other purposes, and the other half into the city treasury, together with about $8,000 from miscellaneous sources, we would have a nice little revenue of $133,000 and business booming all the time, for so many homes would be made here, and so many people employed, there would be a constant demand for all sorts of commodities.

The Way Protection Works.

Philadelphia Record.

> When the high mark in the prices of iron was reached, and foreign importations were freely made, American operatives demanded a small share of the profits of the rise. Their demand was refused except in a few instances, and then it was that the “labor troubles” began. When the coke syndicate saw how large a profit the iron and steel manufacturers were realizing they made an advance of twenty-five per cent on their tariff-protected product, which the manufacturers could very readily pay out of their increased earnings. The miners and coke workers then asked for an advance in the rates of wages that would not have amounted to ten cents of the advance of forty cents in the price of a ton of coke. The iron manufacturers and the coke syndicate, however, were determined to put all the profits in their own 57 pockets, while treating workingmen to newspaper articles and tracts of the tariff league on the blessings of protection to American industry.

The “Star” Is Impressed, in Spite of Its Pro-Poverty Principles.

Reviewing the contents of the Forum for July, the New York Star remarks:

The article of all others, however, which produces the profoundest impression, by reason of the appalling statements which it contains, is one sic “Tenement House 58,” by Father J. O. S. Huntington. Public attention cannot be too often called to the frightful conditions among us resulting from an overcrowding in our poorer districts that seems hardly possible to credit, and leading to a state of morality or rather immorality that no pen can picture, although Father Huntington stirs up his readers on the subject in a way that leaves further indifference an impossibility. Imagine, for instance, what must result from having [2,076?] souls crowded into and living in a space covered by 700 by 200 feet, and divided into [1,736?] rooms.

Why Employers Combine.

Real Estate Record and Guide.

> In prosperous times the unions have a fair chance of getting the better of their employers when the latter act singly, but when the bosses come together they have many advantages over their workingmen. The great trouble is that the employers are often rivals in business, and it goes against the grain for them to co-operate with other employers; yet they are learning the lesson that organization must be beaten by organization if the two parties are to contend on equal terms.

Page 4 of 8contents

4 THE STANDARD, SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887.

p. 4, col. 1

THE STANDARD.

Copy linkEdit

HENRY GEORGE, Editor and Proprietor.

Published weekly at

[25?] ANN STREET, NEW YORK.

TERMS, POSTAGE FREE.

One year, $2.50; six months, $1.25; single copies, 5 cents.

Entered at the postoffice, New York, as second class matter.

Communications and contributions are invited, and will be attentively considered. Manuscripts not found suitable for publication will be returned if sufficient stamps are sent for return postage. No notice will be taken of anonymous communications.

Contributions and letters on editorial matters should be addressed to THE EDITOR OF THE STANDARD, and all communications on business to the PUBLISHER OF THE STANDARD.

THE STANDARD wants an agent to secure subscribers at every post office in the United States, to whom liberal terms will be given.

THE STANDARD is for sale by newsdealers throughout the United States. Persons who may be unable to obtain it will confer a favor on the publisher by notifying him promptly.

Sample copies sent free on application.

SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887.

THE STANDARD is forwarded to subscribers by the early morning mails each Friday. Subscribers who do not receive the paper promptly will confer a favor by communicating with the publisher.

JACOB SHARP.

Copy linkEdit

59? Sharp has been convicted, and unquestionably justly convicted. And yet it is impossible to resist a feeling of something like sympathy for him, since the crime for which he must now go to the state prison is simply what in hundreds of cases brings wealth, ease and honor.

Jacob Sharp is in truth more a victim than a criminal—a victim of that rotten condition of society which the anti-poverty movement seeks to abolish—a victim of that greed of gain born of the fear of want, which sanctifies the getting of wealth by any means, provided the successful man can only keep out of the penitentiary. That he will not be able to keep out of the penitentiary is owing to what doubtless seems to him like a series of accidents, and not that he is in reality a sinner above other men who are to-day accounted our “first citizens.”

Jacob Sharp was an enterprising man who had set his heart on making a public improvement in which he saw an advantage to the public and fortune to himself. Thanks to that corrupt political system so dear to the hearts of our respectable “saviors of 60,” neither he nor any one else could obtain a franchise for a Broadway railroad without bribing a majority of the board of aldermen. Jacob Sharp bribed them. In this he doubtless knew that he was doing something morally wrong; but it was a moral wrong acquiesced in, if not justified, by the code of the society in which he moved. He “took the world as he found it,” as “practical men” do, and had he refused to take the opportunity that was offered him, on the ground that it was wicked to bribe aldermen, he would have been laughed at as a 61” by his associates and backers, and might at once have abandoned any idea of ever being trusted by moneyed men as the promoter and manager of a great financial enterprise.

Jacob Sharp doubtless felt that what he was doing was wrong if judged by a strict code of morality; but it was just such a wrong as the rich men of New York do every day without any one seeming to think any the worse of them; just such a thing as he himself had done before without losing one scintilla of the respect of those for whose respect he cared. Jacob Sharp’s view of the case was doubtless that which attains in railroad sic and bank parlors and among the respectable congregations of pro-poverty churches—that the crime attaches to the bribed rather than to the briber. He may have looked upon the aldermen who took his thousand dollar bills as a set of corrupt scoundrels; but if they chose to fill their pockets by prostituting their official positions, what business was that of his? The idea that he was doing anything personally dishonorable probably never entered his mind.

Why should it? He was aided in the transaction by a legal firm of high standing and eminent respectability, who would have kicked out of their office any client who should have dared invite them to aid him in planning a burglary. His associates, who knew his plans and helped to carry them out, were gentlemen of unblemished commercial honor and social repute, who would have exploded with righteous wrath had any receiver of stolen goods invited them to share in a picayune robbery. His purchase of the franchise from the aldermen was matter of common fame, yet no man among his business or social acquaintances uttered a word of condemnation or reproof, or gave him any whit less cordial greeting; and no investor hesitated to buy from him at retail what he had bought from the aldermen at wholesale. The same sort of thing has been notoriously done on even larger scale by men who sit in the front pews of churches and are looked up to as successful men.

As he sits in his prison parlor to-day with the shadow of the state prison upon him, it is but natural that Jacob Sharp should regard himself rather as unfortunate than as a criminal.

It is well that Jacob Sharp should go to prison, even though a thousand men as guilty as he be left outside. But it is idle to hope to cure corruption by such means. Judges from the bench may utter condemnation and reproof; preachers from the pulpit may thunder warnings and appeals; the press may deliver its platitudes, and the politicians vociferate their outcries for reform, and even an occasional 62 be sent to prison, but still where the carcass is there will the eagles be gathered p. 4, col. 2 together, and the only study of the unclean feasters will be to avoid, not publicity, but legal detection.

Consider how we train our boys for the business of life. Consider the ideals we hold up to our young girls. How carefully we point our children to the examples of men who have succeeded, and warn them against the examples of men who have failed. Succeeded and failed—in what? In carrying out that golden rule which underlies all true morality and is the basis of true social economy? No! The examples we uphold for their imitation and admiration are of men who have succeeded in eluding poverty and grasping wealth; the failures against which we warn them are of men who have been thrust backward in the hustle for existence, who have literally failed to get ahead of their fellows, who have neglected the motto, “Each for himself, and the devil take the hindmost.” To a generation trained in such a school the fate of Jacob Sharp conveys no warning, save the warning not to be found out. To them the lesson of the Sharp trial is that thousand dollar bills should not be used in bribing aldermen.

And while the fundamental law of justice is disregarded in our social organization it is useless to hope for any change for the better. In a society founded on theft, greed and lawlessness must still hold sway. Our social system is so arranged that the vast majority of men and women must, of absolute necessity, be sunk in poverty. On whom the awful lot shall fall—on us or on our neighbors—is, for many of us, a question still undecided; but on them or on us we know the curse must surely come, and a remnant only shall be saved. What wonder is it, then, that like panic-stricken men upon a sinking ship, who know of a surety that there is room in the boats for but one in a hundred, we should struggle and fight and crowd? What wonder that we should fling to the winds honor, and fair dealing, and loving kindness, and all the Christlike virtues? What wonder that Jacob Sharp should have bribed the aldermen, and thought it but the purchase of an honorable provision for his children?

Our courts and newspapers and preachers may make an end of Jacob Sharp, the individual. They can never, by their present methods, make an end of the class to which Jacob Sharp belongs. To put an end to stealing we must dig up stealing at the root.

THE NEW FOURTH OF JULY.

Copy linkEdit

Never since the war that abolished chattel slavery has a celebration of the Fourth of July been so significant and hopeful as the celebration of the present year. The Declaration of Independence has acquired a new meaning to scores of thousands of people in the past twelve months. They had often read its assertion that all men are created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights, including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; but they had read them as “cushioned-pew Christians” read the Lord’s prayer. The words sounded well, but there was no life in them. They had no relation to us, no application to the present. They were only rhetorical flourishes to the record of an old quarrel. Historically they were interesting, but for present use they were as impracticable as Christ’s golden 63?

But there is a great awakening. The Declaration of Independence is no longer a string of phrases. It contains a living truth which “hearts wide open on the Godward side” are welcoming and proclaiming. In several of the great cities of the union, and in many a country town and village, the Knights of Labor celebrated this anniversary as one of peculiar interest to men who work for a living. The orations to which they listened were not platitudes about the past, but exhortations to duty in the present. If all men are created equal, it is our duty to see to it that this natural equality is not impaired by human laws and institutions. If life is an inalienable endowment, then water, sunlight, air, soil and all other forces and substances of nature necessary to sustain life are also inalienable endowments, which, if lost, may be at any time reclaimed. If liberty is an inalienable endowment, then laws that force men into servitude by shutting them out from natural opportunities are an unwarrantable interference with natural right, as well as laws that force them into the servitude of chattel slavery, and, like the latter, may be repealed at once and without compensation. This was the drift of thought that met with enthusiastic responses at the various celebrations of our national birthday this week.

The Fourth day of July is the anniversary of the birth of our political liberties. To the work of that day we trace our possession of the most powerful weapon ever put into the hands of men—the ballot. But political liberty is a mockery and the ballot will be a plaything where industrial slavery prevails. We must have more than political liberty. We must also have back for the use and enjoyment of all those bounties of nature without which a man can neither work nor live, save by submitting to the charity or ministering to the cupidity of a fellow man. And in aiming at this the Declaration of Independence is an all-sufficient authority to Americans. Its assertion of equality is as fresh as when it was penned. It is a truth that can never be obsolete, but will grow in brilliancy as time goes on. It was the guiding star of the revolution, and to its magic power, at a later date, vested rights of property in man gave way; but still it points to further advance along the line of liberty. We are as yet far from realizing the full measure of its promise.

A PHILADELPHIA paper congratulates p. 4, col. 3 the workingmen of that city who live in whole houses upon the difference between their condition and that of the New York workingmen who live in crowded tenements. If the editor of that paper would calmly reflect, with the aid of a fan and a glass of ice water, upon the disparity of condition to which his attention has been casually directed, he might be able to write on the land question with more intelligence than he has thus far done.

CO-OPERATION under the prevailing system of land tenure is and must be a failure; but with the land free its possibilities are beyond calculation.

A WRITER in a recent number of Harper’s Magazine, telling of a tenement house in which mechanics live, says that the rent of rooms on lower floors is so much a month, and if the tenant wants better air and light, he may take a room on one of the upper floors for a few shillings additional. And yet the writer of that article does not see that those extra shillings are nothing but the price of air and sunlight, for which one man charges and another pays. Private ownership of land is equivalent to private ownership of air and sunlight. “God is good to the landlord,” said the Scottish crofter, and the well-fed parson responded “amen!”

MR. BENJAMIN URNER, the treasurer of the Anti-poverty society, asks us to state that the certificates of membership in the society are now coming from the press, and will be sent to members so soon as they can be signed by the officers of the society, probably within two weeks.

HERE is another suggestion for Archbishop Corrigan’s next pastoral. In the coal regions of Pennsylvania the surface of the earth caves in at different places, making deep basin-like holes into which water collects and forms ponds. Last winter the miners of Mahanoy Plane, in Schuylkill county, Pennsylvania, undertook to gather ice from these places for summer use, but the owner of the land forbade them unless they would pay so much a ton for all the ice they gathered. The owner of the land, by the way, made neither the land, the water, the ice, nor the holes.

FOURTH OF JULY AT SUMMIT HILL.

The Sort of Independence They Have in the Lehigh Valley—Miners Paying $3.50 a Ton for Coal—Poverty in the Midst of Unbounded Natural Opportunities—The Mysteries of Overproduction.

SUMMIT HILL, Carbon Co., Pa.—Our coal miners celebrated the Fourth of July by having a parade, speechmaking and a picnic in a grove near the town. Over a thousand men marched in the parade, the speeches were fair to middling, and the picnic a great success.

It was at Summit Hill that the first body of coal was discovered and developed in Pennsylvania; and by paying a quarter to a more or less ragged urchin a person can have the enjoyment of looking down into the hole from which the first coal was taken, can have pointed out to him the track of “the burning mine,” can go into any one of the mines to see the coal in its natural state, see the mules that are used down in the bowels of the earth, and can have pointed out to him how well fed they are and how sleek they appear. Then, after coming to the earth’s surface, the visitor will have an opportunity, for the same quarter, of enjoying the beautiful views on every hand. Well may this region be called the Switzerland of America. The boy has earned his quarter, and the average visitor is satisfied.

But there are other things to be seen and learned free of charge, if the visitor is of an investigating turn of mind. Two miners can mine on an average sixty tons of coal a day, for which they receive $3.78, with a deduction of five cents a day for oil, cotton, etc. A cent on the dollar is kept back by the company a miner works for, for hospital purposes. The entire average expense of digging out, cleaning and placing a ton of coal in a car ready to be delivered to the consumer is, at the outside, forty cents. By the time that coal reaches the consumer, say, in New York, it costs to the very poor, who buy it by the bucket, about $11 a ton. Those who purchase a ton at a time have to pay between $6 and $6.50. The coal is on the surface at Summit Hill, but the miners are not allowed to touch it for their own use. If they want coal, the companies sell it to them at a reduced rate—$3.50 per ton. There is no middle man in this case, and the cost for transportation is but a trifle, yet we have to face this problem: We get about forty cents for doing all the work necessary to produce a ton of coal, yet if we want to use that very same ton of coal we have to pay back to the men who paid us the forty cents for our work, nearly nine times the price; and for that $3.10 extra they have charged us they have not even turned their hands.

All the land, the woods and water on Summit Hill and adjacent hills are owned by the Lehigh company. In the village of Summit Hill the houses belong to the occupants, but the land on which the houses stand belongs to the Lehigh company. The tenant has a right only to use the surface. Whatever may be discovered under the surface belongs to the Lehigh company. The village taxes must be paid by the house owner. The lease is a long one—namely, ninety-nine years—but most of the miners are under the mistaken impression that they have a perpetual title to the land they live on. It is gratifying to note, however, that none of them will live long enough to find out their mistake. Their children will be the sufferers, and the Lehigh company will be the gainer when these leases fall in. While the Lehigh company own such a tremendous domain, stocked with coal, they pay no taxes on it; the land which is being mined pays taxes, but the taxes are paid by the lessees. and the land which is not being worked pays no taxes. Yet no one can go on that land and work without settling affairs at the Lehigh company’s office.

Last winter, when the production of coal was stopped and the price increased to the consumer, there were hard times on Summit Hill; and yet, while the miners here were suffering for want of work—or, in other words, for want of permission to dig coal out of the ground and sell it to New York—the poor of New York were shivering in their tenement houses for want of coal. A few coal barons had met together in a New York office and decided that coal mining should cease for a time, and it ceased accordingly. This was euphemistically called an over production of coal. It is noticeable that there was p. 4, col. 4 at the same time an over production of flannel, shoes, sugar, coffee, etc., which things lay unsold in the Lehigh valley stores, waiting till the miners should be allowed to earn money to buy them with, the miners’ wives and children being meantime barefooted, poorly clothed and hungry.

Some of the speeches made here on the Fourth have set people thinking. Our miners are beginning to understand what over production means, and to see that life is rendered hard for them, not because they have to mine coal, but because they are not allowed to mine it.

The Fourth in the Coal Regions.

64, Pa., July 5.—The Fourth was observed here by the local labor organizations in the old-fashioned way. A grand picnic was held by local assemblies 5,605, 7,373, 6,399 and 8,187. Their parade to the picnic grounds was participated in by post 177, G. A. R., and St. Joseph cadets, an organization composed of young men of the local Catholic congregation. About 2,000 men were in line, and four bands and two drum corps enlivened the march with their music. The opening speech was made by William Lester, L. A., No. 1, of Philadelphia, his subject being “Organization.” He was followed by James Degnan of New York, who spoke on the Declaration of Independence, and pointed out the logical results of a full interpretation of its principles. The speaker’s assertion that the claim of the land for the people found its basis in the Declaration of Independence was warmly applauded. The marshals of the day were C. C. McHugh, W. D. Boyle and John Nevins. The crowd attending the picnic was orderly, and no liquors were for sale on the grounds. Mr. Degnan, after closing his remarks, was taken to Nesquehoning, where another large picnic was being held, and there spoke again. Land and labor clubs are being formed in this part of the state, and the demand for THE STANDARD is increasing weekly.

The United Labor Party on Independence Day.

The united labor party of New York city celebrated the one hundred and eleventh anniversary of American independence by a mass meeting at the Academy of Music, which was attended by a large and enthusiastic assemblage of voters. Professor William B. Clarke presided, and speeches were delivered by John McMackin, Rev. C. M. Winchester of Middletown, N. Y.; Frank Ferrall and James P. 65?

The Declaration of Independence was read by Mrs. Clara Hackett, the audience pointing by their applause the paragraph which cites, among the grievances complained of by our forefathers, the “transporting us beyond seas to be tried for our offenses.”

The speakers all strongly emphasized the truth that the principles of the united labor party are simply those announced in the immortal declaration, and the audience evinced a keen appreciation of the fact that the party of labor emancipation is striving only to obtain a recognition of the truths to the maintenance of which their ancestors pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.

Miss Munier’s Concordia chorus was in attendance, and sang several patriotic songs, chief among which was the “Song for the Fourth” published in last week’s STANDARD.

The New Wine in the Old Bottle.

NEW YORK, June 25.—It is refreshing to read your wholesome criticism of the “jubilee.” I am an Englishman, but not one who has bent the knee to that very useless person dubbed “queen” on the fiftieth anniversary of her accession; and I am disgusted at the hypocritical praise which has filled the representative journals of this country for some days back. In one sense the jubilee was consistent. The oppressors, paupers and social enemies of Europe and of the east vied with each other in doing homage to the figurehead of oppression, and to the mythical being whom they set up as vindicator of their wrongs. If these things have made England great and English people free, then, indeed, was the ceremony praiseworthy.

A BRITISHER.

Failures in the First Half of sic.

A recent issue of Bradstreet’s contained the statistics of failures in the United States for the six months ending July 1, sic. The total was 5,072, with liabilities of $55,359,829; in the same period of 1886 the number was 5,461, with liabilities of $53,241,431. In New York city there were 94 failures in the first half of 1887, with liabilities of $1,785,713. Bradstreet’s regards the “failure scare” as pointing to healthful underlying conditions in the business world. The proportion is, on the whole, no greater nor less than the running average. It is a settled conclusion that, under the prevailing system, many business men must fail. If the average is not swollen largely it is cause for congratulation—to the solvent.

How to Dispose of the Ludlow, Vt., Farms.

ALLEGHENY, Pa.—Not long ago the New York Nation referred to a rich valley in the town of Ludlow, Vt., which had gone out of cultivation, and which, on that account, the legislature had been asked to exempt from taxation for a term of years.

If the farms are abandoned by their owners (as the Nation implies, but which I doubt, for who then is asking for a remission of the taxes?) let the state throw them open for occupancy to whomsoever will take them and pay such a rental as the land will afford. If no one can make a living on them they will, of course, lie fallow. If there is competition for them this will serve to fix the tax or rent.

E. Y.

The Movement in Pennsylvania.

The Knights of Labor of Dauphin county, Pa., held a convention on last Saturday at Millersburg, and nominated a full ticket. The candidates are pledged to accept the nomination of no other party. The platform adopted declares that the land belongs to the people, and expresses sympathy with Dr. McGiynn.

At the Fourth of July celebration of the Knights of Labor at Pottstown, Pa., a preamble and resolutions were passed declaring that all born into the world have an absolute right to the products of their labor, and also a right in the land, from which their subsistence must be gained.

No Hope in Political Churchianity.

WILMINGTON, Del., June 26.—I am a reader of THE STANDARD. I believe that this crusade is a political Christianity that embraces the purposes and promises of God to men; and that it must bring order out of chaos, light out of darkness and peace out of discord and confusion. You cannot hope for anything from a “political churchianity.” A great political movement must be on a level with Christianity.

STEWART CARLISLE.

The Land Question in Alabama.

CALERA, Ala., June 27.—I have read your “Social Problems,” “Progress and Poverty,” “The Land Question” and THE STANDARD, and am satisfied that the theories you advocate are correct. The time is not far distant when every fair, unprejudiced mind in Alabama p. 4, col. 5 will believe as I do. Your “Land Question” is telling the tale. Our people are reading it attentively. The prejudices that have kept them back since the war are fast dying out. New men with new ideas and liberal views are coming to the front. God send the day when your works will be in every house in the land.

W. H. DAVIDSON.

As Manufacturers They Lacked Brains to Succeed, as Land Owners They Didn’t Need Any Brains.

PATERSON, N. J.—The “society for sic useful manufactures” of New Jersey was organized in 1791. Its charter exempted it from state taxes for ten years and from local taxes forever. The founders located at Paterson, and purchased seven hundred acres of land for $8,230, or $12 an acre. They started in to manufacture cotton goods on a grand scale, but failed ignominiously, and the charter passed into the hands of the Colt family. The society retained its lands, however, and to-day is drawing an income of $70,000 per annum in rents, having already sold $600,000 worth of lots. They control the water rights, which ought ere this to have made Paterson the greatest manufacturing center in the east, and can easily double the power used in the manufacturing concerns of the city by simply allowing the power supplied by the Passaic to be utilized.

The land they purchased for $12 per acre is now worth $275,000 per acre. They failed in all attempts to do what their name implied they should do, and it was not until other manufacturers located here that the society made money. They began to make it then, and have continued ever since, although it was all earned by some one else.

E. W. NELLIS.

They Want It Right Here, and as Soon as Possible, Too.

ST. PAUL, Neb.—Professor Swing of Chicago thinks that for those who want free land there is enough in Africa or South America. But we don’t want to go there. We want the land right here in the United States. Fifty-five millions of people give the land its value, which a small fraction enjoy. Professor Swing may go to Africa if he pleases, but the rest of us prefer to stay here, and mean soon to enjoy our equal share in the value of the land.

WIDEAWAKE.

The Railroads and Real Estate.

Grand Rapids Workman.

> Speaking of booming real estate brings to mind the interest and excitement of late in the neighborhood of the Union depot. All that section bounded by Fulton street on the north, Ellsworth avenue on the west, and Almy street on the east, and any distance south, has suddenly become very valuable. Mr. Woodcock has been the main purchaser and has raised the rents of many of his tenants. He has purchased not far from a dozen homes inside of a few blocks and is now considerable of a landlord, and although he may be a bitter opponent of English landlordism he will quite likely do some evicting if they don’t come to time. Many amusing things are related in the neighborhood of his negotiations and purchases. A certain physician owns a place on Calder street, and in giving his price to Mr. Woodcock in making out the bill of sale the buyer’s hand trembled in his anxiety lest the physician should back out, so the gossips say, and the M. D. was very angry with himself when he discovered the purpose of the purchase. A grass 66 sold two places at the maximum price; she also became very excited when she made the discovery. A widow woman on Almy street asked $3,000. Mr. Woodcock, in order to make the bargain more binding, made it $3,500 of his own volition. The widow then backed out and now asks $5,000. It is a sure thing that in selling to railroad companies you must strike while the iron is hot. After the company gets enough territory to cut up with their tracks then they will fence you in with smoke and sulphurated hydrogen, and you can’t give away your home. It now looks as though it was only a question of a short time when the whole country that has been so much talked of in the papers lately will be completely depopulated so far as residents are concerned.

Not Born Free and Equal.

Correspondence Providence People.

> How can there be noble aspirations when there is no discontent with present surrounding? The very discontent among the masses is the surest sign of healthful life and hope. Why shut ears and eyes and plant the heavy foot of power on this spirit struggling to formulate itself into shape? Liberty and equality among men is so far only an ideal worth striving for, but only possible after the existing state of society is altered so far that it may be possible that every human being born may have an equal and free opportunity for a full physical and mental development.

As long as the land is held by a few, as long as a minority exists which does enjoy full liberty of action, by infringing upon the natural development and freedom of action of the majority—it is impossible. Not alone does this minority absorb all the surplus value from the toiling majority as interest, dividends and rents, but it robs this majority of the precious time wasted (in producing this surplus value) which otherwise might be put to their own betterment and development. To-day we are not born free and equal, nor have we any immediate prospect of working our way toward liberty and equality, because there is lacking the spirit of fraternity.

Houses and the Death Rate.

Boston Transcript.

> Mr. Noel A. Humphreys read a paper of much interest before the statistical society on “Class Mortality,” in which he drew attention to the fact that in the Peabody buildings in London, which now accommodate some 20,000 persons of the poorer classes, the number of infant deaths has been reduced seven per 1,000 below that of infants in London generally during the last five years. This shows, he said, how much housing has to do with our rate of death; and this is confirmed by the fact that the poorer classes who live much in the open air, like gardeners, nurserymen and agricultural laborers, attain an average age almost as good as that of clergymen themselves, in spite of their much greater privations. It is impure air, in the long run, which shortens life even more than any other cause.

Another Opinion of the “Post’s” About Cursing.

Evening Post, July 5.

> Yesterday was a day in which there surely ought to have been some cursing done about battle flags. Yet, as far as we can learn, the leading cursing men were silent. . . . This shows that the cursing men have not the influence with God Almighty which they evidently thought they had. . . . Their curses, in other words, they see now, are wasted on the desert air. As far as can be ascertained, what God Almighty desires is that Americans should hereafter dwell together in harmony.

Barry’s Opinion.

Cincinnati Enquirer.

> COLUMBUS, O., July 4.—Hon. T. B. Barry of Michigan, member of the executive board of the Knights of Labor, who is in the city, said in answer to a question put to him by your correspondent to-night: “The George anti-poverty movement is here to stay. It is a second abolition movement and is gaining adherents daily. In 1888 there will be a national united labor ticket, and you will find by that time that the union labor party will have been swallowed by the George or united labor party.”

And They Need Not Have Worked Either.

St. Paul Dispatch.

> How many of the old settlers of Ramsey county look back on lost opportunities? A few hundred dollars wisely invested in land five, ten or fifteen years ago would make the happy possessor a millionaire to-day.

p. 4, col. 6

SOCIETY NOTES.

Copy linkEdit

Nearly all the summer residents have arrived at Newport and are comfortably settled for the season and about ready to engage in the fashionable gayeties which are being arranged. A few small cottage entertainments have already been given. On Monday next the Casino orchestra will give its first morning concert, from 11 a. m. to 1 p. m. The first of the series of semi-weekly dances will be given the same evening. The Sunday evening concerts at the Casino will be given as usual, but no loud playing will be heard and the puritanical portion of the community will not be seriously annoyed.

The slaughter of the innocents has begun. Last week 679 deaths occurred in the tenement houses of this city. The highest mortality of the year was reached yesterday. During the twenty-four hours ending yesterday evening 128 infants died in the city, and fully seventy-five per cent of these deaths can be traced to heat, bad ventilation and unwholesome milk.—[New York World of July 3.

The Albany Express, speaking of the children sent into the country by the Tribune’s fresh air fund, says: “Every year hundreds of these unfortunates are given a sight of green fields, a breath of fresh air and a realization of what the surroundings of civilized life should be. The people of New York’s ‘pauper counties’ have often seen the smiling faces of these poor and unfortunate children of the metropolis, smiling at leaving the oppressive and crowded tenement districts and getting a sight of God’s country.”

Mr. Wm. K. Vanderbilt sailed in his yacht Alva, July 2, on a voyage around the world. It costs $10,000 a month to run the Alva. Mr. Vanderbilt’s railway interests will be looked after during his absence by Cornelius Vanderbilt and Chauncey M. Depew.

William Divens, an iron worker of Pittsburg, accidentally brought an iron bar which he was holding into contact with a monster fly wheel. The bar was driven through his neck, coming out at the base of the brain and protruding from the other side about three feet. Divens was fifty-two years old, a widower, and left several children.

Senator Farwell is going to Europe in August on business. He and Colonel Abner Taylor of Chicago are at the head of a mammoth land enterprise in Texas, and it is on affairs connected therewith that Mr. Farwell is going abroad. Colonel Taylor is spending the summer over there on the same business. They will come home together in October.—[New York Tribune.

The people of this country imported, during 1886, cotton goods to the value of $3,730,671. They paid $1,701 sic for the privilege of doing it, besides an average profit of twenty-five per cent to the merchants who advanced the duty money.

A tramp went to the basement door of the residence of Mrs. Augusta C. Burdette, 229 West Twenty-fifth street, on Friday evening of last week, and begged for food. Mrs. Burdette brought him into the basement, fed him well, and gave him some money. He left the house, but sneaked back, and when Mrs. Burdette went up stairs she found him leaving the parlor with a bronze clock and a handsome cuspidor. A policeman was called and he was arrested.

The quotations from Wall street are received at Newport as quickly as they can be wired, and on Bellevue avenue two prominent New York broker firms are established. Four private wires are in use, and one broker has a private wire at his cottage.

A burglar raided the grocery store of Henry Lubbe in Indianapolis one day last week. A policeman came up while the burglar was unlocking the door, but supposing it was one of the clerks made no effort to arrest him. The burglar talked to him and asked him to come in, and after he had gone finished his work. Only some small change was secured.

The profits of the cotton seed oil trust for the year ending July 1 were $2,439,720.75.

Horace Dalrymple Whitney, the defaulting secretary of the Montreal harbor trust, is said to be in New York. Whitney brought about $30,000 stolen money with him. He is said to be a dude, English style, and wears a monocle.

The number of cases of infanticide in this city is alarming. Reports of dead infants’ bodies found on doorsteps, in the ditches and in the water are numerous, and it is a subject for adverse criticism that it is the exception when the party who commits the crime is arrested and brought to justice. Such a state of things is to be regretted, and all the more so because of the general feeling of indifference that seems to be growing in relation to the matter. A few arrests and severe punishments of child murderers will have a tendency to reawaken popular indignation, and bring the indifferent public to a full appreciation of the enormity and hideousness of the crime—[Boston Traveller.

William H. Vanderbilt’s tomb on Staten Island cost $500,000, and it costs $30 a day the year round for the services of detectives to guard the body.

Dr. J. B. Taylor of the sanitary bureau of New York city says that an effort must be made to stop diphtheria in the tenement house districts immediately. He states that carelessness on the part of occupants of tenements is one of the chief causes of the spread of the disease.

There is an institution in Boston for the reception and care of homeless and destitute cats.

The Riverside rest association, of which the Rev. Dr. Wendell Prime is president and W. M. F. Round, secretary of the prison association, is a vice-president, has opened its house, 341 East Twenty-sixth street, for the reception of inmates. The association extends a helping hand to women discharged from the various hospitals and correctional institutions supported by the city, giving them lodging, clothing and assisting them to find places. In order to preserve the self-respect of the women it requires that they shall do something to earn their board, and to this end has opened a laundry and a sewing room. The association is prepared to take in plain sewing and to communicate with persons in the country needing servants.—[New York Times.

Mrs. 6768? has declared her intention to become a citizen of the United States. Her chief reason for doing this, she told a New York World reporter, is that she “has invested in real estate, and intends to invest more.” Mrs. Langtry apparently thinks it is the custom for American citizens to own real estate.

During the six months from Jan. 1 to July 1, 1887, 212,655 immigrants were landed at Castle garden.

The prince of Wales originated the idea of the jubilee jugs which, to the number of 35,000, were distributed to the children in Hyde park last week. His royal highness was much struck by the distribution of rough brown cups bearing the imperial cipher in relief, with which the czar commemorated the marriage of the czarovitch, and the productions of Messrs. Doulton, which cost nearly sixpence each, are great improvements on the original. The ground is of polished cream-colored earthenware, and the two portraits of the queen (1837 and 1887) are artistically executed in neutral tints.

E. L. Harper and Benjamin E. Hopkins of the broken Fidelity bank in Cincinnati have been committed to prison in default of bail.

Fourth of July will be a busy day for Secretary and Mrs. 69. The clerks and employes of the navy department have been invited to a picnic at “Grasslands.” On the Whitney grounds at “Lay Farm,” about two miles from “Grasslands” from a thousand to fifteen hundred poor children from Washington will be entertained. Between Secretary Whitney and Senator Cameron the children of the capital will remember July 4, 1887.—[New York World.

The wife of the high sheriff of Galway, Ireland, has invented and patented a jubilee brooch and a jubilee bangle, both of which the queen has examined and commended.

An Admission to be Noted.

New York World.

> It is true that no direct issue based on a great principle now exists as between the democratic and republican parties.

Page 5 of 8contents

THE STANDARD, SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887. 5

p. 5, col. 1

Father McGlynn.

With Apologies to “Father O’Flynn.”

London Saturday Review.

Of priests, though we offer a charming variety,
Mostly distinguished for larnin’ and piety,
Less than by zeal for uprooting society,
70 McGlynn is the boss of them all.
Here’s a health to you, Father McGlynn;
More power to your elbow, I hope you may win!
Loudest of preachers,
And first of the teachers,
Whose creed takes its features
From Father John 71.
Divil a man or a pope that can frighten um;
No! and when sic was afther invitin’ um
Over to Rome, he’d have gone to enlighten um
Freely, but not to be laid on the shelf.
Yes; I will venture to give ye my word
Never the likes of his logic was heard.
Archbishop Corrigan
Wished him in Oregon,
Sure he’d, begorra! gone
Better himself.

Haven’t ye heard of that ruction delectable,
When (it was “nuts” to the classes “respectable”)
Father McGlynn found no diff’rence detectable
’Twixt a landlord’s and a land leaguer’s line[!?]
“What!” he exclaimed, “are ye meanly content
With ‘jewing’ down landlords some twenty per cent?”
Off wid your flummery!
Out on your mummery!
Such was his summary
Way wid O’Brine.

“Lansdowne and he are but birds of a feather, boys;
Take an’ compare them, I tell ye, together, boys;
Is it a ha’porth’s consarn to us, whether, boys,
Leaguers or landlords are winning the day,
O’Brine believes Lansdowne owns Lansdowne’s own land,
While us, glory be! we brave boys understand
That his and his neighbor’s
Is all of it labor’s,
And proposes, be jabers,
To take sic away?”

Bravo! Well said! Here’s a health to your riverence!
Viewed by the light of that candid deliverance,
Communists wearing their creed with a difference,
Parnell-fashion, look mightily small.
Long live then, O Father McGlynn,
Such spurious stamps to the counter to pin,
Scornfully flouting
Their pestilent spouting,
Who babble, while doubting
The creed of John Ball.

THE POOR MAN’S COURT.

Copy linkEdit

The poor man’s court is the criminal court. But for it he would hardly know there is a law of the land; but for him it would have little to do. The rich seldom feel its power and always escape the severity of its procedure, while the poor are forever at its bar or under its hostile shadow. No censure of judges is here intended. The charge of favoritism, so frequently made, is unjust. It is the system, not the men who manage it, that is responsible for the onesided administration of justice which bears so heavily upon the 72?

The practice of requiring bail bonds is a striking example of the unequal operation of criminal law. As bail must possess property equal to the penalty of the bond an inequality between rich prisoners and poor is manifest. In country places, where personal reputation is diffused through the community, a poor man’s past conduct may obtain for him as ample bail as his rich neighbor can command; but it is not so in large cities, where classes are distinct and the only friends of the poor are the poor themselves. In fixing bail the prisoner’s pecuniary resources are usually considered, but there can be no allowance sufficient to place an accused person whose friends are poor upon an equality as to his liberty with one whose friends are rich; consequently the rich man goes free pending his trial and the poor man is imprisoned.

How can this inequality be remedied? By carrying into practice that fundamental precept of criminal law which presumes every man innocent until his guilt is proved. Preliminary imprisonment contravenes this precept, and is as unnecessary in the majority of cases as it is illogical and oppressive. A pledge to appear for trial would answer every purpose. If the accused appeared, the only defensible object of preliminary arrest would be accomplished; if he absconded, judgment by default would make him an exile for life and rid the community of a worthless member. If, however, justice cannot be satisfied without vengeance, fugitives could be brought back from any state of the union under extradition laws; and as bail may reclaim their prisoner wherever found, defendants might be released in the custody of official bail, who could pursue them to the ends of the earth. Doubtless this would impose additional expense upon taxpayers, but shall personal liberty be weighed in the balance with pocketbooks? Are mercenary considerations to prevail against the plain right of a man to be free, until by crime duly proved he forfeits his freedom? If so, let us go a little further in the interest of the taxpayer, and lock up everybody who cannot give bail for good behavior. That would wholly relieve the state of the pecuniary burden of criminal trials, since the forfeited bail bonds of those who became offenders would defray the expense of arresting and convicting them.

To parole persons accused of crime would be regarded, at first, as an impracticable innovation, utterly without precedent and fraught with great danger to law abiding classes. But let it be remembered that once civil actions, too, were begun by arresting the defendant and putting him under bail when he could get bail, and into jail when he could not. That cruel practice was abolished despite the protests of law abiding classes, and so may be its twin sister of the criminal law.

The system of fines also automatically discriminates against the poor. A fine inflicted by way of imposing costs would be unobjectionable, if it were only a charge upon the offender’s property; but when the alternative of payment is imprisonment, fines operate to free the rich and incarcerate the poor. ’Ten dollars or ten sic!” is a familiar formula in police courts. To the poor it means ten days in jail; to the rich, no more than a slight addition to the cost of the carousal which brought them into court. 7374?75? is supposed to be obsolete, but it survives in the fine. Modern fines, like the ancient wehrgeld, are sales of indulgences to those who have the money to buy.

There are some hardships of criminal procedure which would seem to operate equally against rich and poor, but the poor suffer most from them all. In theory prisoners are presumed to be innocent until proved to be guilty. With the rich man, surrounded by a p. 5, col. 2 host of reputable and influential friends, the theory usually holds good in practice; with the poor defendant it is reversed. True, certain evidence is required before a jury is permitted to convict, but beyond that the presumption of innocence has little weight in “prison cases.” An atmosphere of guilt pervades the prison pen, and indictments cast a shadow upon fettered defendants which neither judge nor jury can ignore. Judge Cowing once instructed his officers from the bench about bringing “criminals” to court. He meant persons under arrest upon accusation, but thoughtlessly expressed a latent sentiment, one from which nobody familiar with the poor man’s court is wholly free, that imprisoned defendants in criminal cases are criminals. In police courts this latent sentiment is aroused by the natural tendency of magistrates to act upon the evidence of policemen regardless of the asseverations of friendless prisoners.

In jury trials the accused is almost at the mercy of prosecuting officers, who are supposed to act with judicial impartiality. But the judicial office and that of the advocate are incompatible. Impartiality is a light weight in the scale against professional zeal, ambition and pride. The public expects district attorneys to convict, and they try to please the public. In doing this they have every advantage. The treasury of the state is behind them, detectives respond to their beck and call, jurors regard them as unbiased vindicators of the law. Every practitioner at the criminal bar, and every prosecuting officer can testify to the numerous incidental advantages of district attorneys over their professional adversaries. Not least among these is the privilege of choosing the time for trial. It often happens, when the prisoner is notified to be ready and is ready, that the district attorney arbitrarily postpones the trial; and though postponements may be dangerous, if not fatal, to an honest defense, and at any rate involve expense, there is no appeal. On the other hand, when the prisoner is not ready, though by no fault of his own, and the district attorney is ready, nothing but the discretion of the court lies between the accused and an unfair trial. That all this is specially burdensome to the poor sic is obvious.

When convicted the poor prisoner gets what is called his “deserts.” When acquitted he must bear with the indignity and shame of a criminal trial as best he may and pay his expenses if he can. As there is no mercy for the guilty so there is no redress for the innocent. This injustice, which is only irritating to the rich, reaches the livelihood of the poor.

Once defendants were not allowed the aid of an advocate. Under the disadvantages of shame and impending disaster they were compelled to address the jury in person or go unheard. And it is not long since they were first permitted to testify. Within this decade men have been convicted in the federal courts, whose evidence, if they had been permitted to give it, might have acquitted them. Judge Benedict once suspended sentence after listening to a convict’s story, upon the ground that the jury would have rendered a different verdict if the story could have been told to them. It was merciful of the judge, and he did all he could; but think of an innocent man under suspension of sentence for crime! When these barbarities of the criminal law were in vogue it was the poor who suffered most from them. Rich prisoners were usually sufficiently cultured to make an intelligent argument; the poor were dumb. The habits of the rich were such that their transactions were generally known to competent witnesses; the comings and goings of the poor were often unknown to any but themselves. Criminal procedure has been reformed in these particulars; but the same spirit that dictated such outrages upon justice prevails yet. Within the purview of that spirit accused persons are criminals who must be exterminated, and every melioration proposed is mawkish sentimentality.

But the criminal court is the poor man’s court in a sense far more odious than anything thus far touched upon suggests. Who are the criminal classes? Are they not the poor classes? Go into any police court when a “big haul” has been made over night and look at the prisoners. A cloud of poverty hangs over all. Go into the special sessions and watch the victims of the law who pass from the prison to the dock and back again to prison. Is not poverty the grim artist that designed their fate? Go to the general sessions. Here three judges, and three panels of jurymen, and three prosecuting officers, with a grand jury in the background, daily grind a never-failing grist of prisoners, nearly all of whom are poor. Few have ever felt the refining influences of decency and comfort, and those that have were cast into the maelstrom of poverty before they were pitched into the hopper of the criminal court.

Only those offenses that are peculiar to the poor are reached by penal statutes. The crimes of the rich are too subtle to be detected by the cumbersome processes of law, or are of a kind which society approves and statutes foster. Most conventional crimes which the courts succeed in punishing are either violent or predatory in character. Few men sic the latter for the first time except under stress of poverty; sic as to the former, the tendency of poverty to generate violence is so well known as to have found expression in a vulgar proverb: “The passion which the rich man humors by kicking his wife’s lap dog the poor man gratifies by breaking her skull.” That poverty breeds crime is tacitly admitted when the poor woman is imprisoned and the rich kleptomaniac goes free. We would not say, above a whisper, that the poverty of the one is proof of her guilt; but we do not hesitate to say that the wealth of the other establishes her innocence.

Upon the streets, at all hours, are bootblacks and news boys and news girls. What kind of homes have they? A great mass of poor men are continually out of work. How do they live? Industrious men are compelled to rear their little ones amid scenes of squalor, wickedness and criminality that would distort the morals of an angel. What can be expected of earth-born children? It is of such material that criminals are made. Pressure of want and familiarity with vice provoke an offense. Arrest, conviction, sentence follow; and with cropped hair and striped suit, a new candidate for penitentiary education is matriculated in the freshman class of crime. At the end of his term he comes out with a callous conscience and a name indelibly stained. If he have ability he may aspire to leadership in some branch of criminal industry, but it is almost futile to hope for honest employment. His sic is in the rogues’ gallery, and, like Jean 76, he must hide from the police to escape their constant surveillance. The avenues to labor which were 77 before are now barred as well. Henceforth he is a professional criminal.

In the early days of the African diamond fields, when each man worked for himself, when the fields were open to all, and every one kept what he earned, there was no diamond stealing. But as the fields were appropriated, and diamond digging began to be carried on by hired labor, the independence of diamond diggers diminished, and diamond stealing coincidently became a common crime among them. Law after law, penal in character, was enacted, but without other effect than to excite the ingenuity of p. 5, col. 3 the thieves. As poverty came in at the door, honesty flew out at the window. A similar coincidence is observable in the United States. As the independence of laborers has diminished, census statistics show that crime has increased. In 1850 the proportion of penitentiary convicts to population was as 1 to 4,107; in 1880 it had increased to 1 in 1,637. It is easy to attribute this to the influx of a low foreign element; but that explanation is not tenable. The ratio of crime among our foreign population, as indicated by the number of penitentiary convicts, was but little greater in 1880 than in 1850, while among native Americans it had increased more than threefold.

That there is a vital relation between poverty and crime cannot be 78. Statistics point to it, observation confirms it, the experience of the criminal court proves it. The relation is one of cause and effect; poverty is the germ, crime the fruit.

If poverty were dependent upon the will of the individual, or even upon natural conditions, society might escape responsibility for crime notwithstanding its source. But poverty depends upon neither the one nor the other. It is forced upon the individual by society. Nature is not at fault; it has bountifully provided everything that man requires. The individual is not at fault; he is willing to do all the work necessary to adapt natural objects to the satisfaction of his wants. But society is at fault; because with parchment 79 it has erected a barrier between men who are willing to work and the natural materials, without which they cannot work. The efforts of sympathetic people to assuage the hardships of criminal law, to lighten the burden of convicts while under sentence, and to reclaim them when released, are inspired by a spirit that deserves unstinted commendation. But if it were not for landlordism, an institution that could not exist without the support of these very people, and through which they acquire the means to gratify their tender sentiments, there would be no occasion for charity, no worthy object for pity. In the light of this truth the nursery rhyme of the “Considerate Crocodile” has a new and striking application:

There was once a considerate crocodile
That lived on the banks of the river Nile;
And he swallowed a fish with a face of woe,
While his tears flowed fast to the stream below—
“I am mourning,” said he, “the unhappy fate
Of the poor little fish which I just now ate!”

Access to those natural materials that are essential to labor, whether they be of air or soil or water, can be had only through access to the surface of the earth. The surface of the earth, to the uttermost limits of civilization, is owned in perpetuity by some of its occupants, whose permission is a prerequisite to its lawful occupation by all others. For that permission the owners exact a fee proportioned to the profitableness of the particular spot for which the fee is asked. Those who can pay the fee are allowed to work for themselves; those who cannot are compelled to hire to those who can; those who can neither pay the fee nor find a “boss” are forced into the ranks of the unemployed. A conflict between the unemployed and the employed follows, the object of the former being to get work, and of the latter to keep the work they have. The conflict is called competition; the weapon is underbidding; the battle ground is the labor market.

So long as this conflict continues, compensation for work will decline, enforced poverty flourish and crime prevail. It will continue and grow fiercer while population increases and invention advances, unless the land of the world be restored to its natural owners. But to secure to all men their birthright in the soil would open opportunities for work so inexhaustible that the conflict would cease for lack of combatants.

Remove the parchment bonds with which labor is bound, and the poor man’s court will be needed no more. As Wendell 8081? once said, “Open to man a fair field for his industry and secure to him its gains, and nine hundred and ninety-nine out of every thousand would disdain to steal.”

LOUIS F. POST.

CUTTING ADRIFT.

A Prominent Republican of Colorado Leaves the Old Party to Fight for the New Issues.

James W. Bucklin of Grand Junction, Col., has written a letter to the members of the republican legislative committee for the counties of Mesa, Delta, Montrose, Gunnison and Pitkin, formally resigning from the chairmanship of that body and from membership in the republican party. He does this in order that he may throw in his lot with the united labor party. He says that the republican party has not attempted to meet the great issues which have lately arisen, but is content to continue to live on its past deeds; and the democratic party is so like it that the two might be a consolidation under the name of the republican-democratic party.

“But outside of either party,” says he, “have arisen political principles so just, so full of the spirit of American institutions, so far reaching in their beneficent influence upon all, that they deserve the support of all.

“These principles aim at the abolition of poverty, the actual decrease of want, intemperance, anarchy and crime, the increase of wages, the simplification of government and purification of politics, and the strengthening of that religious sympathy and love of duty which ‘makes the whole world kin.’ Their essence is love of country and obedience to her laws.

“So long as no political organization advocated these principles independent political action could not materially advance them. But now these ideas have been crystalized by the united labor party, and in the political struggle to secure their adoption I desire to engage.”

Ringing Resolutions From a K. of L. Assembly.

Copy linkEdit

RICHMOND, Mo.—At a recent meeting of Eureka assembly 1080, K. of L., the following resolutions were unanimously passed:

Resolved, That we sic that the earth was created by God for the people who should be born on it.

Resolved, That we believe that the only way this equal right to nature’s bounties can be asserted and maintained is by taxing land to the full amount of its rental value, as proposed by Henry George.

Resolved, That we indorse the principles of the Anti-poverty society, and will do all in our power to abolish the system which makes the mere privilege to labor a boon, builds almshouses and prisons within the shadow of churches, and lauds as benefactors of humanity men who “furnish employment” to labor.

Resolved, That we indorse the action of Dr. McGlynn in refusing to go to Rome, and denounce foreign ecclesiastical interference in American politics.

Be it further resolved, That we indorse and support Henry George and Dr. McGlynn in their battle for the cross of the new crusade.

CEPHAS LUELLEN, M. W.

J. C. WILLIAMS, R. S.

The Boom in California.

San Francisco Call.

A boom prevails in many counties, especially in the south. Land which was unsalable last year at $50 is now held at $200 and $500 an acre. We hear of sales, which may or may not have been real, at $800 or $1000 an acre.

p. 5, col. 4

A PENNSYLVANIA MINING TOWN.

Mahanoy Plane and Its Surroundings—God’s Goodness to Mr. Shafer—It Takes a Day’s Work to Buy a Ton of Coal, Though a Few Minutes’ Work Will Mine It—Ringing Fourth of July Resolutions.

MAHANOY PLANE, Schuylkill county, Pa.—Mahanoy Plane is a miners’ village, about fifty miles south of Wilkesbarre. It is in a cluster of towns, among which are Shenandoah, sic, Frackville and Mahanoy City. Coal mining is the only industry, and the population is wholly of the working class. According to one of the inhabitants “the Almighty spent thousands of years preparing this region for a man named Shafer.” Mr. Shafer owns nearly all the land. He leases mining rights to the Reading and other companies and to individuals at thirty-five cents a ton for all coal mined. The miners do not average a tenth of that, from which it appears that it is much more profitable to own coal in the ground than to take coal out of the ground. Mr. Shafer at one time sold building lots, but now he only leases them. And when he sold them it was only the surface that he parted with; mining rights were reserved. The average pay of a miner here, as the year runs, is $7.50 a week. Board is $20 a month. The whole region is a shell. The entire valley is sinking, and is everywhere dotted with great holes where the earth has caved in. The place maintains one school, which is attended by girls of all ages and by boys under ten. At from nine to ten years of age the boys leave school to take employment in one of the “breakers.” These “breakers” are dark and dismal buildings, full of coal dirt and dust, into which rocks of coal are taken from the mine to be crushed. After passing through the crushing rollers, the coal of various sizes is passed through a cylinder sieve into 82, with a series of openings along the sides. At each of these openings a breaker boy sits ten hours a day picking slate from the coal, and handling every separate piece of coal and slate that comes down the shoot. As the boy grows to manhood he is promoted to be a laborer in the mine. This duty takes him hundreds of feet below the surface of the earth, where he loads the coal into cars to be carried up to the breaker. His next promotion is to the position of miner, and there his advancement ends. When old age unfits him for mining, he returns to the breaker where his monotonous life of toil began. Old age here is from forty-five to fifty.

The Knights of Labor are well organized throughout the region and their fundamental principles are well understood. The doctrine of the land for the people has a strong foothold. It would be strange if it had not, for in no place is the curse of poverty. and dependence so clearly traceable to private ownership of land. Though coal in its natural state is abundant, it costs the miner a full day’s work for less than a ton of it—a day’s work in which it is not unusual for him to turn out fifty or a hundred tons. Though the whole mountain side is covered with rock none can be had for building purposes without paying a landlord twenty-five cents a 83. Though there are so few houses that the country seems to a traveler to be almost without population, most of the people are compelled to be tenants. Though the supply of coal has never yet equaled the demand the miners are kept idle three or four months in the year. And this sentiment respecting the land was emphatically declared at the celebration of the Fourth of July this year. Three assemblies of the Knights of Labor met at Frackville. Frank O’Boyle presided. John Bell read the Declaration of Independence and Louis F. Post of New York delivered the oration. During the proceedings the following resolutions were adopted:

“On this national anniversary we reiterate the sentiment of the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; and since both life and liberty are dependent upon the right to the use of the earth, and the pursuit of happiness is made hopeless by private burdens upon industry, we assert that all men are endowed by nature with an equal, inalienable right to the land upon which and out of which they must live, and that every man is entitled to the full enjoyment of the products of his own labor. Therefore, we demand that land be taxed to its full value, and that labor be freed from all taxation.”

The Land and Labor Demonstration in Cincinnati.

Copy linkEdit

CINCINNATI, July 5.—The land and labor men of this city and vicinity held a grand demonstration in the grounds of the Zoological garden yesterday. Despite the threatening weather and one heavy rain storm, upward of ten thousand were present, and the managers of the garden say that such a large and orderly crowd never assembled there before. During the entire day and evening there was not a sign of drunkenness or a breath of disturbance.

The conference of delegates from the states of Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky was called to order in the gardens at 11 o’clock.

Dr. A. S. Houghton of Cincinnati was chosen chairman, and Charles F. Kipp of Columbus, secretary.

Rev. E. P. Foster, A. E. Burkhardt, M. H. Spillard, C. F. McLean, H. T. Ogden, A. W. Fries, Otto Sennser, C. S. Walker, A. P. Miner and W. W. Bailey were chosen vice-presidents.

H. T. Ogden presented the following declaration of principles, which was unanimously adopted:

We hold that all inequality of conditions arising under and made possible by the present economic system spring from the monopolization by the few of the natural opportunities which are the common rights of all; and therefore,

  1. We demand the abolition of all taxation on improvements and the products of industry, and we advocate the raising of all public revenue by a single tax upon land values, thus preventing the holding of tracts of unused land and the taking for the general benefit of those values which are created solely by the growth of population.

  2. As a logical sequence of the above we advocate governmental control of the railways, telegraphs, telephones and other means of distribution and communication that are in their nature monopolies.

  3. We further advocate a reform in our fiscal system by which our medium of exchange shall issue direct from the national government.

Hon. S. B. Williams of Indiana presented the following resolution, which was adopted and ordered telegraphed to Dr. McGlynn:

Be it resolved by the representatives of the united labor party of Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, in conference at Cincinnati, that we send fraternal greeting, love and congratulations to Dr. McGlynn, and bid him God-speed as the greatest apostle of the new crusade.

Then W. W. Bailey, state organizer of the land and labor party of Indiana, and Messrs. Dunlap, Wynn, Bracken, Pohling, Kile, Goodenough, Williams, Thompson and Webster, from the several large towns in the three contiguous states, told how the land and labor party was progressing in growth, and to this Henry George added his testimony as to the

p. 5, col. 5
marvelous growth of the new party in New York and through the Union.

On motion of Mr. Williams of Indiana the following resolution was adopted:

Be it resolved, That we, the representatives of the Henry George idea of Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, in conference assembled at Cincinnati, deem it expedient and necessary that a national conference or convention be held in October, 1887.

We authorize and request Mr. John McMackin of New York to appoint a committee of five, of which he shall be chairman, to issue a call for said convention, fixing the time, place, ratio of representation and details of said convention.

At 1 o’clock the conference adjourned, and at 3 o’clock the public observance of the day took place in a beautiful natural sic, in which a large platform had been erected for the speakers and delegates.

A. W. Fries of Cincinnati read the Declaration of Independence with splendid effect.

Joseph R. 8485? of Chicago, editor of the Labor Enquirer, followed with an sic speech, which aroused much enthusiasm. He contrasted the present condition of the working masses of the country with that which it would have been if the principle of the declaration had been fully carried out; pointed out that the equal right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness included the equal right to land, and declared that in the struggle for the recognition of equal rights to the land in the method proposed by the resolutions adopted by the conference, he recognized the first great step to the full emancipation of labor, and that upon this point the hosts of labor should concentrate their strength.

Henry George was then introduced and made a speech which roused the audience to the utmost. He apostrophized the Declaration of Independence not merely as the charter of a nation’s liberty, but as a still grander declaration of the rights of man, showed him sic all our national difficulties and dangers come from our failure to fully recognize the fundamental truth it sets forth, and pointing out how the condemnation of chattel slavery involved in the declaration had at last been vindicated, declared that the struggle to vindicate this fundamental truth further had now begun. To fully establish the American republic on the enduring basis of equal justice to all is the task of the men of the present.

We must make this a country not of tramps and of millionaires, but a country of self-employing, independent freemen. We must make this a country not of tenants, but of homes. This movement that we have commenced, this movement that is participated in not only by the men who have met here today, but of hundreds of sic elsewhere, has this for its aim, and it must go on conquering and to conquer.

This is the day of little things; but next year will begin to see this movement swell and grow. No matter who stands against it, whether it be the power of the schools, of the pulpit, of the press, or the power of the pope of Rome (applause), it will go on. Already it is being recognized that there lies at the bottom of this movement a deep religious sentiment. Such men as Dr. McGlynn (applause), such men as Hugh O. Pentecost, such men as Father Huntington, such men as your own Mr. Foster, they may as yet be but few, but they represent the greatest of all powers, the power of a moral conviction, the power of that religious sentiment that recognizes the brotherhood of man and the fatherhood of God. (Applause.) Men animated by this sentiment will spare nothing, will halt before nothing, will shrink from no sacrifice to bring again the kingdom of God on earth and to make this world a likeness of that which we hope for in a better life to come.

Hon. S. B. Williams of Indiana followed in a strain that so pleased and amused the audience that he was with difficulty allowed to quit. He addressed himself particularly to the allegation that the farmers would not consent to abolishing the present system of taxation in favor of a single tax on land values. This, he said, was nonsense. The farmers of the Hoosier state were ripe for the change, and would become its enthusiastic advocates. He illustrated in an amusing way the manner in which the present system of taxation bore upon the farmers, and showed that under it the independent, self-employing American farmer was in sure and rapid process of extinction. Mr. Williams’ manner was no less happy than his style. He will do great work in the campaigns of the new party.

Mr. Rosshan followed in German, making a ringing address that roused those who could understand him to great enthusiasm, and putting in some noble work for the new crusade, after which the meeting adjourned for dinner.

In the evening Henry George made another speech, and was followed by Mr. Edward Hoffman in German.

And it Would Start a Great Many Other Booms Besides, a Building Boom, too.

Correspondence Anoka, Ky., sic.

The question of abolishing all taxes on buildings and improvements is receiving no little attention throughout the sic, and already is gaining great favor in many sections. The friends of the scheme argue that it would inaugurate the mightiest building boom the country ever experienced. Here’s an illustration: Two men each own a five hundred dollar lot, and one erects a five hundred dollar house; he pays not only twice as much tax, but often pays three times as much as the one who holds his lot vacant. The man who builds improves his property, helps the town and is enterprising, but he has to pay for his folly, for lo! and behold! the assessor comes around and, in nine cases out of ten, the lot is assessed higher than the one unimproved. This may seem queer, but it is true in hundreds of 86?

This looks to me as an injustice. Taxing the land only would relieve the man who improves of taxes on improvements, while the man who won’t improve has to pay just as much tax as the other. To-day in Anoka there are a large number of unimproved lots owned by non-residents, which have never been assessed at anything near what they are worth, while improved lots right alongside of them are assessed considerably higher. Let me give you a pointer: A reverend gentleman in Kentucky has been the owner of a great many lots in Anoka for many years, and not until the last few years have they been assessed for more than one-twentieth of their real value, and the result has been he has held on to these lots, refusing to sell unless he was paid considerably more than their actual worth. Recently a gentleman desired to purchase a lot of the Kentucky resident, upon which he desired to erect a neat cottage, and received a reply to his letter informing him “that the lot was not for sale at present.” I think if these lots were assessed at their full value, or upon the basis of a land tax only, it wouldn’t be long before I should see many of them covered with neat residences.

Ireland’s Jubilee Year.

Dublin Freeman’s Journal.

Irishmen, at all events, have no statistics of national progress to stimulate them to manifestations of rejoicing for the mercies of fifty years. The record runs the other way. We know that since the crown was placed on the head of Queen Victoria 1,225,000 of the Irish race died of famine; that 3,668,000 were evicted; that 4,186,000 fled across the sea, as though escaping from ravening beasts of prey, to seek shelter from her rule and its consequences. Yet when England gives thanks to the Almighty, with all the accompaniment of brave pageantry, for the good that has accrued to the English people, there is no thought of the innumerable woes and immeasurable suffering that has been the lot of the Irish people.

p. 5, col. 6

Content.

Translated from the German by J. L. Joynes.

My dear good people, be 87?
Howe’er in this bad world ye fare,
The lot in life that God has sent
Like Christian soldiers ye must bear.
For if ye still your Lord obey,
The world will wag its ancient way;
No gift that God on earth has sent
Can e’er be better than content.
And if ye get no work to do,
And if your shirts are torn and old,
And if ye starve and shiver too,
And ache with hunger and with cold,
Bethink ye, ’tis not all on earth
Can share its happiness and mirth;
Nay, these are to the wealthy sent;
The people’s portion is content.

And have ye lost your little all,
Or are ye crushed by others’ crime,
Still dreading what shall next befall?
Bethink ye, ’tis but for a time.
Nay, let them do the worst they may,
Ye still can sing, ye still can pray.
Howe’er your days on earth be spent,
One thing ye still may keep—content.

Content shall be my one delight,
Content shall all my glory be;
In tatters and in rags bedight,
No nobler virtue can I see.
And if in rags and tatters old
I die of hunger and of cold,
Write o’er my grave, “This good man went
And died at last of sheer content.”

STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND.

Copy linkEdit

If Dr. McGlynn expressed himself as reported his language may still further damage him in the estimation of Rome, but some very well established and very stubborn facts are to be found in the language. They may grate upon the feelings of the Vatican and its machinery all the harsher for being facts undeniable and indisputable.—[Chicago 88?89?

The Cork, Ireland, Eagle reprints from THE STANDARD the full text of Dr. McGlynn’s speech before the Anti-poverty society on May 29, and in an editorial in the same issue, beginning with the statement that “Ireland does not stand alone on the land question,” gives an explanation of the plan and sentiments of the new crusade.

On the upper west side the Henry George movement is progressing wonderfully. Its organization is perfect, and its members are not merely enthusiastic, but clear headed and intelligent exponents of their ideas. At their meetings one is struck by the incessant flashing of shrewd common sense from every part of the room.—[New York Uptown Visitor.

One hundred thousand Catholics of New York in mass meeting recently supported Dr. McGlynn by a series of speeches and resolutions which have been forwarded to Rome. How many of these will stand by Dr. McGlynn in his startling defiance of Rome is problematical. Evidently a crisis in the Catholic church in America is at hand.—[St. Louis Evening Chronicle.

The wonderful growth of popular respect for Dr. McGlynn has undiminished hold on his old friends, and the vast array of thinking men and women who now harken to his voice, prove the greatness of the man who has planted the cross of the new crusade in America. He has lost a parish, but gained a continent. He will regain the parish, and retain the continent.—[Exchange.

There seems to be no limit to the advance in favored localities, but these high prices increase the rents demanded of working people, who are now fearfully crushed by the exactions of the landlord. The tenement house system is one of the horrors of the city, and it will be worse before it is better. The only deity known and feared in such districts is the landlord, and as for tenement house morals, they are just what you might expect under such a system.—[Utica Herald.

While we cannot wholly agree with the reverend gentleman as to his theories and plans for the emancipation of the wage worker and laborer, we do admire his independence and the manly stand he has taken against foreign dictation as to his rights and privileges as a citizen. Should Dr. McGlynn again visit Buffalo Truth will accord him a hearty welcome and bespeak for him such treatment at the hands of the press as his scholarly attainments and numerous following entitle him to.—[Buffalo Sunday Truth.

I have not studied the subject as yet, although I believe it is to be a political issue, and one which will make itself heard at the next presidential election. Please take up the subject and study it pro et con, remembering this: If Mr. George’s theories are founded on just principles they will prevail, sooner or later; if, on the contrary, they are merely the hair-brained emanations of a fanatic they will come to naught. But do not make the mistake of giving a verdict without hearing the evidence.—[Editorial notes in Mobile Sunday Times.

The Anti-poverty society already exhibits a phase from which much good may be expected. Dr. McGlynn in his addresses is constantly resurrecting the Christianity of the time of the apostles. He will not palliate or seek to mystify simple truths. With him a camel is not a dromedary, and a needle’s eye is not as large as the door of a cathedral. He is not afraid of telling “good news” to toilers, who are the modern poor. This is right, for their appeal for justice has long been made in vain to the fashionable churches.—[New York Social Science.

One of the planks to be presented at the Syracuse convention is a modification of sic theory in regard to land, of which Mr. George has recently constituted himself the champion. There is so much that is alluring in this theory that one would really like to see a feasible plan proposed to carry it into practice. How is the land to be got out of the hands of present owners into the hands of the public without violating those constitutional provisions which were adopted for the protection of minorities?—[San Francisco Call.

So far all the objections that have been brought against this doctrine of the “land for the people,” instead of injuring have tended to strengthen and spread it, for, however men may differ as to details in bringing it about, the clearly defined and incontrovertible proposition that “the land of a country belongs to the people of that country, and not to a set of individuals called land owners” is gaining headway. It is also gradually becoming understood that the laws regulating the tenure of land are not immovable, as were the laws of the Medes and Persians, but can be changed to meet modern requirements.—[St. Louis New Order.

There are more evictions in New York, more cruel evictions and more causeless evictions, than there are in unhappy Ireland. Hard to believe, is it? Well, it is true, and it can be easily proved. There are landlords here, as there, who have men to manage their property. They don’t wish to know how bad it is, and leave it to heartless agents, the slave drivers of the north, to do all the dirty business for them. Some of them are churchmen. Some are churches; for it is a fact that gilded sepulchers own some of the foulest dens in New York. Tell the owners that they are keeping pest houses, and ought to be shut up in striped clothes for manslaughter and they hold up their holy hands in deprecation. “Oh, no! It is the dirty tenants! You cannot force them to be clean!” A lie, this; a foul, dastardly slander, as every owner of a decent, well kept tenement will tell these hypocritical monsters. It is a cowardly attempt to shift blame on to other shoulders which belongs to them. And—shame that it can be said—a laggard, lazy and inefficient board of health indorses their excuse.—[New York World.

We Don’t, Eh? And Pray, Who Is “We?”

Cyrus W. Field’s Mail and Express.

There are a good many islands in the Pacific in need of population, and McMackin and his crowd had better go to them. They can make Dr. McGlynn their king. We don’t want people here who think this government a disgrace. Americans are proud of it, and if foreigners don’t like it they had better stay away or go away.

Page 6 of 8contents

THE STANDARD, SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887.

6

p. 6, col. 1

GANSEVOORT MARKET.

Copy linkEdit

It is not in the west alone that one may grow up with the country. The annual increase of land values in New York city is greater than the value of the wheat crop of Kansas. The annual tax imposed by New York’s land owners in rent on the labor and active capital of the city exceeds the assessed valuation of all Dakota. Forestalling land in New York city pays better to-day than dealing in St. Paul lots or Nebraska farms. But the New York speculator must generally command a large share of wealth in order to enrich himself out of the ever-advancing land values of the city. As a matter of fact, most of the increase goes to estates already 91?93?

Loud as has been the condemnation of land monopoly in California, of alien land ownership in Texas and of railroad land grabbing on the public domain, the most 90 examples of the evils of land monopoly to be found in America may be witnessed in New York, if its people will but see them. In the west the outcry against the first barriers raised between settlers and free land is because they are often placed there illegally. In New York city the barriers between land and the poor have long sic; if they are raised higher from year to year, it is done legally, and, though their height and strength have evoked comment, it has seemed absurd, in the face of law and tradition, to endeavor to break them down.

But men of this generation are thinking. They are seeking the emancipation of labor and the unfettering of productive capital. They will not rest with the knowledge that the times are out of joint. They are bent on righting what is amiss, and, in order to find the fundamental wrong. they sic scrutinizing the various ways in which the worker is being deprived of much of what he produces. That wrong found and destroyed, the abolition of lesser wrongs will follow.

It is not difficult in New York to detect the operation of the greatest legalized wrong—the one through which the larger share of the wealth created by business men and wage workers passes into the hands of toll gatherers, who ever stand by ready to grasp that which they have not exerted themselves in producing. A 92 improvement, public or private, in any part of the city is invariably followed by an advance in the price of real estate—of land—in the locality. Rapid transit, a new bridge, a new park, each gives additional rent to the owners of the land. All things considered, the rest of the community remains much in the same condition as it was before the improvement was made. The volume of New York’s business may expand at a rate far greater than that in which its population increases, yet the average percentage of profits for its business men—and especially its smaller business men—does not increase. It decreases. Wages do not increase on the average. They fall. But rents are ever rising in nearly every part of the city. Elevated roads may take thousands of people miles away from the business centers, but rents quickly rise in every newly built up quarter, until, with car fares and time lost in travel, they are on a level with rents in the older parts of the city. Increased activity in the business of a locality may arise from such a cause as the opening of the Brooklyn bridge, and as a consequence rents be doubled, as they were in Park row when that bridge was finished. Every phase of the city’s development adds to the wealth and power of its landlords. The privileges they possess exceed those of the feudal sic, for unitedly they may tax New York’s labor and active capital to the last cent that can be borne. If the the reader desires proof that it is the land holder who is the real oppressor of the worker, whether business man or laborer, he is invited to look into the facts in connection with the rise in real estate values in that dismal part of New York round about Gansevoort market.

That section of the city lying between West Fourteenth street, Thirteenth 9495? (the river front), Jane street and Eighth avenue forms a four-sided figure that needs its upper and lower boundaries to be extended but a single block eastward to become a triangle—that is, if Jane street, running northeast from the river, were cut through, it would strike Fourteenth street at Seventh avenue. Within the quadrilateral mentioned are twenty-seven city blocks, hardly two of them the same size, however, as a number of lateral streets diverge from Eighth avenue to the west and southwest like the sticks of a fan, and while the flat-iron shaped blocks near Eighth avenue are small, those near the river are larger than the average city block. The uses to which one of the larger of these twenty-seven blocks has of late years been put, and to which two more adjoining it are to be put, have caused land values to rise in the other twenty-four, and, indeed, to a slight extent, in even a larger area, the gradual rise in values toward the highest point resembling a hill having its culminating ridge centering around the three blocks in question, and tapering off until it is indistinguishable from the lay of the land in general.

Let the reader look over this district with us. Three blocks south of the foot of West Fourteenth street is Bloomfield street, which is but a single block in length, and two blocks further down is Gansevoort street. On the northeast corner of the latter is the corporation yard, about an acre of ground inclosed by a high, unpainted close board fence. It is the depository of worn out materials belonging to the city departments. If we walk up Gansevoort street and stand just beyond the eastern end of the corporation yard, we will see to the east and north an almost entirely open area, about twice the size of Union square. West street runs north and south through it as far as Bloomfield, and there, veering a little to the east, it becomes Tenth avenue. The great open block lying to the east of West street has five sides. It faces on Tenth avenue, Little Twelfth, Washington, Gansevoort and West streets. The farmers’ wagons standing about in it indicate its use. It is a country produce market. The two blocks between West street and the river, Gansevoort and Bloomfield, are uninclosed, save as to the part taken up by the corporation yard. But there stands on them what looks like a squatter’s stable—an old, tumble-down, one story affair—and a blacksmith’s shop that apparently dates from the time of Tubal 9697?, the rest of the space being an unsightly receptacle for rubbish and worn-out wagons. The scene in all directions is the uninviting one presented by an old and neglected quarter of a great city. There is not a tree in sight. Nearly all the buildings bordering on the open are battered and weather worn. Many are old stables, one story shanties, and shabby two and three-story old fashioned brick or frame houses. The colors prevailing in the picture are the finger marks of time, soot from adjacent lead smelting works, dust from the streets and from rag warehouses near the river, and smoke from a cluster of blackened pottery chimneys standing back of Little Twelfth street, fit monuments to the dirty and dreary neighborhood. There are, it is true, two or three rather imposing new warehouses facing the open square, and two large new style tenement houses. But the only other clean and fresh objects that strike the eye are numerous new signs, which are

p. 6, col. 2

p6_fig1

[Map: street plan of the Gansevoort market district, west side of New York, bounded by West Fourteenth street, Eighth avenue, Jane street and Thirteenth avenue; the Farmers’ Market block (hatched) and the “Site of New Market” blocks marked. No caption. Labels as printed: W 14TH — W 13TH — LITTLE W 12TH — 13TH AVE — 10TH AVE — 9TH AVE — 8TH AVE — ST (several) — BLOOMFIELD ST — SITE OF NEW MARKET — Bogart St — GANSEVOORT — HORATIO — JANE — WEST ST — FARMERS MARKET — WASHINGTON ST — GREENWICH ST — HUDSON ST]

[continued from c1, below map] hung out over every shanty and basement and ground floor. They advertise the business of dealers in butter, cheese and eggs, hay, grain and feed, and fruits and provisions. When, a few years ago, these new signs were swung out on those old buildings, the real estate facing the market place trebled in price, and rents went up in proportion. It was when the farmers’ market was established here and the provision dealers followed in their wake to the locality.

A walk of four blocks up Gansevoort street brings us to the small triangular block at Gansevoort, Hudson and Little Twelfth streets. There is a decided change in the scene here, for men are at work on new buildings in all directions. Gansevoort, from the market place to Eighth avenue, a block east of where we stand, has been widened fifteen feet, and new brick business houses are going up where old tenement dwellings were torn away. Off on Eighth avenue and Hudson and Thirteenth streets are houses newly painted and having new stores on the ground floor.

Gansevoort and Little Twelfth streets are two of those mentioned which join like the sticks of a fan, and so, turning down Little Twelfth, a walk of four blocks takes us back to the river. Little Twelfth, with its bad pavement, miserable tenement houses and foul stables, is indescribably mean. But in walking through it toward the river one may see new houses being erected in adjoining thoroughfares. The improvements in some quarters, and the lack of them in others, have their significance when all the facts are known. Let us stop a moment and get an outline of the history of the locality.

During the war of 1812 a fort was built near what is now the foot of Gansevoort street, the purpose being to prevent British ships from passing up the river. It was named Fort Gansevoort, in honor of General Peter Gansevoort, U. S. A., a native of Albany. After the war the city acquired a part of the fort grounds, which was in later years sold or granted to Joseph B. Varian. In 1863 it was repurchased for market purposes for $533,437, sic that time it has been regarded by real estate dealers as the future site of a great market. It possesses many advantages for the purpose. It borders on the North 98, is two miles north of Washington 99100?101?106?, and is rendered easy of access by the many streets leading to it. It was not until 1879, however, that the Bleecker street car company’s stables, which had stood on part of the grounds, were demolished and the farmers’ market established upon it. By act of the legislature the use of the new market was restricted to farmers bringing their produce to the city, and they were forbidden to carry on their traffic in any other place. Formerly they had on market days. lined sic, West and Greenwich streets, from Washington market northward a long distance.

The Farmers’ market, paved, but uncovered, extends 299 feet on West street, 187.6 on Tenth avenue, 317 on Little Twelfth, 302.8 on Washington, and 366 on Gansevoort. It has room for 350 wagons.

In March, 1880, a bill was presented to the legislature providing for the removal of Washington and West Washington market to the two blocks lying between the Farmers’ market and the river. The West Washington market men—the wholesale butchers—thereupon held a meeting and unanimously voted to move to the Gansevoort site. It was at first proposed by them to erect their own market house. But Comptroller Hugh J. Grant, in 1884, gave it as his opinion that it was best for the interests of the city that it should itself build the market. The required plans for the structure, with the estimate of its cost, which was $468,050, were pigeonholed for two years, when the sinking fund commissioners authorized Comptroller E. V. Loew to issue $500,000 in bonds to pay for the work. The contract was given for $477,443. The new market, the finest in the city, must be finished by May, 1888. It will be of brick and about 400 feet square.

So much for the history of the three blocks belonging to the city which are pushing upward the prices of real estate everywhere in sight of them. Something can be told of the ownership of adjacent property. About one-third of the twenty-four blocks spoken of belongs to the Astor estate. With the exception of a few lots, all the land lying between Ninth avenue and the river and Fourteenth and Little Twelfth streets is Astor property. The block lying opposite the farmers’ market on Washington street, most of the lots on Lit tle Twelfth as far east as Hudson and a num

p. 6, col. 3 ber on the north side of Gansevoort street, all belong to the Astors. Let us ascertain what is the number of owners of property facing the three market blocks. Beginning at the river on the north side, the great block lying between Bloomfield and Little Twelfth streets, the river and Tenth avenue, is owned by John Glass. Mr. Glass has just put up ten five-story tenement houses midway in the block, the ground floors being fitted up as immense warerooms. As we have seen, the north and east sides of the farmers’ market are faced by property belonging to the Astors. The only building erected of late years on these blocks is a five-story tenement house at the corner of Washington and Gansevoort streets, built by a lessee of the lots. Of the two remaining blocks, those south of the markets, the one nearest the river is owned by G. B. Lawton, while the other is the property of four persons. Here are but nine parties standing close by a mint that for many years to come will continue coining dollars in rent.

It seems that the selection of this site for a market was not simply an act of our city fathers unaided by suggestions from interested citizens. The Market Journal in its issue of May 21, says:

“To secure the necessary legislation, overcome narrow and prejudiced self interest and bring about the building of this great and much needed market, has been a work of no small magnitude, and there are many who sicserve honorable mention in connection with it.”

Then follows praise for him who was unquestionably “the most diligent, untiring and effective worker in the cause,” and of those who “stood shoulder to shoulder with him in its advocacy”—all prominent real estate owners of the neighborhood. And then is given a list of lawyers “enlisted at different stages” in the cause. One may imagine the strictly legal methods adopted by these land owners and lawyers in furthering the worthy cause when bills were clogged in their passage through the legislature or while the scheme was slumbering for two years in the sinking fund commissioner’s office. But the 102 is constrained to speak of 103 where it ought not to have been expected. Hear the Market Journal:

“During all these long years of public spirited effort to bestow upon the locality the advantages and benefits of a great wholesale market, the Astors, though repeatedly appealed to, have never, so far as is known, contributed one cent from their plethoric resources to advance the issue. But that they are keenly alive to the progress made is shown in the recently advanced rentals of all their property in the vicinity. It is reported that the coming of the new market has already increased their annual revenue a hundred thousand dollars. They buy and lease, but never sell.”

We see there is not always the honor among money gathering men that people have a right to expect.

Suppose we inquire a little as to the rewards of the landlords hereabout—of those who were wickedly idle during the progress of “the cause,” alike with those others who had the merit of diligence and persistence in the duty of putting themselves in a position in which they could gather something while doing nothing. The information is not difficult to gather, for the tenant of the neighborhood finds doleful comfort in showing the gaping wounds that the landlord has inflicted in his bank account.

The 104, 204 by 199 feet, at Bloomfield street, Tenth avenue and Little Twelfth street, was bought a few months ago for $150,000. It was offered for sale three years ago at $90,000. On it stands a 105 unrivaled in New York in dirt and ricketyness. On the corner opposite, on the market square, stands a building owned by the city and leased by a politician for $1,200 per annum. The lessee sublets part of the building, the side yard, the back yard and the sidewalks to market men at a total sum which common rumor sets down from $6,000 to $8,000 a year. On the corner of Washington and Little Twelfth streets the proprietor of the pottery, a lessee of Astor land, has partitioned off what was formerly its front yard, a space about thirty feet in depth and eighty feet facing on the street, and erected on it four marketmen’s one-story cribs. The tenants pay $700 a year apiece for them. The four lots were offered a few years ago at $700 a year. Nos. 57 and 59 Little Twelfth street are now let at $1,300 a year, while not long ago they brought but $30 a month. Looking up Washington street we see new

p. 6, col. 4 five story tenements going up between Thirteenth and Fourteenth streets that sic the full block on each side. The Astors, quick to seize upon a certainty, say other real estate men 107, are running up these buildings. On the next block of Little Twelfth street as we move eastward are basements renting at $30 to $45 a month, which formerly were empty or drew $5 a month. The basement of No. 26 lets at $35. Nos. 14, 16, 18 and 20, one story market cribs, bring in $2,000 a year. Before the market opened the lot on which they stand was vacant and unproductive. At Thirteenth street and Ninth avenue, on a little flat-iron block, is Herring’s old safe factory, the ground floor transformed into a dozen marketmen’s stores, all but one or two occupied. Across the way on Hudson street another building is being similarly altered. Back in Gansevoort street the story of greatly increased rents is the same. Places that were $40 are now $60 and $80. A liquor store that in the old day brought the landlord $40 a month now brings $1,500. A tenant of one of the heroes of “the cause” on this street now pays $65 for rooms that he once got for $40. The small stores between Greenwich and Washington that formerly let for $10 and $12 are now $25 and $30.

There is not much real estate for sale in the district now. Several lots, however, are pointed out to the curious and their old prices and the present ones told. A lot on Gansevoort street, old price, $5,000; present price, $11,000; four lots on the same street, facing the market, old price, less than $20,000; present price, $80,000.

Rents in tenement houses as far away as Fifteenth street and Greenwich were increased the present spring one dollar on every floor, the building of the new market bringing laborers to the neighborhood. Small houses on Jane street now rent higher than formerly, because of the large number of salesmen the new market is to bring with it. The rent of stables down near the river was advanced so that truckmen’s horses were driven out of them and higher toned horses put in.

It is to be observed that the lessee from the great estates is on hand. He is the entrepreneur, taking risks and putting life into business, as becomes his character. A great estate leases a few lots to him for a term of years. getting from him a sure return on the best market rates of its land. He improves it to suit the customer, the improvement for a marketman being but little better than a chicken coop, and lets out his structure by the month or the single year, and if his tenant does a good business the live entrepreneur sees to it that the rent is promptly increased. If he can avoid it the lessee neither improves nor repairs the property, but shifts all such burdens on the monthly or yearly occupant. The resultant “life” in business is a transfer to the fortunate lessee of the fruits of the hard work and business talents of his tenant. The total lack of improvements at many points near the market may be traced to the avarice of these middlemen between the great estates and the active business men.

Before ending our walk, let us have an interview or two with some of the residents here. We see well enough what the real estate business is. Do these workaday folks here look on it in the same light as do we? Let us speak to this workingman with his coat off and wearing a blue woolen shirt. He smiles at our question knowingly. He points out this house on the market square which, six years ago, sold for a third of its present value, and that one, which the owner will not sell for any price that a buyer might mention. He tells us a story. A man owning a small house in the old days wanted to sell it and move to the country. His price was $4,500. A buyer was haggling with him about it from week to week. The buyer one day received a pointer from the inside ring that the market was surely coming. He at once called on the seller and offered his check for the $4,500. No, the seller had had news himself. His price was now $20,000. And the workingman smiles as does one who enjoys seeing a fine game, but regrets that he is not in it.

Here is a business man seated in front of his store. A word with him. Yes, real estate has gone up, indeed. His opinion, profoundly worked out in our presence, is that in some cases it has been doubled; in some again, advanced fifty per cent; in others, thirty-three per cent. Rents were stiff, especially on Astor property. There was a restaurant over there renting at $100 a month. It had had five proprietors eaten up in it in five years by that rent.

One more. A smart, well-dressed, middle

p. 6, col. 5 aged Irishman. He discovers himself as a landlord. Yes, yes. Real estate is lively. He and the other real estate owners have generally done much for the neighborhood in stirring up things. But those Astors do nothing. They are unpopular with the rest of the landlords. They do no more now than “Crazy” Astor did when he owned this end of the ward. He had seen him many a time, a man of unsound intellect going out riding with his physician. While he lived in a great house that stood in the middle of the block at Ninth avenue and Fourteenth street, a being that could not count, nor know values, nor attend to any business, his real estate was rolling up wealth for him. What was the total increased value of the locality since the farmers’ market came? No one could reckon it exactly. Somewhere between five and ten millions.

Our walk is ended; a good deal has been learned. If the Astors alone are richer by a hundred thousand dollars a year through the increase of rents near the Gansevoort markets, it is safe to assume that all the land owners there are drawing a total of three hundred thousand dollars annually—six per cent of five million dollars. In addition, the lessees are receiving a large amount from those to whom they sublet. But the bricklayers, laborers, truck drivers, market porters and salesmen are making only current wages, and the business men are struggling against advancing rents, which leaves them, on the average, with about what they could get from their labor and capital wherever else they could apply these means of obtaining a livelihood. The class that possesses the sites of the stores holds a taxing power over the rest that is limited only at the point at which the tenants may be driven away. Not a hand’s turn need be done by the landlord class in producing the wealth from which it deducts so large a percentage for itself. When the new markets are built, the landlord’s tax will surely go far higher than now, and will continue to rise with the earning power due to better facilities and the concentration of trade.

In the light of these facts. let us sic the “land” question for a moment. Somehow, when land is mentioned, men see in their mind’s eye a plowed field. They ought rather to see a city lot, for the land question is a question of values. While nearly all land is in the country, land values are mostly in the cities. Men figure to themselves to battle for land as between a frenzied farmer, defending his acres with firearms unto the death, and a mob of reckless wretches pouring out of the alleys of town and city. The real land issue lies in the main between the owners of business sites and residence lots on the one hand and the men ready, willing and able to use them, if vacant, or who do use them and pay rack rent for them on the other.

Assuming that the Gansevoort section of New York has increased five millions in value during the past six or seven years, we may make some comparisons between city and country land values. In the state of New York there are twelve agricultural counties, in each of which the value of the farms, including land, fences and buildings, is less than $10,000,000. If the improvements represent one-half the value, all the farming land of each of these counties is worth about as much money as the citizens of New York have put to the bank account of the Gansevoort land owners in a few years. The total value of the farms of the state of New York, land, fences and buildings, was in 1880 less than eleven hundred million dollars; the assessed valuation of New York city real estate was more than nine hundred millions.

Would it not seem reasonable and just if, instead of presenting to the Gansevoort land owners the premium arising from the growth of business in that district, society should take it for the benefit of those who created it—all the people? A like premium arises wherever men are competing for business sites or residence lots, for mines or farm lands. The vantage points best situated are something for which men are willing to pay if the vantage places are open to them. Why are some men permitted to close them off? No reply can be given founded on morals or expediency. This power to close the highways to wealth is the underlying social wrong.

In Gansevoort we have seen the evils of land ownership. There is a remedy for it. If in Gansevoort, and throughout the country, a tax on land values were imposed that would consume the rents for land, the results, on a little reflection, can be seen. No land of any value could be held unproductive. Landlords could not raise impassable barriers between

p. 6, col. 6 labor and land. Business men could not be blackmailed of their good will. Every worker could find land, at least, to labor upon. Homes would be possible to all. No other taxes than the land tax need be imposed, and all articles of consumption could be bought without their price being increased by taxes. Men could start in life without a handicap being put upon them by landlords. One man could not long profit by another’s labor.

Is This Anarchy, or Only Common Sense?

Hamilton, Ont., Times.

In a speech at St. Hyacinthe Mr. 108 touched the key to a solution of the whole financial difficulty. We quote from the report:

We had under timber license on the 30th of June, 1886, 46,078 square miles of forest; that is to say that speculators and lumber merchants held them under lease at the rate of two dollars per square mile, and in consideration of certain money payments on each log cut.

We have increased the rate of rent, and we have fixed it at five dollars per square mile.

The Ontario government has followed our example and increased the ground rent, though to a less extent.

Mr. Mercier finds it possible to increase the ground rents of the forest land leased by the lumbermen and speculators, because the value has increased. He sees nothing immoral in taking this unearned increment for the public revenue. Now, why should Mr. Mercier confine his operations to timber lands? All the land in the province is really held in lease from the “crown,” that is, the provincial legislature. The legislature delegates to the municipal councils authority to collect a rental for the use of the land, but the amount collected is by no means equal to the full rental value. The legislature has full power and right to increase the ground rent when additional municipal or provincial revenue is needed. Here is a source from which all the provinces can obtain plenty of revenue without any dickering with the federal government. The abolition of the subsidies can then be agreed upon, and the votes of the people can compel the Dominion parliament to reduce federal (indirect) taxation to a mere fraction of what it is at present. A result of the change might be that land speculators would have to go at some productive work to make a living, but that change need not be generally regretted. Keep right on, Mr. Mercier. An addition of $138,000 to the provincial revenue is not enough. Ground rents can be drawn upon for many times that sum, not only without injustice, but with great advantage to the working masses, who produce the wealth of the community.

“Out of Debt.”

Burlington, Ia., Justice.

“No, sir, I owe no man a dollar. I buy everything for cash. Ever since I commenced business I have kept out of debt.” So, the other day, spake unto us a Jefferson street dealer. “Well,” we said, “but—you have borrowed your store building and the ground on which it stands, have you not?” “Oh, yes; I don’t own them.” “What rent do you pay?” “One thousand dollars a year.” “How much of that is ground rent?” “About $700, I should think.” “Well, you are a logical man to assert that you are quite out of debt! One thousand dollars a year is the interest at seven per cent of about $15,000; besides as population grows so will that rent, for which your landlord has a lien (a first lien, mind you, that precedes all other claims, mortgages or even your own funeral expenses) upon your stock. And this is not all. In addition to borrowing at so high a rate a piece of the earth’s surface, you are taxed upon your stock, a tax that is a second lien, taking precedence of all claims but the landlord’s.

What do they assess you at? Two thousand dollars. Tax levy about fifty-five mills makes your annual payment sic. But more, as you can’t control the careless actions of the men occupying the offices above you, or the incendiary intentions of your financially troubled neighbors, your stock must be insured or you can’t sleep at night. Here’s more debt, is it not? You are insured on $8,000 the rate is one per cent or $80 a year. For watering the street you pay again $1.50 a month for eight months or $12 for the season. Out of debt! not much, my hard working friend; and there are yet many liabilities you have quite overlooked, but I will name only one more—the constant payments you are forced to make under the name of benevolences, to excursions, public exhibitions, bands in the public square, missionaries and churches. You know, as we do, that the lawyers and doctors upstairs, the bankers, the manufacturers, or clerks cannot easily be coerced, but you must buy, under fear of boycott, almost everything that is offered. Out of debt are you! Not much, Mary Ann!”

Creating Wealth by Labor.

Copy linkEdit

Faraway Moses writes from Pensacola to the Toledo News:

I took a stroll among the tenderfoot and club gentry of our city some time ago, and found them busy looking over some new maps and big rolls of paper, with black and colored streaks and lines and dots all over them. Being a little puzzled I asked them what they were doing. They told me they were drawing off cities for future generations to live in. They also asked me to help them out by buying some lots. Being a dealer in all kinds of lots myself, but sand lots, I naturally inquired what market value they had. They told me they had no market value except what they (the agency) would create by advertising in newspapers and railroad circulars, which would induce people to come there to build. Then they (the speculators) would raise the value of the lots to what the people could afford to pay. Not being very anxious to speculate in that kind of lots, nor understanding fully how to discount the future, I left them, and so the conversation ended.

Presbyterianism and Anti-Poverty.

Copy linkEdit

A correspondent who signs himself “A True Blue Presbyterian and a George Man,” writes to the Presbyterian Observer:

Clergymen are constantly wondering why the mass of the people take so little interest in the affairs of the church. An answer to their query in this regard is very easy—simply, that there is abroad an opinion that the church is out of sympathy with the masses, and I am sorry to say that I believe this myself.

Dr. McGlynn is spoken of as a revolutionist. What good man is not a revolutionist in the present state of society? Will any one go so far as to state that mankind has reached that acme of civilization, and that the millennium has already arrived? I would like to make the acquaintance of that man who is so bold as to say that. “I come not to send peace, but a sword,” says Christ.

A Philanthropist Who Provides Work.

Copy linkEdit

The Springfield Republican names a man in Northampton, Mass., who, it asserts, has for several years been supplying New England farmers with ignorant foreigners whom he picks up through agents as soon as they land, and induces them to sign cast-iron contracts to work for a certain length of time for about half the usual wages or forfeit everything due them. He “sells” these unfortunates to farmers at $10 a head and clears about $400 a month. It is asserted that he has placed 5,000 of them in the agricultural districts of the east.

For Pity’s Sake! Aren’t They Doing So?

Patterson sic.

The tenement houses of New York are a disgrace to American civilization. A writer in a July magazine, who describes graphically the disease, vice and crime resulting from overcrowded dwellings, states that the most densely inhabited portion of London contains 170,000 people to the square mile, while in New York there are similar areas containing 290,000. If Henry George and Dr. McGlynn would grapple with this monstrous evil, instead of advocating abstract economic theories, they might accomplish some practical 109?

Page 7 of 8contents

p. 7, col. 1
THE STANDARD, SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887. 7

The Masque of Life.

Copy linkEdit
The poor are growing poorer,
And the rich are growing richer;
The cannibal clothier fattens upon
The lean and hungry stitcher.

The mountains of gold which some have rolled
From above, around and under,
Burn gloomy bright as a comet at night,
And should make men weep and wonder.

Ghastly is the dance of death
Ghastlier the dance of being—
A masque fantastical and strange
To the hearing and the seeing.

One man lies on pulpy down,
Another lacks a bed;
One man eats and drinks his fill,
Another hath not bread.

The pale women in the factories,
The children dwarfed and ugly,
Dives, within his counting house
Secure, surveyeth smugly.

They cry, “We rot in these dark dens;”
He careth not a little.
They cry, “We swoon with toil;” but he
Thinks ten hours’ work too little.

Ghastly is the dance of death,
Ghastlier the dance of being—
A masque fantastical and strange
To the hearing and the seeing.

Lo! here comes a reverend doctor,
In the midst of all our troubles,
Wrangling and grimacing wildly
Over his own learned bubbles.

And he mingles with the masquers,
And he dances and he sings,
Scribbling on the eternal heavens
His grotesque imaginings.

Meanwhile, in the lanes and alleys,
Souls are slain for want of teaching,
Which might all have sung one tone
Of round music had they known
More of love and less of preaching.

Ghastly is the dance of death,
Ghastlier the dance of being—
A masque, fantastical and strange
To the hearing and the seeing.

Here’s a woman decked with pearls,
As with stars the midnight sky,
Clad in smooth and warm excess
And soft superfluity.

Here’s another, hung with rags
As with weeds of snaky motion,
That clasp some moldering palace wall
On a deserted shore; or crawl
Idly on the ocean.

Here’s a thing that’s half a saint,
Half a soldier, all a monarch,
Weighing down a people’s life,
Yet a most embodied anarch.

Like a bloodhound lean and fierce
He gnaws Europe; yet his curship
Talks of God in every act,
And blasphemes Him by such worship.

Here’s a lord with Sunday club,
Bright and light to lounge and lurch in,
Closing up the wayside shop
Where the poor man used to stop
To drink his beer and eat his lunch in.

Doth thou see this man? The morning
Of his life was hard, stern work,
And the evening closes round him
Desolate and bare and dark.

All the toil and sore endeavor—
The sharp fight fought every day
Leaves him still the same grim foeman
Now that he is old and gray.

Seest this other man? Birds dancing
In the heavenward breath of spring,
Perfumed flowers in sheltered gardens,
Brooks that leap and laugh and sing.

Butterflies within the sunshine,
Living in one smile of fate,
Knowing but the world’s adorning,
Are the symbols of his state.

Let both mingle with the masquers
And dance on. These sharp extremes
Are the miserable nightmares
That sic our waking dreams.

Ghastly is the dance of death,
Ghastlier the dance of being—
A masque fantastical and strange
To the hearing and the seeing.

But the earth is slowly ripening,
Like a great fruit in the sun,
And will learn some better dancing
Ere the centuries are done.

THE POOR, POORER?

Copy linkEdit

I have been working out a puzzle. It is not one performed with blocks, or rings, or strings, or figures. It is solved in the mind alone—when solved at all. It has baffled many good, earnest people. It is started by a question, and until a satisfactory answer is reached, one is haunted by it. The question is, Are the poor growing 110?

There you are, plunged right into the intricacies of the puzzle. You are recalling your own experience. You are thinking of the sermons you have heard on the topic. You are trying in vain to reconcile the Atkinsonian statistics. You are weighing some of the countless assertions that people have made in your presence in reply to that question.

Now, I want to bring you gradually to the point at which the debate rested with me. When we say “the poor,” we do not refer to the poor Indian or any poor savage. Neither do we mean the poor Hindoo, the poor Chinaman, nor the poor Russian. You did not mean any of these, did you? No, nor very likely the peasantry of Italy, or Spain, or South America, or, to come nearer our range of personal acquaintance, of Ireland. Eliminate these poor from the problem, and there are, comparatively, not many poor left. Say only those in England, France and Germany. In those countries the cities are growing rapidly, much as they are in America, though France keeps a larger proportion of her population in the rural districts than do the rest of us. If we glance at a few statistical tables relating to the laboring classes of England, France and Germany, we are apt to wonder how the poor get along over there at all, and we see that it will require a great change to make any noticeable improvement in their condition. They cannot have grown very much better off, for there is only the shadow of a line between large masses of them and pauperism.

And so we are brought home to America to work out our puzzle here.

I suppose you have gone all through the mill on this question. I dare say you have consumed all the facts that could be imparted to you by the daily newspapers, the

p. 7, col. 2 magazines and the solid tomes of the libraries. At one time you were convinced that the poor were not so badly off as they were a quarter of a century ago—and you happened to walk through a crowded quarter of the city and the appalling evidences of poverty there staggered your belief. Hence you failed to detect the first streaks of the millennial sun in the eastern sky. At another time your newspaper contained the quarterly mortality tables, and you saw that the poor, and especially the children of the poor, were dying off like flies in early frost time, and you were about forming the opinion that the lot of the poor of this country was never more dreadful—when you were recalled to a happier frame of mind by seeing a washerwoman in a silk dress.

A silk dress! That brings up the sermons. How they are cast in one mold! The poor nowadays enjoy what kings in the old days could not—and all that. Then the enumeration of the things of luxury that the poor have now occasionally and that the kings could not have had because these modern fine things existed not in their day. Did Prince Hal have a locomotive? Never. Did Henry VIII have a pipe of tobacco, a lucifer match, a Waterbury watch, or a chromo? He had none of these. Yet the poorest of our poor enjoy them all. Our poor are richer than were the old-time kings!

Well, fellow sufferer, I, too, have imbibed all the benefit I could from the sermonizers, the editorial builders, the figure paraders, and still I have been asking myself, Are the poor growing poorer? Accident lately threw a flood of satisfying light on the subject for me.

I was seated in the office of a coal yard down near the river front, chatting with the bookkeeper. The topic was, “Are the poor growing poorer?” The bookkeeper believed they were not. I was taking the other side of the argument, either because he was so positive in his opinion, or because the facts latest coming to my observation had acted on my mind like the varying wind on a weather vane, and had directed my attention to the extreme poverty of the many.

The office door leading to the coal yard was open, and on the steps sat a dirty, ragged fellow. Unknown to us he was listening to our talk. Presently, when a lull occurred in the conversation, he looked in on us. I saw he was a hard-faced, middle-aged tramp. The expression of his face was at once humorous, careless and defiant. I glanced at the bookkeeper and saw he was in a mood to tolerate the vagrant’s talk, since something we had said related to his class. The tramp saw it, too, and began a monologue, which he was allowed to proceed with. I shall not attempt to reproduce in type his thieves’ lingo. His manner showed the outcast. He began by assuring me that I was “dead wrong.” He would prove it.

He had two professions. In summer he was a tramp; in winter a pauper. He had sworn off hard work thirty years ago. He was English. The best friend he ever had was a tramp who had been thirty years on the road when he himself began the practice of his professions in England. So he was familiar with tramp life for a period of sixty years. And to hear now that the poor were growing poorer!

Why, sixty years ago tramps in England were liable to arrest for doing nothing but tramping, and the prisons were horrible. He had come to this country before the war, and there were mighty few tramps in America then. During the war everybody had money, of course, and he made some himself bounty jumping. But it all went soon. What did he want with money? All his relatives were low down social outcasts, and he felt that he never could get above them. They were bound to find him out and pull him down if he happened to grow respectable. They did not have the foolish pride that some poor people possess, those that work and starve themselves to death trying to be called honest and thinking they did great things in holding themselves above begging. His family never had notions of that kind. When he landed, a stowaway, at New York, long years ago, he found hardly any people who shared his views about shifting along without work. What a fine time he had! Begging was easy, for folks thought it such a pity that an able-bodied young fellow like him should have to beg his way to find work, as he used to say he was doing, and they would often give him food and money. But of late years tramps seemed to be growing right out of the ground, and it cost more effort to get a crust at a basement door of a cook or waitress than it once did to pull a dollar out of a kindly-disposed gentleman’s pocketbook. Tramps were so numerous now in New York that the parks were filled with them. Just for fun, one day he counted the idlers hanging around the Battery pretending they wanted work, and there were nearly three hundred of them. Lots of men were finding out that a fellow could live as a tramp until he died. That’s about all the fellows who work can do—live until they die. Astor only got his board and clothes, you know.

Well, but about the poor growing poorer. He was “dead sure” they were not. He was certain the poor had many things now that they did not have thirty years ago. Now, look here. He was a consistent representative of the poorest class. He had nothing, not even a character. Even the clothes on his back he had begged or “swiped.” Now, he ought to know, by personal observation, whether he was poorer than he was thirty years ago. He wasn’t a bit. He could enjoy more, see more, travel easier and partake of the benefits of civilization as would have been absolutely impossible for him when he came to America. Now, take traveling, for example. Thirty years ago he would have been obliged to “leg it” in many parts of the country where he could now hang onto a brake beam and make quick time. It would have been impossible then for him to visit California, but he had been there twice in the last five years. He could make San Francisco in from two to three weeks from New York, stealing rides on railroad trains. How was that for growing poorer? Then newspapers. They are cheap, and people throw away a great many. He never bought a newspaper in his life, but he would bet he

p. 7, col. 3 knew everything that was going on. And household goods. Why, he could remember when the tableware in the almshouses and jails were made of wood. Now they were made of stoneware. sic the knives and forks were of better material. These residences of his class were comfortably heated now with steam; in old times one big wood stove was expected to heat a whole jail. There were more counties now in every state than there were thirty years ago, and all of them had prisons and poor houses. The paupers had more and better accommodations. He had traveled through the south, and had seen how the colored people lived. They did not as a class have the conveniences of life that the northern pauper enjoyed. But when they were slaves they had not owned even themselves; now they had an opportunity to save whatever they could after paying their rent. Look out west. There were many out there who had grown from poverty to wealth. Of course, though, the chances for everybody doing well were less than they used to be, but that must be expected as a country settles up, and some get rich enough to own the farms and the town lots. But if any one wanted to be convinced that the poor were not growing poorer, let him look at any factory town. See the fine clothes both the men and women wear. Did that not prove that the poor were growing better off? Those fine clothes could not have been worn by any but the rich fifty years ago. It was just like the steam heat in jails and the quick traveling of the tramps. Everybody gets some share of improvement in the arts. These factory people, of course, lost time by suspensions of work on account of overproduction and strikes and lockouts. sic they could not aspire to self-employment or think of changing their employment, but they had in their houses what their grandfathers never 111, dollar newspapers, Bayside sic, cheap silk dresses, chinaware and carpets. See what chances there were to “tramp it” when work was slack! Factory people all expected to be seeking for work from place to place sooner or later, and instead of walking they could journey by rail for nothing, as tramps do. Another thing, factory people and others like them, employed irregularly and nowhere permanently, incurred no expenses in maintaining homes for themselves. So they were enabled to buy good clothes.

Our tramp wound up his curious talk by declaring that he lived in the city because he could enjoy more things here than could the hard working men in the country. Poor as he was he was better off than the lonely farmer who hoed his own acres.

As I have said, I have had light enough given me in response to the question, Are the poor growing poorer? The tramp gave it to me.

An Open Letter to Professor David Swing.

W. H. Van Ornum of Ravenswood, Ill., has addressed a letter to Professor David 112 of Chicago in answer to his recent sermon on “Henry George’s Dream.” Space forbids the publication of more than one or two points:

“You lay great stress upon the fact that in the two ‘streams of eloquence’ under consideration neither Dr. McGlynn nor Mr. Pentecost ‘make any approach toward explaining the free landism of their chieftain, Henry George; nor did either intimate in any manner how the poor could all be made comfortable by any new plan.’ These explanations have been made so often and so distinctly that there remains not the slightest excuse for any man who lays claim to being at all well informed to plead ignorance; nor in the speeches of Rev. Dr. McGlynn or Mr. Pentecost can one fail to get a clear idea of what free land means or how it is to be obtained. Its necessary effect upon the masses of poor people who are now shut out from participation in God’s bounties is also clearly pointed out. There is nowhere the least reservation or evasion, a fact which you ought to know if you do not. We might with as much reason expect you to explain fully the plan of salvation in every sermon you preach, as for you to cavil at them for not fully and exhaustively explaining the remedy in addresses intended to awaken the hearts and consciences of men to this great injustice. . . . But the most surprising statement is the one that ‘it would be a matter of great joy for many of our millionaires if all taxes should be exacted from land investments.’ Perhaps that is the reason so many of our millionaires are so enthusiastically supporting Henry George!”

When Mr. Warder Retires Will He Talk About How He Worked for His Money?

Springfield, Ohio, Republic.

Mr. B. H. Warder of this city spent the winter in Washington and while there has been amusing himself with buying and selling real estate. He has had wonderful success, and it is said that the crowd of speculators at the capital watch his investments closely and buy as near where he buys as possible. When Mr. Warder buys a piece of property owners of adjacent property immediately advance the price so that his profit is assured. The following special gives an account of Mr. Warder’s success. It is clipped from a Philadelphia paper and his address is given as Chicago instead of Springfield:

“Capitalists from all sections of the country continue to flock to Washington, apparently holding real estate investments in that city in higher esteem than those of other eastern towns, so says the Philadelphia Times. Next to Senator Don Cameron, who is said to have added $250,000 to his vast fortune by shrewd purchases here, B. H. Warder of Chicago is understood to have made the most out of recent deals. Unlike Senator Cameron, Mr. Warder does not buy for the purpose of holding his purchases for any considerable time. His rule is to sell quickly, always at a profit, of course, but never to wait for enormous gains. Less than a year ago he bought a tract of land on Sixteenth street at $1.50 per foot, which he held for a short time and then disposed of it at an advance of fifty cents. The same property has been sold three times since, and the estimate is that in a year more it will be held at $5 a foot.”

It’s a Very Simple Question.

Horse Collar Makers’ Journal.

The question requires no complex reasoning; in its entirety it is simplicity itself. So simple is it that the natural instinct of the most ignorant man that ever existed (providing that his reason was not impaired) would easily lead him to a correct understanding of the fundamental principles of this most pertinent of all questions. It is, in brief: Are the whole people of the world equally entitled to a footing upon it, or are some people specially blessed with privileges not enjoyed by the rest of humanity?

The Bodyke Tenants.

Correspondence Mail and Express.

In the case of forty-nine of these 113 tenants, so far as I could ascertain, the government valuation of their holdings was £630; the rent in 1850 amounted to £595; when the present agitation broke out, these had been “racked up” on the tenants’ own improvements and the supposed rise in the value of land to £1,224, which was reduced by the land court to £[808?].

p. 7, col. 4

LAND AND LABOR.

Copy linkEdit

The following are extracts from correspondence received by Secretary Barnes at 28 Cooper union:

Lockport, N. Y.—Dr. McGlynn’s lecture has done a world of good here. It has stopped the cry of “anarchy,” etc. Several of our most intelligent citizens have said since the lecture that they do not know but the single 114 is right. On our side will be found true religion, morality, intelligence, charity, justice, philanthropy; arrayed against us only selfishness, avarice and ignorance. The old racial feuds must be blotted out, and this can only be done by preaching the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of men.

Buffalo, N. Y.—Dr. McGlynn had an audience here of earnest, thoughtful faces, old men and young, maids and matrons, and every seat filled, and the aisles as far as was permitted. Scores could not get near the doors and were turned away; all this in as orderly a manner as any church gathering. The doctor spoke two hours and a half and many remained standing the entire time. We find a growing sentiment here against the clumsy demagogy of the Tammany politicians at the O’Brien meeting. Think of a paper calling itself the organ of labor (Buffalo Truth) heading a five-line notice of Dr. McGlynn as “The Priestly Politician.” No wonder people distrust the “professional” labor reformers of this city.

F. W. Morgan, Troy, N. Y.—Land and labor club No. 19 has elected the following officers: President, H. C. Romaine; vice-president, A. J. Nugent; financial secretary, James Chambers; treasurer, George L. Storer, with myself as recording secretary.

John Daly, secretary land and labor club, Iron Mountain, Mich.—It is astonishing the amount of attention that is paid in this place to the doctrines advocated by our organization, and the secret of it is that we don’t need to dwell very long on the theoretical part of it, because it is so easy to deal with it in the practical way. We have only to point out of our window and ask who they are that own this land of the upper peninsula, and the answer is plain: the great corporations, not the hardy pioneers who, by their skill and endurance have opened the resources of the country. This is the hot-bed of monopoly, the paradise of land pirates, and real estate men speak about it in veneration. This county is labor in politics from dog catcher to legislator.

F. M. Crosby, Wakefield, Mass.—Our club has elected the following officers: President, George B. Sinclair; vice-president, J. N. Ryder; financial secretary, J. S. Cooper; treasurer, S. H. Higgins; recording and corresponding secretary, myself.

Bernard W. Doyle, register of deeds, Milwaukee, Wis.—The central committee of the labor party have now definitely arranged for Dr. McGlynn to deliver his address at the great picnic on the Fourth of July. He can then speak at Racine on the 5th, and we have engaged one of the largest halls here for the evening of the 6th, and expect to pack it with people from parquet to dome.

C. H. Fuller, Middletown, N. Y.—There was an excellent audience to hear Dr. McGlynn here, and on the day following hundreds regretted the fact that they also had not attended. The lecture created a profound impression.

D. L. Munro, Altoona, Pa.—Not 200 yards from where I sit writing this, in what is known as the valley of Altoona, Pa., eastern side, is a block of unimproved vacant land—enough to make happy homes for fifty families, made valuable not by reason of anything the holder has done, but by reason of its proximity to the center of business. Although building lots are much sought after, yet the occupant of this block will not dispose of any part of it. Here is a property which blocks development of the city. Should not this and land alike situated be more heavily taxed to choke off such and all similar dogs in the manger? Those who give opposition advance no sufficient reason for doing so, but simply that it partakes of “socialism.” It strikes me as novel to hear such parties prate of robbery and religion. The movement has many friends and cannot be set aside. The picnic here on the Fourth of July under the auspices of the K. of L. promises to be a big demonstration. Orators from New York, Richmond, Va., and Hollidaysburg, Pa., have been secured.

—— —— —. We attended the conference at Elmira last week, with the result that we are dissatisfied with its leaders. We do not believe they are honest in their undertaking. For this reason we come to the united labor party, believing that the land doctrine is the one to follow. I shall from this forward do all I can to advance the interests of the united labor party of New York.

Finlay A. Grant, Merricourt, Dak.—The dearth of settlers here is not due to the fact that unimproved land is sic, or that land seekers are few. There is land in plenty, and intending settlers come daily, but pass further on, for, though not a tenth of the land is improved, it is all owned—held for speculation, of course. It is hard, in a disfranchised region like this, to brook the thought of waiting for a share in the fight until the battle has been half won. I am now doing for land reform all that my time and opportunity will permit.

W. H. Ryan, Louisville, Ky.—There are a number here who are friends of the movement, but who hesitate publicly to proclaim the fact lest by so doing they should be injured in business. You are doing a grand work in New York, and THE STANDARD is doing grand work all over the country. We need more STANDARDS. We can only have one George and one McGlynn. Shearman’s essay on “The Single Tax” is a home 115.

Dr. T. M. Crowe, Buffalo, N. Y.—The O’Brien incident is an event portending the absolute destruction of landlordism and proclaiming with powerful effectiveness the principles of equity and justice. Coming events cast their shadow before. That the event in this case will be greater than its shadow is already apparent.

Auburn, N. Y.—Dr. McGlynn’s lecture accomplished more than the most sanguine could have hoped for. People who have hitherto been bitterly opposed both to the doctor and to Mr. George are now willing to be classed as disciples of both.

John J. Kelleher, Boston, Mass.—We are now thoroughly organized, with president, A. Sarbutt; treasurer, T. Collins, and myself as secretary, and we have very spirited discussions on land reform every night.

William H. Coughlin, Gloversville, N. Y.—Our club organized on Friday, June 3, and our membership is increasing rapidly in this stronghold of the grand old party. We have now forty members on the roll.

John H. McCormick, Tampa, Fla.—Our land and labor club here is organized with thirty members on the roll and officers elected. We have distributed several thousand tracts and have some good men reading THE STANDARD.

Gloversville, N. Y.—This town, containing the villages of Gloversville and Johnstown, with 20,000 people, nearly all wage earners, is the very place where the land and labor doctrines should get a strong hold. Some of our people have heard Mr. Redpath and would like to have him come here and give us a lecture.

William E. Morgan, Syracuse, N. Y.—Dr. McGlynn’s lecture is the principal topic in

p. 7, col. 5 the city to-day. He sounded an alarm, the echo of which has reverberated into the homes and workshops of the people in this vicinity.

W. W. Bailey, state organizer of Indiana, writes: H. Martin Williams, the gifted Missouri orator, was here in Vincennes recently under the auspices of land and labor club No. 3, and had a large, intelligent audience. Some who came to scoff remained to pray, and such was the general effect of his speech that if he were to come again he would draw a very much larger audience.

Preparations are being made by the local club to organize the country, which will be done just as soon as harvest is over. I am satisfied that the sentiment here is rapidly changing in our favor. Everybody is giving more or less thought to the question.

Vincennes will send a good delegation to the Fourth of July conference and celebration at Cincinnati, where Henry George is to speak.

The demand for THE STANDARD is steadily growing.

Organizing in Philadelphia.

PHILADELPHIA, June 30.—The Nineteenth ward land and labor club was formed last evening in the hall of the Textile workers progressive union, 2418 North Front street. Isaac B. Miller was chosen president; Joseph Lawson, vice-president; John Key, secretary, and Edward McNulty, treasurer. Meetings will be held at the same place every Wednesday evening. This is the first ward organization of the party in this city, and starts under encouraging auspices. The Henry George club is taking an active interest in the movement.

J. H. M.

Work in Minneapolis.

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn., June 27.—Our city has been quietly organizing. We have seven out of the thirteen wards organized, with one more to be added this week. Our progress is steady and the whole movement harmonious. Our greatest lack has been a few good, popular speakers. We hold a big picnic on the Fourth, at which the “land question” will be the theme for orations. At a meeting held on Sunday afternoon it was unanimously decided to organize an anti-poverty society. THE STANDARD is doing good work here.

A. DOLLENMAYER.

TAMPA, Fla.—We have organized a Henry George land and labor club here. The following officers have been elected: F. M. Myers, president; W. A. McArthur, M. D. first vice-president; S. M. Loomer, second vice-president; John H. McCormick, secretary; G. W. Carter, treasurer.

We are going to work with our sleeves rolled up, and in a few months we will, I hope, have a few hundred members. The night we organized some thirty signed their names on our books. We have a splendid field to work in, and we expect to make good use of our time. We shall endeavor to put as many copies of THE STANDARD in circulation as we can, as we believe it is doing a good work wherever read. God speed Dr. McGlynn and Henry sic and the Rev. Hugh Pentecost. They are are sic a grand and noble work. Would to God we had thousands of such men and less Corrigans, Hewitts, Goulds, and such stock, then this world would be better off. Corrigan cannot stem the tide of public opinion that is rising in his church, and the sooner he learns this the better for the Catholic church.

JOHN H. MCCORMICK.

This Sort of Thing Passes ’for sic With the Pro-Poverty Press.

New York Sun.

We suppose that Mr. Henry George would willingly confess that the last two months of his life have been the happiest he has ever experienced. He has started a paper of which he is the sole proprietor, and its weekly balance sheet, we believe, shows a comfortable sum to his credit.

Yet his satisfaction over the week’s work cannot be half so intense as the pleasure which he gets every Sunday evening at the meeting of the Anti-poverty society in the Academy of Music. That is the culminating moment of the week in Mr. George’s happiness and might well fill the heart of any man with a glow of pleasure. He then appears as the idol of a band of enthusiastic and emotional philosophers, and it is not too much to say that they regard him as the first of living men. He is the pioneer, if not the inventor, of a system of taxation which they hope will relieve the human race of all the economic ills with which it struggles.

But on Sunday night last Mr. George said that one thing gave him even greater pleasure than the demonstration for which his weekly entrance on the Academy stage was always the signal. This was the applause bestowed upon Dr. McGlynn. “This week,” said Mr. George, “Dr. McGlynn is to be excommunicated.”

The crowning triumph of the editor of THE STANDARD’S brief career as a political and economic agitator in this city is this fact of excommunication.

Mr. George’s effort to put all taxes on land is no nearer to success than it was when he ran for mayor. But upon the issue raised between him and the Roman Catholic church he has unquestionably come out ahead. It has been like a contest for the possession of a priest. Should he cleave to his church or to Mr. George? He has chosen George. No wonder that the latter was gratified by the excommunication. It was the proof of his own victory, whatever effect it may eventually have upon the priest.

Anti-Poverty Societies of One.

The Kansas City Star recently published this interview with a prominent real estate speculator:

About three months ago we received from a party in Worcester, Mass., $10,000 to invest in Kansas City real estate, which we did in that delightful suburb of Argentine, which at that time was comparatively quiet and uninteresting, the “boom” not having yet struck there. We went in with him and bought an eighty-acre piece at $500 per acre, one-half cash. Since that time the Burton stock car company, the Meigs elevated road and various other smaller manufactories have located there, and in just six weeks we sold those eighty acres at $1,500 an acre, clearing just $80,000 on the deal. Of course this made him feel pretty good, and he came again, bringing some money with him that belonged to a young widow of his town, and we invested it for them at Argentine, in several pieces of acre property; this time at much higher figures than at first paid, and in some instances was obliged to go in with them to give them confidence. Well, during the past ten days we have sold them out clear and clean of everything, at a net profit of $425,000, part of which they desire to invest again at Argentine this week or next.

NEW PUBLICATIONS.

[Advertisement] Henry George’s Solution of the Labor Problem

Copy linkEdit

HENRY GEORGE’S SOLUTION

OF THE LABOR PROBLEM.

WHY I PREACHED ON IT.

by

HUGH O. PENTECOST,

Minister to the Belleville Avenue Congregational Church in Newark, N. J.

A sixteen-page pamphlet. Price 5 cents.

Sent by mail on receipt of price. Address as above.

[Advertisement] The Phonographic Magazine

Copy linkEdit

THE PHONOGRAPHIC MAGAZINE.

JEROME B. HOWARD, Editor.

A 24 page monthly. The authentic exponent of the Benn Pitman System of Phonography. $1.50 per annum. Specimen copy free. The Phonographic Institute, Cincinnati, O.

p. 7, col. 6

NEW PUBLICATIONS.

[Advertisement] Henry George’s New Book, Protection or Free Trade?

Copy linkEdit

HENRY GEORGE’S NEW BOOK,

PROTECTION OR FREE TRADE?

AN EXAMINATION OF THE TARIFF QUESTION WITH ESPECIAL REGARD TO THE INTERESTS OF LABOR.

[ornament]

12mo. Cloth. Price, $1.50.

(From sic.,

[Remainder of this advertisement (the extract from George’s preface) not transcribed: see scan. — transcriber]

OTHER WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.

Progress and Poverty, 12mo. cloth……………… $1.00
” ” paper……………… .20
Social Problems, 12mo. cloth……………… 1.00
” ” paper……………… .20
Property in Land, paper……………… .15
The Land Question, paper……………… .10

For sale by all booksellers, or sent postpaid on receipt of price.

HENRY GEORGE & CO., 25 Ann street, New York.

[Advertisement] The Land and Labor Library

Copy linkEdit

THE LAND AND LABOR LIBRARY.—

We are now publishing under the title of “The Land and Labor Library” a series of short tracts on various phases of the social problem. These pamphlets contain facts, figures and arguments expressed in concise, vigorous language easily understood. As a means of propaganda we recommend them to all who desire to help on the movement for social reform. Those who wish to have these tracts placed where they will do good but who are unable personally to attend to their distribution, can remit the price to us, as we have every facility for sending them where they are needed and will be read.

The following have already appeared:

No. 1. “First Principles.” By Henry George. 4 pages. No. 2. “Land and Taxation.” A conversation between David Dudley Field and Henry George. 4 pages. No. 3. “The Right to the Use of the Earth.” By Herbert Spencer. 4 pages. No. 4. “A Christian Minister on the Remedy for Poverty.” A sermon by the Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost of Newark, N. J. 2 pages. No. 5. “A Sum in Proportion.” By T. L. McCready. 2 pages. No. 6. “The Settler’s Nightmare.” By Louis F. Post. 4 pages. No. 7. “New York’s Docks: The True Mode of Raising Revenue.” By. J. W. sic. 4 pages. No. 8. “Unemployed Labor.” By Henry George. 4 pages. No. 9. “Voices for Reform.” 2 pages. No. 10. “A Mysterious Disappearance.” By Lewis Freeland. 6 pages. No. 11. “How to Increase Profits.” By A. J. Steers. 2 pages. No. 12. “The American Farmer.” By Henry George. 4 pages. No. 13. “Sailors’ Snug Harbor and the Randall Farm.” By W. T. Croasdale. 12 pages. No. 14. “The Collegiate Church and the Shoemaker’s Field.” By W. T. Croasdale. 12 pages. No. 15. “Only a Dream.” By Abner C. Thomas. 4 pages. No. 16. “The Anti-Poverty Society.” Dr. McGlynn’s address at the first meeting. 8 pages. No. 17. “The Cross of the New Crusade.” A poem. By David Rorty. 2 pages. No. 18. “It is the Law of Christ.” By Rev. S. H. Spencer of Henry, Ill. 4 pages. No. 19. “My Landlord. By John sic. 4 pages. No. 20.”Thou Shalt Not Steal.” An address by Henry George before the Anti-Poverty Society. 8 pages. No. 21. “Christianity and Poverty.” An address by Father Huntington before the 116 society. 4 pages. No. 22. “Poverty and Christianity.” An address by Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost before the Anti-poverty society. 8 pages. No. 23. “The Single Tax.” By Thomas G. Shearman. 8 pages. No. 24. “Hymns of the New Crusade”—No. 1. 4 pages. No. 25. “Hymns of the New Crusade”—No. 2. 4 pages. No. 26. “Religion vs. Robbery.” Address by Rev. Dr. McGlynn before the New York Anti-poverty society, June 12, 1887. 8 pages. No. 27. “Back to the Land.” Bishop Nulty’s letter to the clergy and laity of his diocese. 16 pages. Price, 5 cents. No. 28. “Anti-Slavery and Anti-Poverty.” An address by the Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost before the New York Anti-Poverty Society, June 19. 8 pages.

Prices, free by mail: 2-page tracts—[50?] copies, 10 cents; 100 copies, 15 cents; 1,000 copies, $1; 5,000 copies, $4.25. Four-page tracts—25 copies, 10 cents; 100 copies, 25 cents; 1,000 copies, $2; 5,000 copies, $8.50. Six-page tracts—25 copies, 15 cents; 100 copies, 37 cents; 1,000 copies, $3; 5,000 copies, $12.75. Eight-page tracts—25 copies, 20 cents; 100 copies 50 cents; 1,000 copies, $4; 5,000 copies, $17. Ten-page tracts—25 copies, 30 cents; 100 copies, 75 cents; 1,000 copies, $6; 5,000 copies, $25.50.

Other numbers in preparation.

Address HENRY GEORGE,
25 Ann st., New York City.

[Advertisement] German Edition of “Progress and Poverty”

Copy linkEdit

GERMAN EDITION OF “PROGRESS AND POVERTY.”

FORTSCHRITT UND ARMUTH.

Von HENRY GEORGE.

Price $2.00.

Address F. GUTSCHOW,
812 California street, San Francisco, Cal.

[Advertisement] Just Out. An Account of the George-Hewitt Campaign

Copy linkEdit

JUST OUT.

AN ACCOUNT OF THE GEORGE-HEWITT CAMPAIGN.

By Louis F. Post and Fred. C. Leubuscher.

1 vol., paper covers. Price, 20 cents.

Address HENRY GEORGE & CO.,
25 Ann street, New York.

[Advertisement] Tax Reformer

Copy linkEdit

TAX REFORMER.

The first paper published in America devoted to the advocacy of the principles of “Progress and Poverty.”

Subscription, one year, with a copy of “Progress and Poverty,” given free, 50 cents; with “Progress and Poverty” and “Social Problems,” 75 cents.

M. BATTLE, 9 Spruce street,
New York.

[Advertisement] Natural Rights, Natural Liberty and Natural Law

Copy linkEdit

NATURAL RIGHTS, NATURAL LIBERTY and NATURAL LAW. An Inquiry into the causes of social maladjustments. The rational, just and adequate remedy,” is what its title sic and should be read by everyone. Price, postage prepaid, single copy 15 cents; in quantities of 100 copies and upward 10 cents per copy. Address, F. Q. STUART, Symes Block, Denver, Colo.

Page 8 of 8contents

8 THE STANDARD, SATURDAY JULY 9, 1887.

p. 8, col. 1

PUBLISHER’S NOTES.

Copy linkEdit

How goes the war? Are we gaining on the enemy or are we losing ground? Through the press and turmoil of this glorious battle for human rights, through the heat and dust and clashing of this continental struggle for freedom, is the anti-poverty banner advancing, and are the anti-poverty hosts pressing harder and yet harder on their 117?

Yes, friends, the banner is advancing—the hosts of truth are gaining ground. We have forced the outposts of the enemy; we have compelled them to muster their battalions, to form their forces into line, to summon all their energies to withstand the onset that they see is surely coming before long. See how their cohorts are gathering. Every misrepresentation of our objects, every insinuated slander upon our leaders, every depreciation of our strength, is a sure and certain sign that the supporters of monopoly and greed and poverty are bracing themselves for a life and death struggle with our advancing army. Pick up any journal, religious, secular or comic, no matter where published, and in its pages you will surely find some reference to the anti-poverty crusade—a sneer, a jest, a labored argument, a studied falsehood, an advocacy of some other remedy than ours. Read the utterances of men in public life—their Fourth of July orations, their after-dinner speeches—and see how few of them are able to avoid a little fling at anti-poverty. The preachers are discussing the matter, the college forums are debating it, the little children talk about it.

There is no mistaking these signs of the times. The anti-poverty cause is gaining. The pro-poverty folks are scared.

And now, you readers of THE STANDARD, you men and women—aye, and children, too,—whose hearts are glad within you as you see these signs of progress, and who long with all your souls for the coming of that thrice-blessed day when poverty shall be plucked up by the roots and the last vestige of it destroyed forevermore, remember that the very things that make you hopeful should spur you on to fresh endeavors. When the pro-poverty bugles are sounding all along the line, and the pro-poverty hosts are waking from their fancied security and mustering from every direction, is no time for you to be sitting idly in your tents! Up and be doing! Let the stern shout of your defiance answer the sneers and falsehoods of your foes. You love your cause; you long with all your souls for its triumph. Let your love and longing find expression in your deeds. To work! To work! To work!

Our cause wants men. Truth we have on our side; but truth without men to voice it and enforce it is like land without labor. This battle must be decided by votes; and every ballot counts just one on either side. To get these votes—to persuade men to see the truth—is the task before us. It’s a very simple one, a very easy one, if only we go at it with our whole hearts. And take this thought along with you, you men and women who read these lines, that if every one of us would go earnestly to work to spread this anti-poverty gospel, our cause would triumph within two years or less. Think of that, and then stand idle if you dare! Go out among your friends and talk the truth to them with all the earnestness and fire of men who really believe. Get them to take THE STANDARD—don’t merely ask them to take it and go off with “no” for an answer; but read it to them; force them to see that it’s a live paper, discussing a question that must be considered; make them know that you really want their subscriptions, that you really mean to have them, and you’ll get them, sure.

BUFFALO, N. Y.—I have quite a number of friends in various parts of the country, chiefly in the western states and territories, whom I want to bring into the anti-poverty army. I don’t know any better way to do it than by sending them THE STANDARD; but I really am not able to send a three months’ subscription for each one of them. Can you do anything to help me? I am sure that if they got the paper for just a few weeks they would understand the matter and become subscribers.

ELIZABETH F. B——.

We have received several letters of this sort lately, and have done a heap of thinking over them. And the outcome of our thinking is a system of “recruit subscriptions” which will enable STANDARD readers to do efficient work upon their friends at a distance, or upon persons whom they don’t know personally, but want to see brought into the fold nevertheless. We will send THE STANDARD for six weeks

To any two addresses for fifty cents.

To any five addresses for $1.

To any twelve addresses for $2.

Now, friends, here’s a fresh chance for you. There’s mighty little doubt that any man who reads THE STANDARD for six weeks will at least get to thinking hard enough to induce him to subscribe for the paper, even if he doesn’t become an out and out convert; and if each one of you will send us only two of these subscriptions, we can gather in recruits by the hundred. What do you say? A car fare saved now and again, a few pennies put by when you can spare them, will soon enable you to give six weeks of THE STANDARD to at least two people of the many who need it. See to it that the clergymen in your neighborhood get the benefit of these recruit subscriptions. They are the most valuable allies we can have; and when they do see the truth, they labor for the cause with an energy, and a fearlessness, and a self-devotion worthy of all praise. Look out for the farmers, too; they need a course of STANDARDS badly to disabuse their minds of the pro-poverty press slanders. Your storekeepers, too, also want looking after; your school teachers are good folks to work on; mechanics, laborers, who is there who can read and think to whom THE STANDARD cannot point the way of hope? Go for them all, good friends, and do it soon, that they, in turn, may carry the tidings on to others.

And now for a look into our mail bag. If we gave up the whole STANDARD to “Publisher’s Notes” we shouldn’t have room for half the letters that ought to be published, but here are some of them:

LOS ANGELES, Cal.—Inclosed is money order of $18 for three subscriptions to THE STANDARD and the balance for 6,000 tracts for the land and labor club of this city. Clubs are now being organized in Pasadena, Monrovia, Colton, Sierra Madre, Santa Barbara, Long Beach and Riverside. The real estate boom still continues. Fabulous profits are being realized from the increase of land values, and professional gamblers are quitting sic and faro” to take a hand in “lots.” Louisiana lottery is at a discount and “thimble rigging” has lost its charms. Church societies have adopted this simple and effective method of “raising the wind,” and the city of angels bids fair to rival Brooklyn in the number of her spires. Every day we are treated to an auction sale of lots, with brass band and free lunch accompaniments, and the erstwhile stock craze over Gould and Curry and Consolidated Virginia is totally eclipsed. The fair sex take a hand in the game, and our local sic” has resolved itself into a co-operative land speculation society. The latest phase which the boom has assumed is an auction sale of Los Angeles property, held in San Francisco on the 19th inst. Twenty-five thousand dollars’ worth of lots were sold in a few hours.

There are about one hundred boomlets of more or less magnitude throughout the country, all of which are rival claimants to the best water, the best climate and the best society. Inasmuch as the climate is an essential

p. 8, col. 2 item of valuation, it may truthfully be said of us that we are “selling the air.” The moral tone of the community, however, is maintained by occasional raids on a faro 118119?120? or the Chinese “fan tan” games. The players put up $10 bail for their appearance in court, which event never occurs, and thus “society is saved.” The country is swarming with tramps, and these are of two species. One is the tramp sic, the “brake-beam” immigrant, with a penchant for stale beer and haylofts. He has discovered that a multitude of people are traveling to the pearly gates on the “charity route,” and concluded to discard work and levy “baksheesh” on the pilgrim. The other goes “begging for work.” He has no capital to gamble at “land faro,” and he finds climate a very thin diet to subsist on. He has reached the jumping off place on his western journey, and he wanders about looking for the benevolent master who will give him “employment.” He is “for sale” on the auction block, but there has been seemingly an over production of the merchandise and he is “not wanted.”

In the midst of these anomalies of nature we have planted the “Cross of the New Crusade,” never to be uprooted, and we earnestly hope that the day is not far distant when the fraternity of mankind will be recognized in its fullest sense.

A. VINETTE,

Deputy organizer for southern California.

NEW YORK CITY.—On Sunday evening, June 19, I attended the meeting of the Anti-poverty society, faintly interested, but somewhat skeptical as to the practicability of such an organization. But under the calm, dispassionate utterances of Dr. McGlynn, the magnetic eloquence of Mr. Pentecost, and the terse, merciless, crushing logic of Henry George, I surrendered, and enrolled myself as a member in the glorious society. And now I am heart and soul in the cause. sic feel an intense longing to do something, however humble, to advance it. And I venture to suggest that a great deal of good could be done, and a vast number of recruits added to the ranks by members going personally among their friends, acquaintances and neighbors and setting forth the gospel and aims of the society in such a manner as personal knowledge may suggest to be the most effective. We must wake up and work if we would have this movement succeed. Every member ought to feel that upon his individual and unceasing efforts depends the success of the undertaking.

HENRY C. POWER.

RIDGEWOOD, N. J.—Your book, “Progress and sic,” has cleared all the fogs from the labor question. I am with you heart and soul. I have begun the sic, and am going to carry it into Africa. There are several I have made uncomfortable and set to thinking, as the questions they put to me show. If there is anything I can do, I am ready.

E. B. CRANE.

NEW ORLEANS.—Inclosed please find $10, which you will please apply as you deem best. It does not belong to me. I found it about two months ago, and have not found the owner, and I cannot think of any better cause than the one you are engaged in to apply it to. If you think it will do any good you might use it toward sending a copy of “Social Problems” and “Progress and Poverty” to such men as Rev. Sam Jones and Rev. Sam Small, or any others that you may think honest enough to be convinced by facts. A half dozen more like yourself and Father McGlynn and the day is won. We are away behind down here. As soon as I am able to contribute from my own means I shall do so.

Very respectfully, H. J. CLAVIER.

MONROE, Mich.—I shall advocate the claims of THE STANDARD to the attention of thinking men at any and all times, though my duties will not permit me to make an arduous canvass for it. I shall be on the alert to spread the light.

Like the Tammany hall man in a recent number, my present position is such that a too strong advocacy of what I believe might imperil the bread for my wife and babies, but I am waiting for the day when I can openly advocate the land doctrine. Ten years ago I said to some friends that the day of a great change was coming, how or when I knew not,—but I believed I should live to see it. They called me a crank. They have stopped calling names now, and begin to believe that, “Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin” has been written on the wall.

One word more. I used to believe that the Catholic priesthood were the bulwarks of bigotry. But when I read of Dr. McGlynn, and the thoughtful Catholics who are standing by him in his resistance to Italian dictation in American affairs; when I read his creed in his lectures to the Anti-poverty society, I find I am in error, and think that possibly the light may come from the Nazareth I had despised. God speed the day of its dawning.

Yours truly, A. B.

DUNKIRK, N. Y.—About two years ago I sent to New York for a copy of “Progress and Poverty,” and after carefully reading it handed it to a friend, and sent for the rest of your works; but I did not stop there. I commenced to talk about the doctrines taught in these books in the shop where I worked, in the stores where I traded and on the street; in fact, whenever I had five minutes to spare I devoted them to what I considered my duty to my fellow man. The next step I took was in reading a chapter every day from “Free Trade, or Protection?” in my workshop. In this way I have done what I could to “spread the light.”

FRANCIS LAKE.

——, Minn.—My husband’s subscription to THE STANDARD has expired and sic he has not the money to renew it. Will you please to continue it and he will send you a year’s rate after 8th of July, as we will be getting money then. The house is lonesome without THE STANDARD. This is a terrible hard place; we’ve lost our crops so often last year by hail storms.

—— ——.

ASPEN, Col.—Inclosed find postal note for my subscription to THE STANDARD. I have been a reader of your paper since the first issue. I have been talking “the land for the people” for twenty-five years and expected the democratic party, to which I belonged, to be true to its principles, but I find there is no difference between the republican party and them, therefore let my voice swell the chorus, “The people must and shall have their inheritance.” All hail to the noble Dr. McGlynn! May the Lord take a liking to him!

CHAS. A. CHAPMAN.

PORTLAND, Ore.—I send you my subscription for the balance of the year. I don’t want to be left without my paper, as there are about twenty others eager to read it after I get through, and after that it even goes as far north as Alaska, with a fireman on the steamer.

WILLIAM CARTWRIGHT.

LOWELL, Mass.—Inclosed please find $1 initiation fee to the Anti-poverty society. I wish to have my name enrolled among the names of those who love their fellow men. I am doing all I can in every way I can to forward the principles of justice and land reform, and I have made some converts. My talents are humble, but as much as I can that I will do to hasten the great emancipation, for I believe—

Oppression will not always last,
  There comes a better day
When right shall over might prevail,
And truth like heroes armed in mail,
The host of tyrants, wrong, assail,
  And hold eternal sway.

GEORGE H. BROWNE.

PHILADELPHIA.—I take this method to give vent to my feelings, for I feel that at last a cause has arisen in this world that a person can live and die for. And as I have taken THE STANDARD since the first issue I wish now to say that I like it better and better of late. That part of it called “Publisher’s Notes” is very good indeed, for, while I wish the cause well and talk “Georgeism” and contribute something for literature, lectures, etc., those notes make me feel as though I ought to do something more, so, as in the past I contributed a certain amount each month, I will double it for the future; and if you keep adding fuel to the fire you have kindled within me perhaps I will do myself an injury—that is, some people might think so.

The suggestion in this week’s STANDARD that the New York society is going to arrange us into groups and send each one of us the address of every member in our locality I hail with joy, for at times, if it wasn’t for receiving THE STANDARD every week, I should feel very much isolated.

And now please find inclosed two dollars

p. 8, col. 3 for sending THE STANDARD wherever you think it will do the most good. I remain, very much devoted to the cause,

FRANK SCANLAN.

CHIHUAHUA, Mexico.—I send a check for subscription to THE STANDARD and fee for membership in the Anti-poverty society. I have a number of your tracts which I distribute with pleasure, and I keep your books circulated.

N. D. ALMA.

SACRAMENTO, Cal.—I bought a copy of “Progress and Poverty” when it first came out, read it, and was convinced. I am a constant reader of THE STANDARD, and have prevailed upon my assembly of the K. of L. to subscribe for five copies. Workingmen are doing a great deal of thinking nowadays.

D. M.

LOS ANGELES, Cal.—Here is a place where a poor man has no chance at all. Land is boomed so high that a man who wants a home for himself and family has to leave. Even the ministers are preaching of the great success of the country, and of the blessed boom they are having. It is enough to make any man a socialist or an anarchist. I must have some of those tracts of yours to set our people thinking. I am a news agent on the railway, and will do all I can for THE STANDARD along my route.

—— ——.

ELMIRA, N. Y.—I can’t do much at writing, but money talks. Here is $5 to speak for me. Put it to the recruiting fund.

F. BISHOP.

ASBURY PARK.—Deer STANDURD: My mamma has been teling me about the poor Childeren in the Tenement housis. She sais wen you win thare will be no more. I cried when she told me. We are heer by the see side, and it is nice. My papa gave me a quarter. Please take it so there wil bee no more tenements. I am Eight yeres old. Your loving litle freud,

BESSIE.

PITTSBURG, Pa.—Long may THE STANDARD wave. Here’s a dollar to help wave it.

G. S. P.

There! Isn’t that a lovely batch of letters? Doesn’t it quicken the pulse and moisten the eye to read them? East and west and north and south the seed is springing up and ripening. Isn’t there encouragement for work in all this? Ah! friends, it needs but steady effort on our part, a long pull, a strong pull and a pull altogether, to secure the victory. And when that happy day shall come, when poverty and greed and degrading, embruting toil shall be once and forever swept away, and the world made clean and pure for the coming of the kingdom, thrice happy will be he who can say: “I also did my share of work toward the earth’s redemption.” Courage, friends! The eastern sky is golden with the coming dawn. Yet a little longer—a little patience—a little earnest work—and your eyes shall see the glory of the coming of the Lord. For truth demands it, justice wills it, and heaven itself has promised it.

The recruiting fund is doing fairly well; mind, we say fairly well, and that means not as well as it ought to. If this crusade of ours were a movement for sending moral pocket handkerchiefs to the heathen or something of that sort, we should say the fund was a big success; but as an aid to such an object as the extirpation of poverty, it is rather inadequate. STANDARD readers, this ought not to be. The work of this fund is your work, done for your benefit, and by your wishes, and you ought to support it. It costs money to spread the knowledge of the truth, and that money you ought to find. We have a right to ask it, and you should regard it as a privilege to give it. Now, let us see the recruiting fund roll up next week. Meantime, here is how it stands at present:

Previously acknowledged $116 46
F. Bishop, Elmira, N. Y 5 00
Bessie, Asbury Park 25
G. S. P., Pittsburg, Pa 1 00
H. J. Clavier, New Orleans 10 00
Frank Scanlan, Philadelphia 2 00
Two citizens 1 50
“Land for the People” 2 00
I and another 3 00
Annie Mac 50
John Marsden, Gouldsville, Vt 50
Total $142 21

The Testimony of a Protestant Religious Journal.

New York Independent.

It is little less than astounding to see what is the extent of the following Dr. McGlynn has in his rebellion against the interference of the ecclesiastical machine with his political liberty. That wonderful meeting and parade in his honor on Saturday night, June 18, was something to open the eyes of Protestants and Catholics. That scores of leading Irish Catholics should not hesitate even to defy the pope is wonderful. A dozen declare in interviews for the press that “if all the popes in heaven and earth should condemn Dr. McGlynn’s land theories they will stand by him.” We print from a private letter written by a well educated Irishwoman who went out to see that 121?

Saturday night I passed up Union square and stopped at several places where I saw two or more men in conversation. I wanted to know what the sentiments were of those who came to look on. They were all on the McGlynn side. One man said: “I would like to give that man Corrigan six months on the island, and, if I had my way about it, without much ceremony.” This same man said: “There is nowhere in the Bible that Jesus Christ addressed his disciples as ‘My Lord Peter,’ or ‘My Lord John, James, etc.’ Great guns! if our Lord Jesus Christ came now to address his representatives in Rome or elsewhere he would not know how to begin with the great string of titles these fellows have stuck before their names. Religion must be simple and free. No one can or must lock up another person’s mind and keep him from thinking until it suits him. As Hugh O. Pentecost said: ‘If a man has an idea his theories are right he will preach them to the elements if there is no one else to preach to.’” Everywhere I stopped I heard the most forcible language. Even the police had nothing to do but discuss the matter. I heard more than ten intelligent looking men, old and young, say they had done with the church. After this business it was only a humbug, only a money business.

It Is the Machine, and Not the Faith, that Protestants Object To.

New York Independent.

Excommunication does not mean so much as it did. It will not hurt the good, if misguided, priest much to be excommunicated. His faith toward God will be just the same, only he will be free of the “machine.” And it is just that machine, and not the faith, however imperfect that may be, in which Protestants think they see an anti-Christ. Take away the machine, and we could be in the same fellowship of Christian brotherhood with the Catholic church as with a number of Protestant churches. And we fully believe, with Dr. McGlynn, that the noblest part of the Catholic church’s history will come when her chief bishop sits humble and simple as Peter, when bishops concern themselves only with the propagation of the gospel and the conversion of the world.

Is This Our Country or the English sic Country?

Kansas City Star.

The earl of Aberdeen, who was in the city yesterday, is a man of large wealth and part of it is in this country. The earl and a lord own a vast amount of land in the United States, and belong to that unsavory class known as alien land owners. The earl is a pleasantly disposed person and may be bent upon improving his ranch, but he is part of a system which is no longer popular with the people of America. Foreign land syndicates composed of men, who, like the earl, intend to remain absentees, should not be encouraged or permitted. The public domain is rapidly getting smaller and should be held for those who want to make permanent settlement thereon. Men who live in other countries should not by the fact of their money be allowed to buy and hold American land.

p. 8, col. 4

The Land Belongs To All.

(Air—“Uncle Sam’s Farm.”)

Have you heard the great 122?
  Which this mighty truth has made,
Sweeping over land and ocean?
  Have you joined the New Crusade—
Where the people all are learning,
  Like a revelation grand,
God’s eternal truth concerning
  This great question of the land?

CHORUS.

Then swell the song, loud and long!
  Land must be free;
Join the crusade! right this wrong!
  Down with poverty!
Hear the truth by prophets told,
  Then heed the call,
“Land shall not be forever sold,”
  For it belongs to all.

Grand, indeed, that revolution,
  In the days of Washington;
But the law of evolution
  Shows the battle then begun
Must be waged in every nation,
  Till all people understand,
Every man, whate’er his station,
  Has an equal right to land.
    Chorus.

We have had emancipation
  Proclamations for the slave,
And a temperance reformation
  By true women, grand and brave;
But a greater curse than slav’ry
  Stalks abroad on every hand,
Foster father of all knav’ry—
  This monopoly of land.
    Chorus.

Soldiers, then, from every station,
  Come and join our grand brigade;
Forward march, let every nation
  Rally round the new crusade.
Hoist the standard; truth and justice
  Are most mighty—they must win;
Rally, then, for peace and progress,
  Hail our chiefs, George and McGlynn.

CHORUS.

Then swell the song, loud and long,
  Land must be free.
Join the crusade, right this wrong,
  Down with poverty.
This good old truth is grand enough;
  When thieves disgorge
Then we shall all have land enough;
  All hail McGlynn and George.

B. M. LAWRENCE, M. D.

39 West Twenty-seventh street.

Rumors in the Enemy’s Camp.

New York World.

The word has been quietly passed around among local politicians that, in the next city elections, the labor party will not indorse any candidate of the democratic or republican factions, but will insist that its nominees shall stand squarely upon the George platform and disavow former connections or present relations with partisan organizations. In the plainest possible words, no one who claims to be either a democrat or a republican will be supported by the labor vote. This information is so important if true—and it comes from the best authority—that all the politicians are disturbed by it. To renounce their affiliations with the great national parties might cut them off from future promotion as certainly as opposition to the labor party might defeat them in this city next autumn. Besides, there is the land theory of Mr. George and the religious idiosyncrasy of Dr. McGlynn. Altogether, the lot of a New York politician this summer is not a happy one.

Is Selfishness the Cause?

New Jersey Unionist.

Two things are passing strange to us. One is the apparent inability of educated men, supposed to be trained thinkers, to understand Mr. George’s theory, which is really very simple. The other is the disposition to discuss it, not with reference to its rightness or wrongness, but with regard of what would happen to the world in general should it prevail, and particularly what would happen to “me and my family.”

[Advertisement] CURE FOR THE DEAF

Copy linkEdit

CURE FOR THE DEAF

PECK’S PATENT IMPROVED CUSHIONED EAR DRUMS Perfectly Restore the Hearing, and perform the work of the natural drum. Invisible, comfortable and always in position. All conversation and even whispers heard distinctly. Send for illustrated book with testimonials, FREE. Address F. HISCOX, 853 Broadway, N. Y.

Please mention this paper.

[Advertisement] Straiton & Storm’s Cigars

Copy linkEdit

ALWAYS THE SAME.

p8_fig1

[Illustration: engraving of a cigar with a decorated band]

STRAITON & STORM’S CIGARS.

[Advertisement] James Bogan

Copy linkEdit

JAMES BOGAN, PRINCIPAL AGENT for James Means’ $3 and $4 shoes. 226 BOWERY, near Prince street.

[Advertisement] S. Ulrich — Cabinet Photos

Copy linkEdit

REV. HUGH O. PENTECOST, DR. EDward sic and Henry George. 3 Cabinet Photos, 25c., post free; single, 10c. each. S. ULRICH, 15 First avenue, New York.

[Advertisement] Co-operative Hat Store

Copy linkEdit

CO-OPERATIVE

HAT STORE,

250 1-2——BOWERY——250 1-2

Agents for the Philadelphia Knights of Labor Co-Operative Hat Co.

[Advertisement] Holland’s Coffee and Dining Rooms

Copy linkEdit

HOLLAND’S COFFEE AND DINING ROOMS,

143 Fourth avenue,

Bet. 13th and 14th sts.

[Advertisement] Printing — Concord Co-operative Printing Company

Copy linkEdit

PRINTING.

CONCORD CO-OPERATIVE PRINTING COMPANY (Ld.),

47 and 49 Centre st., N. Y.,

BOOK, JOB AND NEWSPAPER PRINTING.

p. 8, col. 5

[Advertisement] Coogan Bros., Carpet and Furniture Dealers

Copy linkEdit
p8_fig3

[Illustration: engraving of the Coogan Brothers building, a five-storey store front with horse-drawn wagons and pedestrians in the street. Signs on the building: “COOGAN BROTHERS”; “WHOLESALE & RETAIL FURNITURE CARPETS &c.” (partly illegible); “BEDDING WAREROOMS”; “MANUFACTURERS”; “125 COOGAN BRO’S 121”]

COOGAN BROS.,

CARPET AND FURNITURE DEALERS,

COR. BOWERY AND GRAND STS.

[Advertisement] Life Size Portrait — N. Y. Artists’ Union

Copy linkEdit

LIFE SIZE PORTRAIT!

p8_fig7

[Illustration: ornamental picture frame containing an oval bust portrait of a woman]

ORIGINAL CRAYON

WITH

Bronze Frame, $12

Send photo, or imperfect likeness. Satisfaction given on all orders or no pay required. Call, write or wire, N. Y. ARTISTS’ UNION, Room 2, 10 E. 14th St., between 5th Ave. and Broadway.

AGENTS WANTED EVERYWHERE.

[Advertisement] To Consumptives — Winchester’s Hypophosphite

Copy linkEdit

TO CONSUMPTIVES

Use WINCHESTER’S HYPOPHOSPHITE OF LIME AND SODA. For Consumption, Weak Lungs, Coughs, Asthma, Bronchitis and General Debility it is an acknowledged Specific Remedy. TRY IT.

Price, $1 and $2 per bottle. Prepared only by

WINCHESTER & CO., Chemists,

162 William street, N. Y.

[Advertisement] Good News to Ladies — The Great American Tea Co. 

Copy linkEdit
p8_fig9

[Display cut, white letters on a black T-shaped panel: “THE GREAT AMERICAN TEA COMPANY”]

GOOD NEWS TO LADIES.

Greatest offer. Now’s your time to get orders for our celebrated Teas, Coffees and Baking Powder, and secure a beautiful Gold Band or Moss Rose China Tea Set, Dinner Set, Gold Band Moss Rose Toilet Set, Watch, Brass Lamp, Castor, or Webster’s Dictionary. For particulars address

THE GREAT AMERICAN TEA CO.,

P. O. Box 289. 31 and 33 Vesey St., New York.

LEGAL.

Copy linkEdit

TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, greeting: Know you that we, Ernest L. Duncker, Henry Gut and John Ruckert, all of the city of New York, intend to form a company called the Solidity Co-operative Clothing Company, upon the co-operative plan, in the business and occupation of manufacturing and selling clothing and the materials used in the manufacture of clothing, with the principal place of business in the city and county of New York. Dated June 20, 188[7?].

ERNEST L. DUNCKER,
HENRY GUT,
JOHN RUCKERT.

PHOTOGRAPHERS.

DRESSMAKING.

[Advertisement] Mrs. Brunon

DRESSMAKING.—MRS. BRUNON, FRENCH dressmaker. Prices moderate. No. 214 West [26th?] st. Third bell.

p. 8, col. 6

[Notice] A.—To Secretaries of Trade and Labor Organizations and Land and Labor Clubs.

Copy linkEdit

A.— TO SECRETARIES OF TRADE AND LABOR ORGANIZATIONS AND LAND AND LABOR CLUBS.

We have received an order to send a copy of “PROTECTION AND FREE sic” to every trade and labor organization or land and labor club that may wish to have it, up to the number of one thousand. A copy will be accordingly forwarded to the secretary of any labor organization, local assembly of the K. of L. or land and labor club on receipt of twelve cents for postage.

HENRY GEORGE & CO.

[Notice] Members of Labor Organizations

Copy linkEdit

MEMBERS OF LABOR ORGANIZAtions and others wishing to canvass for subscribers to this paper on a liberal commission are invited to send their names and addresses to the publishers of THE STANDARD, 25 Ann street, New York.

UNITED LABOR PARTY.

NEW YORK TO THE COUNTRY.

Headquarters Campaign Executive Committee,
Central Labor Union,
New York, November, 1886.
To Organized Labor throughout the United States,
Greeting:

The great moral victory which we have won in this city by the polling of 68,000 votes for our candidate in the campaign begun by the Central labor sic the congratulations which the men of New York have received from all parts of the country, encourage us to believe that it is now within the power of organized labor to begin a national movement that shall carry to triumphant success the great principles on which industrial and political emancipation must be based.

This campaign has shown us that by ignoring minor differences it is possible to unite the political power of labor on a platform confined to fundamental principles. What we have done in New York has been accomplished in the face of greater obstacles than exist anywhere else in the United States. We see that it is only necessary to improve our organization here to carry this city, and we believe that general organization must result in the formation of a national party that will sweep the country.

We call on organized labor everywhere to form political associations based on the principles of the platform of the convention of trade and labor associations of New York, and having in view political action, local, state and national, at the earliest possible moment.

It is sic that organized labor, wherever it sic take the initiative in this movement. But it is our opinion, confirmed by our recent experience, that the most effective organizations for political action are to be formed outside of labor associations, though as far as possible animated and controlled by their members. In this way we may avoid any conflict with the rules and regulations that forbid political action on the part of associations primarily designed for industrial purposes; may bring into our ranks a large class now outside of labor associations, but whose sympathies are thoroughly with us; may secure that organization by election districts which is necessary to efficient political work; and by means of reunions, lectures, the dissemination of literature, readings from sound works on social science, and debates, carry on the work of education. This is the course we have resolved to adopt in this city, and we commend a similar course to our brethren throughout the land. We believe the time has come when, for the accomplishment of its purposes, labor must step into the political arena, and, rallying all the forces that are upon its side, make an open fight for the assertion of those equal rights which the great charter of American liberty guarantees to us all, but which both the old political parties have heretofore ignored.

The difficulty which everywhere confronts us, in our efforts to raise wages and secure leisure, is the existence of an impoverished mass, forced by their necessities to accept work on any terms. Until we can lessen the intensity of that struggle for existence which makes so many men and women ready to do anything to procure the mere necessaries of life, the work of our labor associations must be conducted under tremendous disadvantages. Men who cannot find employment are everywhere the force which those who oppose us utilize to resist our just demands. It is therefore necessary that we should make war upon the great wrong which causes poverty—the primary injustice which makes the land on which and from which all of us must live the exclusive property of individuals, and denies to the rest of us the right to live and to work, unless we pay blackmail for the privilege.

We therefore ask you to form political associations based upon the principles set forth in our platform, and, through the central committee, room 28, Cooper Union, New York city, which has been appointed for that purpose, to put yourselves in communication with other similar associations throughout the land.

As soon as this work shall have gone far enough, a national conference will be called to organize the new party—a party powerful enough to re-write the laws and execute the people’s will.

By order of the executive committee.

JOHN McMACKIN, Chairman.

[Notice] 23rd Assembly District

Copy linkEdit

23RD ASSEMBLY DISTRICT MEETS every Monday evening. German speaking members every Tuesday evening at Vincent hall, 189[7?] Third avenue, corner 105th street. Open every evening for enrollment of members. Thursday and Saturday evenings free debates of the Progress and Poverty club.

LAND AND LABOR PARTY.

LAND AND LABOR.

The Central Committee has been organized for the purpose of carrying into state and national politics, by means of tracts, circulars, correspondence, lectures, etc., the principles of the United Labor Party of New York.

We oppose the stupid fiscal system that piles up hundreds of millions of dollars in our treasury vaults, while we are paying interest on an enormous debt; we aim at the abolition of the system which makes the railroad and the telegraph a means for the oppression of the people and the aggrandizement of an aristocracy of wealth and power; and we advocate the raising of all public revenues from a tax on land according to its value, throwing the burden of taxation upon mining lands and upon the wealthy monopolizers of land values in and near our great cities, thus relieving, on the one hand our crowded tenement population, and on the other the farming interest of our country, by removing all taxes from the products of industry.

Members of trade and labor organizations, and all citizens in favor of independent political action who are desirous of taking part in the formation of land and labor clubs, or in tract distribution, are requested to address

JOHN M’MACKIN,
Chairman Central Committee,
28 Cooper Union, N. Y. City.

Citizens of the following named states who indorse the principles of the United Labor party and desire to lend active aid in the great movement now beginning for the emancipation of labor, are requested to communicate with the State Organizers of their respective states, as follows:

California—Judge James G. Maguire, San Francisco.
Connecticut—Robert Pyne, 284 Asylum st., Hartford.
Indiana—Warren Worth Bailey, Vincennes.
Kentucky—Henry George Club, 258 Vine st., Cincinnati.
Massachusetts (Berkshire county)—F. Harvey Lincoln, box 115, Zylonite.
Minnesota—Central Committee, United Labor Party, 42 Third st. south, Minneapolis.
New York—John McMackin, 28 Cooper Union, New York city.
Ohio—Henry George Club, 258 Vine st., Cincinnati.
South Carolina—Benjamin Adams, Charleston.

[Notice] “The New Crusaders.”

Copy linkEdit

“THE NEW CRUSADERS.”

“I care not who write the sic of a country so long as I can write the people’s songs.”

We want to re-write some of the laws of our country. Let us begin the work by writing and singing the new songs of the people.

MISS AGATHA MUNIER.

known so well, not only as the former Leader of the Choir of St. Stephen’s Roman Catholic church, but for her earnest sympathy and active endeavors in behalf of the Labor Movement in this city, has decided to organize and instruct several Great Choruses of Male and Female voices, enlisted from the ranks of the people themselves. It is Miss Munier’s hope to drill these united voices for active work in the Political Campaign of the coming fall, when by concerts for the benefit of the Labor fund, and by free music at lectures and public meetings, the voice of the people may be heard in the songs of labor.

Applicants for admission to these classes may address or call on MISS MUNIER, at 223 East Thirty-second street.

CO-OPERATIVE COLONY.

Copy linkEdit

PERSONS DESIRING HOMESTEAD OR seeking investments should join or subscribe to the Co-operative Colocy Association now organizing for the purpose of securing and locating of a sufficient tract of available land in the Rio Grande Valley for the carrying on of the business of agriculture and stock raising on the co-operative plan.

For information and map of New Mexico, address

SEC’Y CO-OPERATIVE COLONY,
P. O. Box 214, Pueblo, Col.

About this issue

Original spelling and punctuation are kept as printed. Misprints are marked sic; where the editor has corrected one, the text shows the correction and its note gives what was printed. Uncertain readings are in [brackets?]. Everything set in this sans-serif type, in blue or grey, was added by the edition and is not part of the 1887 text.

Full table of contents (196 items, with types and authors)

Page 1

Col Item Type Author
1–6 THE STANDARD masthead —
1 ★ [T]HE COMING EXCOMMUNICATION. editorial unsigned — Ed.: Henry George
1 ★ [Editorial note: Rome’s decision promulgated on the Fourth of July] editorial note unsigned
1 ★ [Editorial note: the cause of McGlynn’s excommunication and the Catholic hierarchy] editorial note unsigned
1–2 ★ [Editorial note: the pro-poverty press on the excommunication] editorial note unsigned
2 ★ [Editorial note: what the excommunication will do] editorial note unsigned
2–3 ★ [Editorial note: Edward McGlynn is to be excommunicated] editorial note unsigned
3–4 ★ UNDER THE BAN. poem J. Anketell — Ed.: J. Ancketell
3 ★ [Editorial note: Consider who is to be excommunicated] editorial note unsigned
3–4 ★ [Editorial note: accommodations for reporters] editorial note unsigned
4 ★ [Editorial note: the united labor party’s Syracuse convention] editorial note unsigned
4–5 ★ [Editorial note: the union labor party] editorial note unsigned
5 ★ [Editorial note: a short platform] editorial note unsigned
5 ★ [Editorial note: restriction of immigration and T. V. Powderly] editorial note Henry George
5 ★ The “Isolated” Priest in Milwaukee. news —
5 A Right Divine. letter Catholic
5 Earnest Men in Lancaster, Pa. letter Henry W. Stein
5 Perpotuating Slavery in Africa. news —
5 ★ The McGlynn Fund. notice —
6 ★ ST. BERNARD AND EDWARD MᶜGLYNN. A Thoughtful Letter from a Catholic Priest—An Illustration from the History of St. Bernard. letter A Catholic Priest
6 Give Capital and Labor a Chance. letter N. D.
6 Can’t Keep a Copy of “The Standard” Long. letter Edward Costello

Page 2

Col Item Type Author
1–4 ★ ANTI-POVERTY. AN ENTHUSIASTIC MEETING, NOTWITHSTANDING THE HOT WEATHER. A Stirring Address by Rev. C. M. Winchester of Middletown, N. Y.—Thoughtful Words on the Pope-Corrigan Situation by Michael Clarke—John McMackin Speaks for the United Labor Party—“Let Them Excommunicate if They Dare.” report —
4 A Knife Grinder’s Story. letter John Carreer
4 The People Are Thinking. letter Edward McGarrity
4 A Brother in the North. letter Victor McGuffin
4 Rev. J. B. Barnhill on the Cross of the New Crusade. notice —
5 ★ THE APPEAL TO ROME. A Priestly Correspondent Gives Some Important Points in Canon Law. letter —
5–6 It Was a Lazy Man’s Paradise, But That Time Has Gone. (Exchange) reprint —
6 Now Figure Out the Profit on That Purchase, and Remember that Somebody Has Made It All. (Toledo Blade) reprint —
6 No Public Land to Be Had. (Springfield, Mass., Republican) reprint —
6 There is a Better Blessing Than That in Store for Them. (San Francisco Argonaut) reprint —
6 Emigration from Italy. (Philadelphia Telegram) reprint —
6 The Wisdom of Foresight. (Philadelphia Record (New York correspondent)) reprint —
6 Alabama’s Great Opportunity. (Mobile Item) reprint Edward Q. Norton
6 Must Sell or Die. (Toronto Labor Reformer) reprint —
6 ★ Listen to Whitelaw Reid. (New York Tribune (editorial)) reprint —

Page 3

Col Item Type Author
1 QUERIES AND ANSWERS. A Threadbare Question. letter G.
1 If. letter George Lawrence
1 Twenty-Fifth of Henry VIII. letter Poyntz Fox
1–2 Wealth Concentration. letter Frenchman
2 Co-Operation. letter William H. Smith
2 “Made” Land. letter Wm. E. Fellendorf
2–3 Money. letter H. S. Chase
3 He Dies Young. letter E. W. J.
3 A Case of Hardship. letter C. W. Phillips
3–4 ★ The Best Way to Find Out. letter Henry de Koch
4 Notes. editorial note unsigned — Ed.: D. M. Hunter, J. H. Milleur, W. Curtis Taylor, Levi R. Pierce
4 Another New Name for the Party. letter Charles F. Kipp
4 A Sample Case of Western “Progress.” letter W. H. Creamer
4 Farmers in the South. news —
4 A Man Who is Thinking. letter Worker
4 And That Is the Anti-Poverty Society We Are Re-establishing Now. (New York Observer) reprint —
4 Can’t a Young Man Look to the Rise of Land Values for Wealth? (Toronto, Can., Christian Guardian) reprint —
5–6 WHERE THE CHURCHES STAND. Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost Speaks Frankly on the Subject—Missions Are Simply Church Poor Houses. sermon Hugh O. Pentecost
6 Words of Wisdom. (New York Sun) reprint —
6 Isn’t This Sound Common Sense? (Burlington, Ia., Justice) reprint —
6 The Way Protection Works. (Philadelphia Record) reprint —
6 The “Star” Is Impressed, in Spite of Its Pro-Poverty Principles. (New York Star) reprint —
6 Why Employers Combine. (Real Estate Record and Guide) reprint —

Page 4

Col Item Type Author
1 ★ THE STANDARD. notice —
1 SATURDAY, JULY 9, 1887. notice —
1–2 JACOB SHARP. editorial unsigned
2 THE NEW FOURTH OF JULY. editorial unsigned
2–3 [Editorial note: a Philadelphia paper on whole houses and tenements] editorial note unsigned
3 [Editorial note: co-operation and land tenure] editorial note unsigned
3 [Editorial note: the price of air and sunlight] editorial note unsigned
3 [Editorial note: Anti-poverty society membership certificates] notice —
3 [Editorial note: a suggestion for Archbishop Corrigan’s next pastoral] editorial note unsigned
3–4 FOURTH OF JULY AT SUMMIT HILL. The Sort of Independence They Have in the Lehigh Valley—Miners Paying $3.50 a Ton for Coal—Poverty in the Midst of Unbounded Natural Opportunities—The Mysteries of Overproduction. letter —
4 The Fourth in the Coal Regions. report —
4 The United Labor Party on Independence Day. report —
4 The New Wine in the Old Bottle. letter A Britisher
4 Failures in the First Half of 1886. news —
4 How to Dispose of the Ludlow, Vt., Farms. letter E. Y.
4 The Movement in Pennsylvania. news —
4 No Hope in Political Churchianity. letter Stewart Carlisle
4–5 The Land Question in Alabama. letter W. H. Davidson
5 As Manufacturers They Lacked Brains to Succeed, as Land Owners They Didn’t Need Any Brains. letter E. W. Nellis
5 They Want It Right Here, and as Soon as Possible, Too. letter Wideawake
5 The Railroads and Real Estate. (Grand Rapids Workman) reprint —
5 Not Born Free and Equal. (Providence People (correspondence)) reprint —
5 Houses and the Death Rate. (Boston Transcript) reprint —
5 Another Opinion of the “Post’s” About Cursing. (Evening Post, July 5) reprint —
5 Barry’s Opinion. (Cincinnati Enquirer) reprint —
5 And They Need Not Have Worked Either. (St. Paul Dispatch) reprint —
6 SOCIETY NOTES. (partly: New York World; New York Tribune; Boston Traveller; New York Times) news —
6 An Admission to be Noted. (New York World) reprint —

Page 5

Col Item Type Author
1 ★ Father McGlynn. (London Saturday Review) poem —
1–3 ★ THE POOR MAN’S COURT. article Louis F. Post
3 CUTTING ADRIFT. A Prominent Republican of Colorado Leaves the Old Party to Fight for the New Issues. news —
3 ★ Ringing Resolutions From a K. of L. Assembly. news —
3 The Boom in California. (San Francisco Call) reprint —
4 A PENNSYLVANIA MINING TOWN. Mahanoy Plane and Its Surroundings—God’s Goodness to Mr. Shafer—It Takes a Day’s Work to Buy a Ton of Coal, Though a Few Minutes’ Work Will Mine It—Ringing Fourth of July Resolutions. report —
4–5 ★ The Land and Labor Demonstration in Cincinnati. report —
5 And it Would Start a Great Many Other Booms Besides, a Building Boom, too. (Anoka, Ky., Union (correspondence) [as printed; probably Anoka, Minn.]) reprint —
5 Ireland’s Jubilee Year. (Dublin Freeman’s Journal) reprint —
6 Content. poem J. L. Joynes (translator)
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Chicago Mail] (Chicago Mail) reprint —
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [note on the Cork Eagle] editorial note unsigned
6 STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from New York Uptown Visitor] (New York Uptown Visitor) reprint —
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from St. Louis Evening Chronicle] (St. Louis Evening Chronicle) reprint —
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Exchange] (Exchange) reprint —
6 STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Utica Herald] (Utica Herald) reprint —
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Buffalo Sunday Truth] (Buffalo Sunday Truth) reprint —
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from Mobile Sunday Times (editorial notes)] (Mobile Sunday Times (editorial notes)) reprint —
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from New York Social Science] (New York Social Science) reprint —
6 ★ STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from San Francisco Call] (San Francisco Call) reprint —
6 STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from St. Louis New Order] (St. Louis New Order) reprint —
6 STRAWS WHICH SHOW THE WIND. [extract from New York World] (New York World) reprint —
6 We Don’t, Eh? And Pray, Who Is “We?” (Mail and Express (Cyrus W. Field’s)) reprint —

Page 6

Col Item Type Author
1–6 GANSEVOORT MARKET. article —
6 Is This Anarchy, or Only Common Sense? (Hamilton, Ont., Times) reprint —
6 “Out of Debt.” (Burlington, Ia., Justice) reprint —
6 Creating Wealth by Labor. (Toledo News) letter Faraway Moses
6 Presbyterianism and Anti-Poverty. (Presbyterian Observer) letter A True Blue Presbyterian and a George Man
6 A Philanthropist Who Provides Work. (Springfield Republican) news —
6 For Pity’s Sake! Aren’t They Doing So? (Paterson Guardian (printed ‘Patterson Guardian’)) reprint —

Page 7

Col Item Type Author
1 The Masque of Life. poem —
1–3 THE POOR, POORER? article —
3 ★ An Open Letter to Professor David Swing. letter W. H. Van Ornum
3 When Mr. Warder Retires Will He Talk About How He Worked for His Money? (Springfield, Ohio, Republic (quoting the Philadelphia Times)) reprint —
3 It’s a Very Simple Question. (Horse Collar Makers’ Journal) reprint —
3 The Bodyke Tenants. (Mail and Express (correspondence)) reprint —
4–5 ★ LAND AND LABOR. report —
5 Organizing in Philadelphia. report J. H. M.
5 Work in Minneapolis. report A. Dollenmayer
5 [Letter from Tampa, Fla., on a new land and labor club] letter John H. McCormick
5 ★ This Sort of Thing Passes ’for Argument With the Pro-Poverty Press. (New York Sun) reprint —
5 Anti-Poverty Societies of One. (Kansas City Star) reprint —
5 ★ NEW PUBLICATIONS. HENRY GEORGE’S SOLUTION OF THE LABOR PROBLEM. WHY I PREACHED ON IT. advertisement —
5 THE PHONOGRAPHIC MAGAZINE. advertisement —
6 ★ NEW PUBLICATIONS. HENRY GEORGE’S NEW BOOK, PROTECTION OR FREE TRADE? AN EXAMINATION OF THE TARIFF QUESTION WITH ESPECIAL REGARD TO THE INTERESTS OF LABOR. advertisement —
6 ★ THE LAND AND LABOR LIBRARY.— advertisement —
6 ★ GERMAN EDITION OF “PROGRESS AND POVERTY.” FORTSCHRITT UND ARMUTH. advertisement —
6 ★ JUST OUT. AN ACCOUNT OF THE GEORGE-HEWITT CAMPAIGN. advertisement —
6 THE DEMOCRAT. A RADICAL REVIEW MONTHLY. advertisement —
6 TAX REFORMER. advertisement —
6 NATURAL RIGHTS, NATURAL LIBERTY and NATURAL LAW. advertisement —

Page 8

Col Item Type Author
1 PUBLISHER’S NOTES. editorial note unsigned — Ed.: Elizabeth F. B., A. Vinette, Henry C. Power, E. B. Crane, H. J. Clavier, Francis Lake, Chas. A. Chapman, William Cartwright, George H. Browne, Frank Scanlan, N. D. Alma, D. M., F. Bishop, Bessie, G. S. P.,
1 [Publisher’s note: Our cause wants men] editorial note unsigned
1 [Letter from Buffalo, N. Y.] letter Elizabeth F. B——
1 [Publisher’s note: recruit subscriptions] editorial note unsigned
1 [Publisher’s note: a look into our mail bag] editorial note unsigned
1–2 [Letter from Los Angeles, Cal.] letter A. Vinette
2 [Letter from New York City] letter Henry C. Power
2 [Letter from Ridgewood, N. J.] letter E. B. Crane
2 [Letter from New Orleans] letter H. J. Clavier
2 [Letter from Monroe, Mich.] letter A. B.
2 [Letter from Dunkirk, N. Y.] letter Francis Lake
2 [Letter from ——, Minn.] letter —
2 [Letter from Aspen, Col.] letter Chas. A. Chapman
2 [Letter from Portland, Ore.] letter William Cartwright
2 [Letter from Lowell, Mass.] letter George H. Browne
2–3 [Letter from Philadelphia] letter Frank Scanlan
3 [Letter from Chihuahua, Mexico] letter N. D. Alma
3 [Letter from Sacramento, Cal.] letter D. M.
3 [Letter from Los Angeles, Cal.] letter —
3 [Letter from Elmira, N. Y.] letter F. Bishop
3 [Letter from Asbury Park] letter Bessie
3 [Letter from Pittsburg, Pa.] letter G. S. P.
3 [Publisher’s note: There! Isn’t that a lovely batch of letters?] editorial note unsigned
3 [Publisher’s note: the recruiting fund] editorial note unsigned
3 ★ The Testimony of a Protestant Religious Journal. (New York Independent) reprint —
3 ★ It Is the Machine, and Not the Faith, that Protestants Object To. (New York Independent) reprint —
3 Is This Our Country or the English Nobiliyt’s Country? (Kansas City Star) reprint —
4 The Land Belongs To All. poem B. M. Lawrence, M. D. — Ed.: R. M. Lawrence, M. D.
4 Rumors in the Enemy’s Camp. (New York World) reprint —
4 Is Selfishness the Cause? (New Jersey Unionist) reprint —
4 CURE FOR THE DEAF advertisement —
4 ALWAYS THE SAME. STRAITON & STORM’S CIGARS. advertisement —
4 A HOT KITCHEN Can be avoided by using ADAMS & WESTLAKE’S OIL AND GAS STOVES. advertisement —
4 JAMES BOGAN, PRINCIPAL AGENT for James Means’ $3 and $4 shoes. advertisement —
4 ★ ANTI-POVERTY SOCIETY. advertisement —
4 [S. Ulrich: cabinet photos of Pentecost, McGlynn and George] advertisement —
4 CO-OPERATIVE HAT STORE, advertisement —
4 HOLLAND’S COFFEE AND DINING ROOMS, advertisement —
4 PRINTING. CONCORD CO-OPERATIVE PRINTING COMPANY (Ld.), advertisement —
5 COOGAN BROS., CARPET AND FURNITURE DEALERS, advertisement —
5 [Braham’s: WHO WOULDN’T BE DRESSED WELL] advertisement —
5 [Keystone Dust Proof Watches: IS THE BEST GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU?] advertisement —
5 LIFE SIZE PORTRAIT! advertisement —
5 MAJOR’S CEMENT advertisement —
5 TO CONSUMPTIVES advertisement —
5 GOOD NEWS TO LADIES. advertisement —
5 Piso’s Remedy for Catarrh advertisement —
5 LEGAL. TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN notice Ernest L. Duncker; Henry Gut; John Ruckert
5 PHOTOGRAPHERS. CHARLES B. SCHAIDNER, advertisement —
5 DRESSMAKING. MRS. BRUNON advertisement —
6 ★ A.— TO SECRETARIES OF TRADE AND LABOR ORGANIZATIONS AND LAND AND LABOR CLUBS. notice Henry George & Co.
6 MEMBERS OF LABOR ORGANIZAtions and others wishing to canvass notice —
6 UNITED LABOR PARTY. NEW YORK TO THE COUNTRY. notice John McMackin (for the executive committee)
6 23RD ASSEMBLY DISTRICT MEETS every Monday evening. notice —
6 LAND AND LABOR PARTY. LAND AND LABOR. notice John McMackin (Chairman Central Committee)
6 “THE NEW CRUSADERS.” notice —
6 CO-OPERATIVE COLONY. advertisement —
About this text (7 notes on this issue)

  • [word?] is a best guess; [illegible] means unreadable. Line-end hyphens are joined. Misprints are kept as printed; letters judged to be broken type are written as intended but listed among the misprints (marked “broken type”).

  • p1: the scan cuts off the left edge of c1; the first one or two letters of almost every line are supplied in square brackets (e.g. “[a]nd boldly”); these are reconstructions, not guesses.

  • p4: “Failures in the First Half of 1886” and “July 1, 1886” are probably 1887; the masthead street number is “[25?]”.

  • p5: “Anoka, Ky., Union” (Anoka is in Minnesota); “Prudhomme’s” probably Proudhon’s (in the quoted paper).

  • p6: the street map of the Gansevoort market district (top of c2–c5) is saved as a figure; “55 mills” on $2,000 is printed as $105.

  • p8: the Anti-Poverty Society notice gives “SUNDAY EVENING, JULY” with no day.

  • Editor’s notes (Ed.): 122 notes by the editor, Wyn Achenbaum. 59 are placed at the word, name or phrase they explain. 63 could not be matched to a word and are placed by their order in the editor’s list, marked (Position approximate.) Where the editor names an author the paper does not, the contents show it as Ed.: name.

Damaged type restored

Letters that were broken, blotted or missing in the print and have been written as intended. Listed so they can be checked against the scan; they are not footnoted in the text.

Page Article As read in the scan Written as
1 [Editorial note: accommodations for reporters] [damaged]ccommodations accommodations
1 [Editorial note: the union labor party] politician[broken] politicians.
1 The McGlynn Fund. [broken S]omerville Somerville
1 ST. BERNARD AND EDWARD MᶜGLYNN. A Thoughtful Letter from a C ! (blotted question marks) ?
2 ANTI-POVERTY. AN ENTHUSIASTIC MEETING, NOTWITHSTANDING THE H [damaged]o vacate to vacate
2 ANTI-POVERTY. AN ENTHUSIASTIC MEETING, NOTWITHSTANDING THE H McG[damaged]ynn. McGlynn.
2 A Knife Grinder’s Story. [damaged]nd wages have dropped And wages have dropped
2 THE APPEAL TO ROME. A Priestly Correspondent Gives Some Impo exe[broken]cising exercising
2 It Was a Lazy Man’s Paradise, But That Time Has Gone. bee[broken] been
2 Now Figure Out the Profit on That Purchase, and Remember tha an[broken] Remember and Remember
2 Now Figure Out the Profit on That Purchase, and Remember tha Onl[broken] … te[broken]ritory … w[broken]th Only … territory … with
2 Now Figure Out the Profit on That Purchase, and Remember tha $100,0[broken]0 $100,000
2 Emigration from Italy. Neapolita[broken] … a[broken]d … S[broken]th … [broken]f the Platte Neapolitan … and … South … of the Platte
2 Alabama’s Great Opportunity. gove[broken]nment … ev[broken]ry government … every
3 If. I own (broken type) I own
3 Twenty-Fifth of Henry VIII. England (broken type) England
3 Co-Operation. co-operation (broken type) co-operation
3 A Case of Hardship. community (broken type) community
3 A Case of Hardship. present (broken type) present
3 Farmers in the South. the (broken type) the
3 WHERE THE CHURCHES STAND. Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost Speaks Fran to (broken type) to
3 WHERE THE CHURCHES STAND. Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost Speaks Fran find (broken type) find
3 WHERE THE CHURCHES STAND. Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost Speaks Fran was (broken type) was
3 WHERE THE CHURCHES STAND. Rev. Hugh O. Pentecost Speaks Fran me (broken type) me
3 The Way Protection Works. plethoric (broken type) plethoric
4 THE STANDARD. [blotted] ENRY GEORGE, [blotted] ANN STREET and other blotted initial letters at left edge of c1 the words as transcribed
4 THE NEW FOURTH OF JULY. liberty [blotted]s an ; out from [filled]atural opportunities liberty is an ; natural
4 [Editorial note: a Philadelphia paper on whole houses and te has b[blotted]n casually directed has been
4 FOURTH OF JULY AT SUMMIT HILL. The Sort of Independence They [n damaged]ot because they have to mine coal not
4 The Fourth in the Coal Regions. Regionr, Regions.
4 The United Labor Party on Independence Day. large [and blotted] enthusiastic ; Profes[blotted]or large and enthusiastic ; Professor
4 The Movement in Pennsylvania. Dr. McGiynn Dr. McGlynn
4 Not Born Free and Equal. Why shut e[broken]s and eyes ears
4 Another Opinion of the “Post’s” About Cursing. some cursi[broken]g done cursing
5 THE POOR MAN’S COURT. but (broken type) but
5 THE POOR MAN’S COURT. To the (broken type) To the
5 THE POOR MAN’S COURT. federal (broken type) federal
5 THE POOR MAN’S COURT. Rich (broken type) Rich
5 THE POOR MAN’S COURT. choked before (broken type) choked before
5 THE POOR MAN’S COURT. 1880 (broken type) 1880
5 CUTTING ADRIFT. A Prominent Republican of Colorado Leaves th the simplification (broken type) the simplification
5 And it Would Start a Great Many Other Booms Besides, a Build a (broken type) a
5 We Don’t, Eh? And Pray, Who Is “We?” Who Is “We?” (damaged marks) Who Is “We?”
5 We Don’t, Eh? And Pray, Who Is “We?” don’t (broken type) don’t
6 GANSEVOORT MARKET. If the the reader If the reader
6 GANSEVOORT MARKET. put (damaged first letter) put
6 GANSEVOORT MARKET. nothing (damaged) nothing
6 Creating Wealth by Labor. in (damaged) in
7 The Masque of Life. Doth thou see this man? Dost thou see this man?
7 The Masque of Life. he (broken type) he
7 THE POOR, POORER? your (broken type) your
7 THE POOR, POORER? from (broken type) from
7 NEW PUBLICATIONS. HENRY GEORGE’S NEW BOOK, PROTECTION OR FRE $1.50 (broken type) $1.50
8 [Letter from Dunkirk, N. Y.] Free Trade, or Protection? Protection or Free Trade?
8 Is This Our Country or the English Nobiliyt’s Country? Kansa● / no● / he●d Kansas / not / held
8 GOOD NEWS TO LADIES. Dinner S t Dinner Set
8 LEGAL. TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN 188● (transcribed 188[7?]) 1887
8 UNITED LABOR PARTY. NEW YORK TO THE COUNTRY. blotted line-ends (fig●●, gre●●, b●●, heretofo●●, o●●, ex●●tence, neces●●ties, lesse●, make●, l●bor) fight, great, but, heretofore, our, existence, necessities, lessen, makes, labor
8 CO-OPERATIVE COLONY. Colocy Colony

Those on whom minor excommunication has been imposed are excluded from receiving the Eucharist and can also be excluded from participating in the Divine Liturgy. They can even be excluded from entering a church when divine worship is being celebrated there. The decree of excommunication must indicate the precise effect of the excommunication and, if required, its duration.

Those under major excommunication are in addition forbidden to receive not only the Eucharist but also the other sacraments, to administer sacraments or sacramentals, to exercise any ecclesiastical offices, ministries, or functions whatsoever, and any such exercise by them is null and void. They are to be removed from participation in the Divine Liturgy and any public celebrations of divine worship. They are forbidden to make use of any privileges granted to them and cannot be given any dignity, office, ministry, or function in the Church, they cannot receive any pension or emoluments associated with these dignities etc., and they are deprived of the right to vote or to be elected. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excommunication.